Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 134, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 548-555

  Kitahara Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes ^a   Mucha, José Nelson ^b   dos Santos, Paulo Acioly Marques ^b  

^a Fluminense Federal University ^*

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INJURY; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;

ADHESIVES; CERAMICS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;

EID: 53049093482     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Swartz M.L. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 22 (1988) 82-88
2. Britton J.C., McInnes P., Weinberg R., Ledoux W.R., and Retief D.H. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 348-353
3. Bishara S.E., Olsen M.E., and Wald L.V. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 (1997) 552-559
4. Bishara S.E., Fehr D.E., and Jakobsen J.R. A comparative study of debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 170-179
5. Franklin S., and Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strengths and effects on enamel of two ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 27 (1993) 83-88
6. Bishara S.E., and Trulove T.S. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 145-153
7. Odegaard J., and Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94 (1988) 201-206
8. Bishara S.E., Olsen M.E., VonWald L., and Jakobsen J.R. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 86-92
9. 3M Unitek Internet site. http://www.3m.com/us/healthcare/unitek/appliance_system/clarity_metal.jhtml Accessed November 20, 2004
10. TP Orthodontics Internet site. http://www.invu-ortho.com Accessed November 20, 2004
11. Dentaurum Internet site. http://www.dentaurum.com/eng/orthodontie_6694.aspx?pageid=2744 Accessed November 20, 2004
12. Research Services Branch Internet site. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image Accessed November 20, 2004
13. Kinch A.P., Taylor H., Waritier R., Oliver R.G., and Newcombe R.G. A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding, comparing etch times of 15 and 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95 (1989) 415-421
14. Joseph V.P., and Rossouw P.E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97 (1990) 121-125
15. Maskeroni A.J., Meyrs C.E., and Lorton L. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97 (1990) 168-175
16. Viazis A.D., Cavanaugh G., and Bevis R.R. Bond strength of ceramic bracket under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 214-221
17. Harris A.M., Joseph V.P., and Rossouw P.E. Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102 (1992) 215-219
18. Blalock K.A., and Powers J.M. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 596-603
19. Olsen M.E., Bishara S.E., Boyer D.B., and Jakobsen J.R. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109 (1996) 403-409
20. Gwinnett A.J. A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 (1988) 346-348
21. Eliades T., Viazis A.D., and Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99 (1991) 369-375
22. Eliades T., Viazis A., and Lekka M. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 21-26
23. Eliades T., Lekka M., Eliades G., and Brantley W.A. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 10-18
24. Bordeau F.M., Moore R.N., and Bagby M.D. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 552-560
25. Wang W.N., Meng C.L., and Torng T.H. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111 (1997) 374-381
26. Guan G., Takano-Yamamoto T., Miyamoto M., Hattori T., Ishikawa K., and SuzukiI K. Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117 (2000) 438-443
27. Theodorakopoulou L.P., Sadowsky P.L., Jacobson A., and Lacefield W.J. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 329-336
28. Diaz C., and Swartz M. Debonding a new ceramic bracket: a clinical study. J Clin Orthod 38 (2004) 442-445
29. Bishara S.E., and Fehr D.E. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 253-257
30. Bishara S.E., Fonseca J.M., and Boyer D.B. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 242-248
31. Krell K.V., Courney J.M., and Bishara S.E. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 258-266
32. Boyer D.B., Engelhardt G., and Bishara S.E. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 262-266
33. Zarrinia K., Eid N.M., and Kehoe M.J. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 284-293
34. Rickabaugh S.L., Marangoni R.D., and McCaffrey K.K. Ceramic bracket debonding with the carbon dioxide laser. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110 (1996) 388-393
35. Bishara S.E., and Trulove T.S. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 263-273
36. Hosein I., Sherrif M., and Ireland A.J. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 717-724
37. Merrill S.W., Oesterle L.J., and Hermesch C.B. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106 (1994) 209-217
38. Redd T.B., and Shivapuja P.K. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 25 (1991) 475-481
39. Zachrisson B.U. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber T.M., and Vanarsdall Jr. R.L. (Eds). Orthodontics, current principles and techniques (1994), Mosby, St Louis 542-626
40. Santos C.E.D. Effects of debonding of ceramic brackets in enamel in vitro [monograph] (2003), Dentistry School, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói
41. Jeroudi M.T. Enamel fracture caused by ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99 (1991) 97-99