Disparity tuning of binocular facilitation and suppression after normal versus abnormal visual development

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1168-1175

  Norcia, Anthony M ^a   Hale, Julia ^b   Pettet, Mark W ^a   McKee, Suzanne P ^a   Harrad, Richard A ^b  

^a SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOMETROPIA; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT STRABISMUS; DIPLOPIA; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE DOMINANCE; GRATING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STRABISMUS;

ADULT; ANISOMETROPIA; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; STRABISMUS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 62649127567     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2281     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Tyler CW. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one. Science. 1971;174:958-961.
2. Tyler CW, Foley JM. Stereomovement suppression for transient disparity changes. Perception. 1974;3:287-296.
3. McKee SP, Levi DM, Bowne SF. The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Res. 1990;30:1763-1779.
4. Harris JM, McKee SP, Watamaniuk SNJ. Visual search for motionin-depth: stereomotion does not "pop out" from disparity noise. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:165-168.
5. McKee SP, Harrad RA. Fusional suppression in normal and stereoanomalous observers. Vision Res. 1993;33:1645-1658.
6. Norcia AM, McKee SP, Bonneh Y, Pettet MW. Suppression of monocular visual direction under fused binocular stimulation: evoked potential measurements. J Vision. 2005;5:34-44.
7. Norcia AM, Wesemann W, Manny RE. Electrophysiological correlates of Vernier and relative motion mechanisms in human visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 1999;16:1123-1131.
8. Levi DM, Manny RE, Klein SA, Steinman SB. Electrophysiological correlates of hyperacuity in the human visual cortex. Nature. 1983;306:468-470.
9. Levi DM, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd. Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation. Science. 1979;206:852-854.
10. Harrad RA, Hess RF. Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia. Vision Res. 1992;32:2135-2150.
11. Schor CM. Visual stimuli for strabismic suppression. Perception. 1977;6:583-593.
12. Norcia AM, Harrad RA, Brown RJ. Changes in cortical activity during suppression in stereoblindness. Neuroreport. 2000;11: 1007-1012.
13. Jampolsky A. Characteristics of suppression in strabismus. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;54:683-696.
14. Hale J, Harrad RA, McKee SP, Pettet MW, Norcia AM. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1786-1790.
15. Victor JD, Mast J. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;78:378-388.
16. Hou C, Good WV, Norcia AM. Validation study of VEP Vernier acuity in normal-vision and amblyopic adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4070-4078.
17. Hood AS, Morrison JD. The dependence of binocular contrast sensitivities on binocular single vision in normal and amblyopic human subjects. J Physiol. 2002;540:607-622.
18. Baker DH, Meese TS, Hess RF. Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation. Vision Res. 2008;48:1625-1640.
19. Baker DH, Meese TS, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5332-5338.
20. Lema SA, Blake R. Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans. Vision Res. 1977;17:691-695.
21. Srebro R. The visually evoked response: binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:839-844.
22. Apkarian PA, Nakayama K, Tyler CW. Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981;51:32-48.
23. Perry NW Jr, Childers DG, McCoy JG. Binocular addition of the visual evoked response at different cortical locations. Vision Res. 1968;8:567-573.
24. Ciganek L. Binocular addition of the visually evoked response with different stimulus intensities in man. Vision Res. 1970;10:479-487.
25. Lennerstrand G. Binocular interaction studied with visual evoked responses (VER) in humans with normal or impaired binocular vision. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1978;56:628-637.
26. Campos EC, Chiesi C. Binocularity in comitant strabismus, II: objective evaluation with visual evoked responses. Doc Ophthalmol. 1983;55:277-293.
27. Harter MR, Seiple WH, Salmon L. Binocular summation of visually evoked responses to pattern stimuli in humans. Vision Res. 1973; 13:1433-1446.
28. Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B. Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S Am. 1980;77:2348-2351.
29. Bodis-Wollner I, Barris MC, Mylin LH, Julesz B, Kropfl W. Binocular stimulation reveals cortical components of the human visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981; 52:298-305.
30. Braddick O, Atkinson J, Julesz B, Kropfl W, Bodis-Wollner I, Raab E. Cortical binocularity in infants. Nature. 1980;288:363-365.
31. Petrig B, Julesz B, Kropfl W, Baumgartner G, Anliker M. Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. Science. 1981;213:1402-1405.
32. Norcia AM, Tyler CW. Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes. Vision Res. 1984;24:395-401.
33. Lehmann D, Skrandies W, Lindenmaier C. Binocularly evoked potentials: slow, late components to random-dot stereograms and correlograms (dynamic Julesz patterns). Prog Brain Res. 1980;54: 286-290.
34. Eizenman M, Westall CA, Geer I, et al. Electrophysiological evidence of cortical fusion in children with early-onset esotropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:354-362.
35. Westall CA, Eizenman M, Kraft SP, Panton CM, Chatterjee S, Sigesmund D. Cortical binocularity and monocular optokinetic asymmetry in early-onset esotropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39:1352-1360.
36. Skarf B, Eizenman M, Katz LM, Bachynski B, Klein R. A new VEP system for studying binocular single vision in human infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993;30:237-242.
37. Lehmann D, Julesz B. Lateralized cortical potentials evoked in humans by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Res. 1978; 18:1265-1271.
38. Baitch LW, Levi DM. Evidence for nonlinear binocular interactions in human visual cortex. Vision Res. 1988;28:1139-1143.
39. Baitch LW, Levi DM. Binocular beats: psychophysical studies of binocular interaction in normal and stereoblind humans. Vision Res. 1989;29:27-35.
40. Suter S, Suter PS, Perrier DT, Parker KL, Fox JA, Roessler JS. Differentiation of VEP intermodulation and second harmonic components by dichoptic, monocular, and binocular stimulation. Vis Neurosci. 1996;13:1157-1166.
41. Brown RJ, Candy TR, Norcia AM. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:3324-3333.
42. Harter MR, Seiple WH, Musso M. Binocular summation and suppression: visually evoked cortical responses to dichoptically presented patterns of different spatial frequencies. Vision Res. 1974;14:1169-1180.
43. Harter MR, Seiple WH, Salmon LE. Evoked cortical responses to dichoptically presented patterned light flashes: interocular interaction. TIT J Life Sci. 1972;2:27-33.
44. Wright KW, Fox BE, Eriksen KJ. PVEP evidence of true suppression in adult onset strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1990;27:196-201.
45. Lehmann D, Fender DH. Monocularly evoked electroencephalogram potentials: influence of target structure presented to the other eye. Nature. 1967;215:204-205.
46. Lehmann D, Fender DH. Component analysis of human averaged evoked potentials: dichoptic stimuli using different target structure. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1968;24: 542-553.
47. Norcia AM, Pei F, Bonneh Y, Hou C, Sampath V, Pettet MW. Development of sensitivity to texture and contour information in the human infant. J Cognitive Neurosci. 2005;17:569-579.