Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre

European Journal of Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 343-360

  Das, Ranjana ^a  

^a University of Luneberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

audiences; interpretation; literacies; SNS; users

Indexed keywords

EID: 84155187142     PISSN: 02673231     EISSN: 14603705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267323111423379     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allen RSpeaking of Soap Operas. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press; 1985:.
2. Allen RChannels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. London: Routledge; 1992:.
3. Ang IWatching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. New York: Methuen; 1985:.
4. Bachmair B,Bazalgette C.The European Charter for media literacy: Meaning and potential.Research in Comparative and International Education. 2007;2 (1): 80-87.
5. Bolter JD,Grusin RRemediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
6. Brügger N.Website history and the website as an object of study.New Media and Society. 2009;11 (1/2): 115-133.
7. Bruner J.The narrative construction of reality.Critical Inquiry. 1991;18 (1): 1-21.
8. Bruns ABlogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang; 2008:.
9. Buckingham D,Is there a digital generation?, In. Digital Generation: Children, Young People and the Media. Buckingham DWillet R, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006:1-13.
10. Buckingham D.Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet.Research in Comparative and International Education. 2007;2 (1): 43-55.
11. Buckingham D.'Creative' visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals.Media, Culture and Society. 2009;31 (4): 633-652.
12. Buckingham D. Talking about their generation: Constructions of the digital learner,In, 'Digital Natives': A Myth?. Das RBeckett C, ed. London: POLIS; 2010:.
13. Burbules N. Rhetorics of the web: Hyperreading and critical literacy,In, Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. Snyder I, ed. London: Routledge; 1998:102-122.
14. Das R.Meaning at the interface: New genres, new modes of interpretative engagement?.Communication Review. 2010;13 (2): 140-159.
15. Das R.Digital youth, heterogeneity and diversity: A report on the LSE-POLIS event on 'Digital Natives'.Journal of Media Practice. 2011;11 (3): 293-299.
16. Eco UThe Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1979:.
17. Fiske JTelevision Culture. London: Methuen; 1988:.
18. Foot K.Web use and meaning, materiality, and sociality through activity theory. Paper presented at 4S Annual Meeting; 2009Washington DC; 2009.
19. Fornäs J,Klein K,Ladendorf M,Sunden J,Sveningsson MDigital Borderlands: Cultural Studies of Identity and Interactivity on the Internet. New York: Peter Lang; 2002:.
20. Freebody P,Luke A.Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context.Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL. 1990;5 (7): 7-16.
21. Gauntlett D,Holzwarth P.Creative and visual methods for exploring identities.Visual Studies. 2006;21 (1): 82-91.
22. Gee JP. Semiotic domains: Is playing video games a 'waste of time'? In:, The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology. Salen KZimmerman E, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006:228-267.
23. Hartley JPopular Reality: Journalism, Modernity, Popular Culture. London: Arnold; 1996:.
24. Hull G,Schultz K.Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research.Review of Educational Research. 2001;71 (4): 575-611.
25. Hutchby I.Technologies, texts and affordances.Sociology. 2001;35 (2): 441-456.
26. Iser WThe Implied Reader. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1974:.
27. Iser WThe Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1978:.
28. Ito M,Baumer S,Bittanti M,Boyd D,Cody R,Herr B, et alHanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010:.
29. Jauss HRToward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1982:.
30. Jenkins HTextual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge; 1992:.
31. Johnson R.What is cultural studies anyway?.Social Text. 1986;16 (Winter): 38-80.
32. Kitzinger J. Understanding AIDS: Researching audience perceptions of acquired immune deficiency syndrome,In, Getting the Message. Eldridge J, ed. London: Routledge; 1993:271-249.
33. Kress GLiteracy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge; 2003:.
34. Kress G. So what is learning, actually? Social change, technological change and a continuing place for the school?,In, Digital Literacies: Tracing the Implications for Learners and Learning. Livingstone S, ed. Bristol: ESRC; 2009:.
35. Leu J,Donald J. Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age,in, Handbook of Reading Research, Vol III;. Kamil MLMosenthal PPearson PDBarr R, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:.
36. Lewis C,Fabos B.Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities.Reading Research Quarterly. 2005;40 (4): 470-501.
37. Liebes T,Katz EThe Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1993:.
38. Lievrouw L,Livingstone S. Introduction to the updated student edition.In, The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences. Lievrouw LLivingstone S, ed. rev. student edn. London: Sage; 2006:1-14.
39. Livingstone S.The resourceful reader: Interpreting television characters and narratives. With peer review commentaries.Communication Yearbook. 1992;15:58-90.
40. Livingstone SMaking Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. 1998) Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation, rev. 2nd edn.London: Routledge.London: Routledge; 1998:.
41. Livingstone S.The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet?.European Journal of Communication. 2004;19 (1): 75-86.
42. Livingstone S.Engaging with media: A matter of literacy?.Communication, Culture and Critique. 2008;1 (1): 51-62.
43. Livingstone SChildren and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. London: Polity; 2009:.
44. Livingstone S,Haddon L. Introduction,In, Kids Online: Opportunities and Risk for Children. Livingstone SHaddon L, ed. London: Policy Press; 2009:.
45. McPherson TUnexpected Outcomes and Innovative Uses of Digital Media by Youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:.
46. Morley D.Active audience theory: Pendulums and pitfalls.Journal of Communication. 1993;43 (4): 13-19.
47. O'Neill B,Barnes CMedia Literacy and the Public Sphere: A Contextual Study for Public Media Literacy Promotion in Ireland. Dublin: Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin Institute of Technology; 2008:.
48. Papacharissi Z.The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld.New Media and Society. 2009;11 (1/2): 199-221.
49. Peters B.And lead us not into thinking the new is new: A bibliographic case for new media history.New Media and Society. 2009;11 (1/2): 13-31.
50. Potter WJ.Argument for the need for a cognitive theory of media literacy.American Behavioral Scientist. 2004;48 (2): 266-272.
51. Press A, Taking audience research into the age of new media: Old problems and new challenges. In, Livingstone SQuestions of Method in Cultural Studies. White MSchwoch J, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006:175-200.
52. Radway JAReading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1984:.
53. Sefton-Green J,Nixon H,Erstad O.Reviewing approaches and perspectives on 'digital literacy'.Pedagogies: An International Journal. 2009;4 (2): 107-125.
54. Snyder I.A new communication order: Researching literacy practices in the network society.Language and Education. 2001;15 (2): 117-131.
55. Snyder I,Beavis CDoing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World. New York: Hampton Press; 2004:.
56. Street B.New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education?.Linguistics and Education. 1998;10 (1): 1-24.
57. Willett R.Learning and social relations in teens' online interactions. Paper presented at the Silverstone Panel on Digital Natives; 2009LSE, London; 2009.