Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 500-506

  Matheus, Bruno Roberto Nepomuceno ^a   Schiabel, Homero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

CAD evaluation; Computer aided diagnosis; Image processing; Images database; Mammography

Indexed keywords

HIGH QUALITY; IMAGES DATABASE; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES; SEARCH SYSTEM; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; SEARCH ENGINES; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERNET; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80052873248     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9297-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. IARC. World cancer report 2008. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon.
2. Qian W, et al: Computer assisted diagnosis for digital mammography. IEEE Eng Med Biol 14(5):561-569, 1995.
3. Kallergi M: Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters. Med Phys 31(2):314-326, 2004.
4. Brzakovic D, Luo XM, Brzakovic P: An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 9(3):233-241, 1990.
5. Hadjiiski L, Chan H-P, Sahiner B, et al: Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 233:255-265, 2004.
6. Brown DG: The Evaluation of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems: An FDA Perspective. Proceedings of the 30th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR™01). [S.l.]: [s. n.]. 2001.
7. Rangayyan RM, et al: A ROC evaluation of adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of digitized mammography. Digital Mammography 307-313. 1994.
8. Edwards DC, et al: Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. Med Phys 29:2861-2870, 2002.
9. Nishikawa RM, Yarusso LM: Variations in measured performance of CAD schemes due to database composition and scoring protocol. SPIE 99: Med Imaging 3338:840-844, 1999.
10. Heath M, et al: The digital database for screening mammography. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2001, pp 212-218.
11. Suckling J, et al: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Medica International Congress 1069:375-378, 1994.
12. Amendolia SR, et al: The CALMA project. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A, Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 461(1-3):428-429, 2001.
13. Lawrence Livermore National Library/UCSF Digital Mammogram Database. Center for Health Care Technologies Livermore. Livermore, CA, USA.
14. Nishikawa RM, et al: Effect of case selection of the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Medical Physics 21:265-270, 1994.
15. Nishikawa RM: Mammographic databases. Breast Dis 10(3, 4):137-150, 1998.
16. Nishikawa RM, et al: Performance of automated CAD schemes for the detection and classification of clustered microcalcifications. Digital mammography, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1994, pp 13-20.
17. Schiabel H, et al: Performance of a processing scheme for clustered microcalcifications detection with different images database. Digest of Papers of the 2000 World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. Chicago: [s.n.]. 2000.
18. Adobe developers association. TIFF: REvision 6.0 - Techinical specification. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 1992.