Protein interaction network underpins concordant prognosis among heterogeneous breast cancer signatures

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 385-396

  Chen, James ^a   Sam, Lee ^a   Huang, Yong ^a   Lee, Younghee ^a   Li, Jianrong ^a   Liu, Yang ^a   Xing, H Rosie ^a,b   Lussier, Yves A ^a,b  

^a University of Chicago   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Context constrained networks; Gene signatures; Protein interaction networks; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTED P-VALUES; ANALYSIS METHOD; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; BIOMOLECULAR SYSTEM; BREAST CANCER; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; DATA SETS; DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENE; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES; GENE NETWORKS; GENE ONTOLOGY; INTERCONNECTIVITY; KAPLAN-MEIER; MACHINE-LEARNING; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; NODE DEGREE; ONCOGENESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; RESAMPLING; ROADMAP; SCALE-FREE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ACTIVE NETWORKS; BIOLOGY; ONTOLOGY; PROTEINS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

GENE EXPRESSION;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BONE METASTASIS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOGENESIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; DISEASE COURSE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INTERACTION; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LUNG METASTASIS; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SAMPLING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

EID: 77952745604     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. van 't Veer L.J., Dai H., et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415 (2002) 530-536
2. van de Vijver M.J., He Y.D., et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1999-2009
3. Paik S., Shak S., et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 2817-2826
4. Chuang H.Y., Lee E., et al. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol 3 (2007) 140
5. Minn A.J., Gupta G.P., et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature 436 (2005) 518-524
6. Wang Y., Klijn J.G., et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365 (2005) 671-679
7. Fan C., Oh D.S., et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 560-569
8. Massague J. Sorting out breast-cancer gene signatures. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 294-297
9. Bertucci F., Finetti P., et al. Gene expression profiling for molecular characterization of inflammatory breast cancer and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res 64 (2004) 8558-8565
10. Saal L.H., Johansson P., et al. Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (2007) 7564-7569
11. Shen R., Ghosh D., et al. Prognostic meta-signature of breast cancer developed by two-stage mixture modeling of microarray data. BMC Genomics 5 (2004) 94
12. van Vliet M.H., Reyal F., et al. Pooling breast cancer datasets has a synergetic effect on classification performance and improves signature stability. BMC Genomics 9 (2008) 375
13. Pujana M.A., Han J.D., et al. Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet 39 (2007) 1338-1349
14. Margolin A.A., and Califano A. Theory and limitations of genetic network inference from microarray data. Ann NY Acad Sci 1115 (2007) 51-72
15. Margolin A.A., Nemenman I., et al. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics 7 Suppl. 1 (2006) S7
16. Lage K., Karlberg E.O., et al. A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat Biotechnol 25 (2007) 309-316
17. Lee Y., Yang X., et al. Network modeling identifies molecular functions targeted by miR-204 to suppress head and neck tumor metastasis. PLoS Comput Biol 6 (2010) e1000730 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000730
18. Sam L., Liu Y., et al. Discovery of protein interaction networks shared by diseases. Pac Symp Biocomput 76 (2007) 87
19. Van Laere S., Van der Auwera I., et al. Distinct molecular signature of inflammatory breast cancer by cDNA microarray analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93 (2005) 237-246
20. Wang K., Alvarez M.J., et al. Dissecting the interface between signaling and transcriptional regulation in human B cells. Pac Symp Biocomput 264 (2009) 275
21. Ideker T., and Sharan R. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res 18 (2008) 644-652
22. Liu R., Wang X., et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 217-226
23. Sotiriou C., Wirapati P., et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98 (2006) 262-272
24. Ivshina A.V., George J., et al. Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 66 (2006) 10292-10301
25. Kang Y., Siegel P.M., et al. A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell 3 (2003) 537-549
26. Ingenuity Systems©.
27. Yu H., Kim P.M., et al. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 3 (2007) e59
28. Tabach Y., Milyavsky M., et al. The promoters of human cell cycle genes integrate signals from two tumor suppressive pathways during cellular transformation. Mol Syst Biol 1 (2005) 22
29. Desmedt C., Piette F., et al. Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13 (2007) 3207-3214
30. Shannon P., Markiel A., et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13 (2003) 2498-2504
31. Kanehisa M., Goto S., et al. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 38 (2010) D355-D360
32. Yamauchi H., Cristofanilli M., et al. Molecular targets for treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6 (2009) 387-394
33. Swain S.M., Wilson J.W., et al. Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 516-523
34. Cunliffe H.E., Ringner M., et al. The gene expression response of breast cancer to growth regulators: patterns and correlation with tumor expression profiles. Cancer Res 63 (2003) 7158-7166
35. Wittner B.S., Sgroi D.C., et al. Analysis of the MammaPrint breast cancer assay in a predominantly postmenopausal cohort. Clin Cancer Res 14 (2008) 2988-2993
36. Srour N., Reymond M.A., et al. Lost in translation? A systematic database of gene expression in breast cancer. Pathobiology 75 (2008) 112-118
37. Albain K.S., Barlow W.E., et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11 (2010) 55-65
38. http://www.thebiogrid.org/downloads.php. BioGRID.
39. http://reactome.org/download/index.html. Reactome.
40. http://dip.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/dip/Download.cgi. Database of interacting proteins.
41. http://mint.bio.uniroma2.it/mint/download.do. Domino: a domain peptide interactions database.
42. http://www.hprd.org/download. Human proteome reference database.
43. http://bond.unleashedinformatics.com. Biological objects network databank.
44. Farkas I.J., Wu C., et al. Topological basis of signal integration in the transcriptional-regulatory network of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 478
45. Barabasi A.L., and Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (1999) 509-512
46. Team RDC R. A language and environmental for statistical computing; 2005.
47. Li C., and Hung Wong W. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application. Genome Biol 2 (2001) [RESEARCH0032]
48. Simon R.L.A., Li M.C., Ngan M., Menenzes S., and Zhao Y.D. Analysis of gene expression data using BRB-array tools. Cancer Inform 3 (2007) 11-17
49. Subramanian A., Tamayo P., et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 15545-15550
50. www.graphpad.com. GraphPad.
51. www.geneontology.org/GO.tools.microarray.shtml#onto-e Onto-Express.
52. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25 (2000) 25-29
53. Cox D. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34 (1972) 187-202