|
Volumn 111, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 374-381
|
Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE;
METAL;
RESIN CEMENT;
SILANE DERIVATIVE;
ADOLESCENT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CERAMICS;
CHILD;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL DEBONDING;
ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS;
ENAMEL;
EQUIPMENT;
HUMAN;
INJURY;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
ADOLESCENT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE;
CERAMICS;
CHILD;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL DEBONDING;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
HUMANS;
METALS;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN;
ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;
RESIN CEMENTS;
SILANES;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
|
EID: 0031113678
PISSN: 08895406
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80019-4 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (36)
|
References (0)
|