Functional magnetic resonance imaging of binocular interactions in visual cortex in strabismus

Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 366-374

  Chen, Vincent J ^a   Tarczy Hornoch, Kristina ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; STRABISMUS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; STRABISMUS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855175038     PISSN: 01913913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20101118-01     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Robaei D, Rose KA, Kifley A, Cosstick M, Ip JM, Mitchell P. Factors associated with childhood strabismus: findings from a population-based study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1146-1153.
2. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1229-1236.
3. Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months The Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2128-2134.
4. Sengpiel F, Blakemore C. The neural basis of suppression and amblyopia in strabismus. Eye. 1996;10:250-258.
5. Sengpiel F, Blakemore C, Kind PC, Harrad R. Interocular suppression in the visual cortex of strabismic cats. J Neurosci. 1994;14:6855-6871.
6. Smith EL 3rd, Chino YM, Ni J, Cheng H, Crawford ML, Harwerth RS. Residual binocular interactions in the striate cortex of monkeys reared with abnormal binocular vision. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:1353-1362.
7. Sengpiel F, Jirmann KU, Vorobyov V, Eysel UT. Strabismic suppression is mediated by inhibitory interactions in the primary visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:1750-1758.
8. Joosse MV, Esme DL, Schimsheimer RJ, Verspeek SA, Vermeulen MH, van Minderhout EM. Visual evoked potentials during suppression in exotropic and esotropic strabismics: strabismic suppression objectified. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:142-150.
9. Norcia AM, Hale J, Pettet MW, McKee SP, Harrad RA. Disparity tuning of binocular facilitation and suppression after normal versus abnormal visual development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1168-1175.
10. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9868-9872.
11. Barnes GR, Hess RF, Dumoulin SO, Achtman RL, Pike GB. The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia. J Physiol. 2001;533:281-297.
12. Choi MY, Lee KM, Hwang JM, et al. Comparison between anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1052-1056.
13. Goodyear BG, Nicolle DA, Menon RS. High resolution fMRI of ocular dominance columns within the visual cortex of human amblyopes. Strabismus. 2002;10:129-136.
14. Muckli L, Kiess S, Tonhausen N, Singer W, Goebel R, Sireteanu R. Cerebral correlates of impaired grating perception in individual, psychophysically assessed human amblyopes. Vision Res. 2006;46:506-526.
15. Li X, Dumoulin SO, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1575-1591.
16. Conner IP, Odom J, Schwartz Tl, Mendola JD. Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J AAPOS. 2007;11:341-350.
17. Tong F, Engel SA. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature. 2001;411:195-199.
18. Lee SH, Blake R. V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. J Vis. 2002;2:618-626.
19. Conner IP, Odom JV, Schwartz TL, Mendola JD. Retinotopic maps and foveal suppression in the visual cortex of amblyopic adults. J Physiol. 2007;583:159-173.
20. Straw AD. Vision egg: an open-source library for realtime visual stimulus generation. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2008;2:4. doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.004.2008.
21. Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, et al. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3215-3230.
22. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4207-4221.
23. Tootell RB, Hadjikhani NK, Vanduffel W, et al. Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:811-817.
24. Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Poline J-B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain; June 2-6, 2002; Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, Vol. 16, No 2.
25. Holopigian K. Clinical suppression and binocular rivalry suppression: the effects of stimulus strength on the depth of suppression. Vision Res. 1989;29:1325-1333.
26. Holopigian K, Blake R, Greenwald MJ. Clinical suppression and amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:444-451.
27. Harrad R. Psychophysics of suppression. Eye. 1996;10:270-273.
28. Smith EL 3rd, Levi DM, Manny RE, Harwerth RS, White JM. The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:80-87.
29. Saenz M, Buracas GT, Boynton GM. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:631-632.
30. Engel SA, Glover GH, Wandell BA. Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7:181-192.