Mammographic databases

Breast Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 137-150

  Nishikawa, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TEACHING;

EID: 0031682118     PISSN: 08886008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/BD-1998-103-414     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Haus AG. Recent advances in screen-film mammography. Radiol Clin N Am 1987; 25:913-928.
2. Higashida Y, Moribe N, Morita K, et al. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography. Radiology 1992; 183:483-486.
3. Karssemeijer N, Frieling JT, Hendriks JH. Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 1993; 28:413-319.
4. Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 1994; 21:1203-1211.
5. Cowen AR, Launders JH, Jadav M, Brettle DS. Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography. Phys Med Biol 1997; 42:1533-1548.
6. Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems. Med Phys 1985; 12:32-39.
7. Bunch PC, Huff KE, Van Metter R. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic film-screen combination. J Opt Soc Am A 1987; 4:902-909.
8. Cao F, Sickles EA, Huang HK. Interactive Digital Breast Imaging Teaching File. RSNA EJ 1997; 2: http://ej.rsna.org/EJ_0_96/0037-97.fin/ mammo.html.
9. Acharya RS, Goldgof DB, Editors. Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:442-553, 690-871.
10. Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY. Digital Mammography. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science; 1994.
11. Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA. Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science; 1996.
12. Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:9-18.
13. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 1994; 21:265-269.
14. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications using digital mammograms. Med Biol Engin Comp 1995; 33:174-178.
15. Astley S. Creating a database of digital mammograms. SPIE 1993; 1905:535-537.
16. Dance DR. Design of a common database for research in mammogram image analysis. SPIE 1993; 1905:538-539.
17. Karssemeijer N. A common database for research in mammographic image analysis. SPIE 1993; 1905:542-543-
18. Kegelmeyer P. The importance of shared language for performance metrics. SPIE 1993; 1905:544-545.
19. Kimme-Smith C. Clinical considerations for a mammography database. SPIE 1993; 1905:546-547.
20. Nishikawa RM. Design of a common database for research in mammogram image analysis. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:548-549.
21. Rangayyan R, Paranjape R, Shen L, Desautels JEL. A database for mammographic image research. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:550-551.
22. Kroon HM, Steyerberg EW, Schultze-Kool LJ, Hilkens CMU, Seeley GW. Considerations in compiling a database of clinical test images. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:255-263.
23. Prank MS. Computerized mammography data base systems. AJR 1993; 161:287-290.
24. Lo JY, Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CEJ. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:841-850.
25. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, Virginia, American College of Radiology; 1995.
26. Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM, Osnis R, Schreibman KL, Giger ML, Doi K. Computerized detection of lesions missed by mammography. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science; 1996:105-110.
27. Doi K, Imhof H. Noise reduction by radiographic magnification. Radiology 1977; 122:479-487.
28. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Method of extracting microcalcifications' signal area and signal thickness from digital mammograms. Proc SPIE 1992; 1778:28-36.
29. Karssemeijer N. Adaptive noise equalization and recognition of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Int J Pattern Recogn Im Analysis 1993; 7:1357-1376.
30. Trueblood JH, Burch SE, Kearfott K, Brooks KW. Radiographic film digitization. In: Hendee W, eds. AAPM Summer School 1993. New York, American Institute of Physics; 1993.
31. Bowyer K, Kopans D, Kegelmeyer WP, et al. The digital database for screening mammography. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science; 1996:431-434.
32. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Wagner RF, Petrick N, Mossoba J. Effects of sample size on classifier design: Quadratic and neural network classifiers. Proc SPIE 1997; 3034:1102-1113.
33. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, et al. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY, eds. Digital Mammography. Amsterdam, Elsevier; 1994:375-378.
34. Davies DH. Technical note: digital mammography-the comparative evaluation of film digitizers. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:930-933.
35. Mascio LN, Frankel SD, Hernandez JM, Logan CM. Building the LLNL/UCSF digital mammogram library with image ground truth. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam, Elsevier; 1996:427-430.
36. Nishikawa RM, Johnson RE, Wolverton DE, et al. A common database of mammograms for research in digital mammography. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital Mammography '96. Amsterdam, Elsevier; 1996:435-438.