INbreast: Toward a Full-field Digital Mammographic Database.

Academic Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 236-248

  Moreira, Inês C ^a,b,c,d   Amaral, Igor ^c   Domingues, Inês ^c,e   Cardoso, António ^b   Cardoso, Maria João ^a,c,f   Cardoso, Jaime S ^c,e  

^a University of Porto   (Portugal)

^b HOSPITAL DE SÃO JOÃO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^d POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^f Champalimaud Cancer Center   (Portugal)

Author keywords

CAD; Computer aided detection; Computer aided diagnosis; Mammographic database

Indexed keywords

SELENIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST MALFORMATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CENTER; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PORTUGAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84855259290     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. World cancer report 2008, International Agency for Research and Cancer, Lyon, France.
2. Health statistics: atlas on mortality in the European Union 2009, Eurostat, Luxembourg.
3. Fact sheet No. 297: Cancer 2009, World Health Organization, France.
4. Misra S., Solomon N.L., Moffat F.L., et al. Screening criteria for breast cancer. Adv Surg 2010, 44:87-100.
5. Lee C.H., Dershaw D.D., Kopans D., et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7:18-27.
6. European Cancer Observatory. Breast cancer screening programmes in the EU Member States in 2006. Available at: http://eu-cancer.iarc.fr/cancer-13-display-text-562-564.html,en.
7. Karellas A, Vedantham S, Suryanarayan S. Digital mammography: an emerging technology. Business Briefing: Future Directions in Imaging 2006; 2:5. Available at: http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/1677/Future_imaging_06_Con.pdf.
8. Sampat M.P., Bovik A.C., Whitman G.J., et al. A model-based framework for the detection of speculated masses on mammography. Med Phys 2008, 35:2110-2123.
9. Orsi C.J. The American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: an initial attempt to standardize terminology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996, 166:779-780.
10. Orel S.G., Kay N., Reynolds C., et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999, 211:845-850.
11. Mammography Accreditation Program: Submitting Clinical Images. Preston White Drive, Reston: American College of Radiology, 2009; 20191-4397.
12. Bird R.E., Wallace T.W., Yankaskas B.E. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992, 184:612-617.
13. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., Newhouse J.H. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000, 133:855-863.
14. Zheng B., Hardesty L.A., Polle W.R., et al. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment - initial experience. Radiology 2003, 228:58-62.
15. Castellino R.A. Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview. Cancer Imaging 2005, 5:17-19.
16. Nishikawa R.M. Mammographic databases. Breast Dis 1998, 10:137-150.
17. Orellana CJ. Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set. Proceedings of the International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2008; 4776-4779.
18. Nishikawa R.M. Development of a common database for digital mammography research 1996, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
19. Antoniou AC. A web-accessible mammographic image database dedicated to combined training and evaluation of radiologists and machines. 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine, Cyprus, 2009.
20. Oliver A., Freixenet J., Martí J., et al. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Medical Image Anal 2010, 14:87-110.
21. Bernarding J., Thiel A., Decker I., et al. Implementation of a dynamic platform-independent DICOM-server. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2001, 65:71-78.
22. Singh S., Bovis K. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 2005, 9:109-119.
23. Song E., Xu S., Xu X., et al. Hybrid Segmentation of Mass in Mammograms Using Template Matching and Dynamic Programming. Academic Radiology 2010, vol. 17:1414-1424.
24. Rangayyan R.M., Mudigonda N., Desautels J. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med Biol Eng Comp 2000, 38:487-496.
25. Suckling J. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database. In Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series 1069, York, England. 1994; 1069:375-378.
26. Oliver A., Lladó X., Pérez E., et al. A statistical approach for breast density segmentation. JDigital Imaging 2010, 23:527-537.
27. Domínguez AR, Nandi AK. Detection of masses in mammograms using enhanced multilevel-thresholding segmentation and region selection based on rank. In: IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. Austria: Innsbruck, 2007; 1:370-375.
28. Reljin B., Milosevic Z., Stojic T., et al. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2009, 47:525-532.
29. Llobet R, Paredes R, Perez Cortes JC. Comparison of feature extraction methods for breast cancer detection. In Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA). 2005; II:495.
30. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, etal. Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. In Digital Mammography 1998; 457-460.
31. Netsch T., Peitgen H.O. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (MedImg) 1999, 18:774-786.
32. Joseph JYL, Gavrielides M, Markey M, etal. Computer-aided classification of breast microcalcification clusters: merging of features from image processing and radiologists. Medical Imaging Conference, San Diego, CA. Proc SPIE 2003; 5032:882-889. Available at: http://adsabs.harvard.edu//abs/2003SPIE.5032..882L.
33. Wang D.F., Shi L., Heng P.A. Automatic detection of breast cancers in mammograms using structured support vector machines. Neurocomputing 2009, 72:3296-3302.
34. Sakellaropoulos P., Costaridou L.I., Panayiotakis G. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:787-803.
35. Cheng H.D., Cui M. Mass lesion detection with a FUZZY neural network. Patt Recognit 2004, 37:1189-1200.
36. Matheus B.R., Schiabel H. Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes. J Digital Imaging 2010, 24:500-506.
37. Lo CS, Chung PC, Chang CI, etal. A computerized system for detection and segmentation of clustered microcalcifications. Joint Conference of International Computer Symposium 1996; 247-253.
38. Oliver A. Automatic mass segmentation in mammographic images. PhD thesis, Universitat de Girona (España) 2008.
39. Oliveira J.E.E., Gueld M.O., de Araújo A., et al. Towards a standard reference database for computer-aided mammography 2008, Med imaging Computer-aided diagnosis, San Diego, CA, 6915. Available at: http://spie.org/x648.html?product_id=770325.
40. Gardner WD. Breast cancer database provides faster access to patient records. InformationWeek, 2005. Available online at: Accessed Jan. 18, 2011. http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=NBXENMVY3EP5AQSNDBGCKHSCJUMEKJVN?articleID=174400322.
41. Tangaro S., Bellotti R., De Carlo F., et al. MAGIC-5: an Italian mammographic database of digitised images for research. Radiol Med 2008, 113:477-485.
42. Warren R., Solomonides T., del Frate C., et al. MammoGrid: a prototype distributed mammographic database for Europe. Clin Radiol 2007, 62:1044-1051.
43. D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. Available at: http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/biradsatlas/biradsfaqs.aspx.
44. Danikas D., STheodorou S.J.V., Kokkalis G., et al. Mammographic findings following reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001, 25:283-285.
45. Sun L, Li L, Xu W, etal. A novel classification scheme for breast masses based on multi-view information fusion. In Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), 2010 4th International Conference, 2010; 1-4.
46. Liu G., Haralick R.M. Optimal matching problem in detection and recognition performance evaluation. Patt Recog 2002, 35:2125-2139.
47. Zheng B., Wang X., Lederman D., et al. Computer-aided detection: the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses. Acad Radiol 2010, 17:1401-1408.