Use of earth's magnetic field for mitigating gyroscope errors regardless of magnetic perturbation

Sensors

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 11390-11414

  Afzal, Muhammad Haris ^a   Renaudin, Valérie ^a   Lachapelle, Gérard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Orientation estimation; Pedestrian navigation; Quasi static magnetic field

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; MAGNETISM;

EARTH (PLANET); GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MAGNETICS;

EID: 84255204982     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s111211390     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alonso, J.M.; Ocana, M.; Sotelo, M.A.; Bergasa, L.M.; Magdalena, L. Wifi Localization System Using Fuzzy Rule-Based Classification. In Computer Aided Systems Theory-Eurocast 2009, MorenoDiaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada Arencibia, A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2009; Volume 5717, pp. 383-390.
2. Inoue, Y.; Sashima, A.; Kurumatani, K. Indoor Positioning System Using Beacon Devices for Practical Pedestrian Navigation on Mobile Phone. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, UIC'09, Brisbane, Australia, 7-9 July 2009; pp. 251-265.
3. Luimula, M.; Saaskilahti, K.; Partala, T.; Pieska, S.; Alaspaa, J. Remote navigation of a mobile robot in an rfid-augmented environment. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2010, 14, 125-136.
4. Shen, G.W.; Zetik, R.; Hirsch, O.; Thoma, R.S. Range-based localization for uwb sensor networks in realistic environments. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2010, 2010, 476598:1-476598:9.
5. Ramalingam, R.; Anitha, G.; Shanmugam, J. Microelectromechnical systems inertial measurement unit error modelling and error analysis for low-cost strapdown inertial navigation system. Def. Sci. J. 2009, 59, 650-658.
6. Bekir, E. Introduction to Modern Navigation Systems; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2007; p. 14.
7. Renaudin, V.; Merminod, B.; Kasser, M. Optimal Data Fusion for Pedestrian Navigation Based on UWB and MEMS. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location And Navigation Symposium, Monterey, CA, USA, 5-8 May 2008; Volumes 1-3, pp. 753-761.
8. Suh, Y.S.; Park, S. Pedestrian Inertial Navigation with Gait Phase Detection Assisted Zero Velocity Updating. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, Wellington, New Zealand, 10-12 February 2009; pp. 505-510.
9. Steinhoff, U.; Schiele, B. Dead Reckoning from the Pocket-An Experimental Study. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Mannheim, Germany, 29 March-2 April 2010; pp. 162-170.
10. Kamisakata, D.; Muramatsu, S.; Iwamoto, T.; Yokoyama, H. Design and implementation of pedestrian dead reckoning system on a mobile phone. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2011, E94D, 1137-1146.
11. Farrell, J.; Barth, M. The Global Positioning System and Inertial Navigation; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
12. Afzal, M.H. Use of Earth's Magnetic Field for Pedestrian Navigation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2011.
13. Knoepfel, H. Magnetic Fields: A Comprehensive Theoretical Treatise for Practical Use; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000; p. 21.
14. Milsom, J. Field Geophysics, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2003; p. xii, 232 pages.
15. Haines, G.V.; Newitt, L.R. The Canadian geomagnetic reference field 1995. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 1997, 49, 317-336.
16. Afzal, M.H.; Renaudin, V.; Lachapelle, G. Assessment of Indoor Magnetic Field Anomalies Using Multiple Magnetometers. In Proceedings of ION GNSS10, Portland, OR, USA, 21-24 September 2010; pp. 1-9.
17. Wertz, J.R. Space Attitude Determination and Control; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht The Netherlands, 1990.
18. Wahba, G. Problem 65-1: A least squares estimate of spacecraft attitude. SIAM Rev. 1965, 7, 409.
19. Shuster, M.D.; Oh, S.D. Three-axis attitude determination from vector observations. J. Guid. Control 1981, 4, 70-77.
20. Farrell, J. Aided Navigation: GPS with High Rate Sensors; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 21.
21. Bak, T. Spacecraft Attitude Determination-A Magnetometer Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, 1999.
22. Brown, R.G.; Hwang, P.Y.C. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
23. Britting, K.R. Inertial Navigation Systems Analysis; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1971; p. 249.
24. Cohen, C.E. Attitude Determination Using GPS. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 1992.
25. Grewal, M.S.; Weill, L.R.; Andrews, A.P. Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
26. Renaudin, V.; Afzal, H.; Lachapelle, G. Complete tri-axis magnetometer calibration in the magnetic field domain. J. Sens. 2010, 2010, 967245:1-967245:10.
27. Afzal, M.H.; Renaudin, V.; Lachapelle, G. Magnetic Field Based Heading Estimation for Pedestrian Navigation Environments. In Proceedings of International Conference on Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Guimaraes, Portugal, 21-23 September 2011; pp. 1-10.
28. Natanson, G.A.; Challa, M.S.; Deutschmann, J.; Baker, D.F. Magnetometer-Only Attitude and Rate Determination for a Gyro-Less Spacecraft. In Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Space Mission Operations and Ground Data Systems, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 1994; pp. 791-798.