Introduction to the updated student edition

Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-14

  Lievrouw, Leah A ^a   Livingstone, Sonia ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951040416     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211304     Document Type: Editorial

References (70)

1. Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998) Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446222331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222331
2. Agre, P. (2004) ‘Internet research: For and against’, in M. Consalvo et al. (eds), Internet Research Annual, Volume 1. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 25-36.
3. Alexander, J.C., Giesen, B., Munch, R. and Smelser, N.J. (eds) (1987) The Micro-macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4. Ang, I. (1990) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
5. Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Ball-Rokeach, S.J. and Reardon, K. (1988) ‘Monologue, dialogue, and telelog: Comparing an emergent form of communication with traditional forms’, in R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree (eds), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 135-61.
7. Boczkowski, P.J. (2004) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Boczkowski, P. and Lievrouw, L.A. (forthcoming) ‘Bridging S&TS and communication studies: Research on media and information technologies’, in E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman (eds), New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bolter, J.D. and Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Bryant, J. and Street, R.L. Jr. (1988) ‘From reactivity to activity and action: An evolving concept and Weltanschauung in mass and interpersonal communication’, in R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann and S. Pingree (eds), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 162-90.
11. Bucy, E.P. and Newhagen, J.E. (eds) (2004) Media Access: Social and Psychological Dimensions of New Technology Use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Castells, M. (2002) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: OUP. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199255771.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199255771.001.0001
13. Coleman, S. (2004) ‘Blogs as listening posts rather than soapboxes’, in R. Ferguson and M. Howell (eds), Political Blogs: Craze or Convention. London: Hansard Society.
14. Compaine, B.M. (ed.) (2001) The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.
15. Ferment in the Field (1983) Special issue of the Journal of Communication, 33 (3), summer.
16. Fornas, J. (2002) ‘Passages across thresholds: Into the borderlands of mediation’, Convergence, 8 (4): 89-106. doi:10.1177/135485650200800409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135485650200800409
17. Gandy, O.H. (2002) ‘The real digital divide: Citizens versus consumers’, in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) Handbook of New Media. London: Sage, pp. 448-600. doi:10.4135/9781446211304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446211304
18. Gee, J.P. (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Golding, P. (2000) ‘Forthcoming features: Information and communications technologies and the sociology of the future’, Sociology, 34 (1): 165-84.
20. Gray, A. (1999) ‘Audience and reception research in retrospect: The trouble with audiences’, in P. Alasuutari (ed.), Rethinking the Media Audience. London: Sage, pp. 22-37. doi:10.4135/9781446216996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216996
21. Hartley, J. (1988) ‘The real world of audiences’, Critical Response, 5 (3): 234-43.
22. Huberman, B.A. (2000) The Laws of the Web: Patterns in the Ecology of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Kellner, D. (2002) ‘New media and new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millenium’, in L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds), The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London: Sage, pp. 90-104.
24. Kress, G. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203164754 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754
25. Latour, B. (1991) ‘Technology is society made durable’, in J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 103-31.
26. Lazarfeld, P.F. (1941) ‘Remarks on administrative and critical communication research’, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9: 2-16.
27. Levy, M.R. and Gurevitch, M. (eds) (1994) Defining Media Studies: Reflections on the Future of the Field. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Lievrouw, L.A. (2000) ‘The information environment and universal service’, The Information Society, 16 (2): 155-9. doi:10.1080/01972240050032924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240050032924
29. Lievrouw, L.A. (2001) ‘New media and the "pluralization of life-worlds": A role for information in social differentiation’, New Media and Society, 3(1): 7-28.
30. Lievrouw, L.A. (2004) ‘What's changed about new media? Introduction to the fifth anniversary issue’, New Media & Society, 6 (1): 9-15. doi:10.1177/1461444804039898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039898
31. Lievrouw, L.A. and Farb, S.E. (2003) ‘Information and social equity’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37: 499-540. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370112
32. Lievrouw, L.A. and Finn, T.A. (1990) ‘Identifying the common dimensions of communication: the Communication Systems Model’, in Brent D. Ruben and Leah A. Lievrouw (eds), Mediation, Information and Communication: Information and Behavior, volume 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 37-65.
33. Lievrouw, L.A. and Livingstone, S. (2002) ‘Introduction: The social shaping and consequences of new media’, in L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London: Sage, pp. 1-15. doi:10.4135/9781446211304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446211304
34. Light, J. (2001) ‘Rethinking the digital divide’, Harvard Educational Review, 71 (4): 710-34.
35. Ling, R. (2004) The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society. San Francisco: Elsevier.
36. Livingstone, S. (2002) Young People and New Media: Childhood and the Changing Media Environment. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446219522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219522
37. Livingstone, S. (2004) ‘Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies’, Communication Review, 7: 3-14. doi:10.1080/10714420490280152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
38. Livingstone, S. (2004) ‘The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the internet age?', European Journal of Communication, 19 (1): 75-86. doi:10.1177/0267323104040695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040695
39. Livingstone, S. (ed.) (2005) Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Bristol: Intellect Press.
40. Livingstone, S. (in press) ‘Critical debates in internet studies: Reflections on an emerging field’, in J. Curran and M. Gurevich (eds), Mass Media and Society, 4th edn. London: HodderArnold.
41. Loader, B. (ed.) (1998) Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203169537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203169537
42. Luke, C. (1989) Pedagogy, Printing and Protestantism: The Discourse of Childhood. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43. MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds) (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
44. Manguel, A. (1996) A History of Reading. New York: Penguin.
45. Manovich, L. (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Murdock, G. (2002) ‘Review Article: Debating digital divides’, European Journal of Communication, 17 (3): 385-90. doi:10.1177/0267323102017003695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017003695
48. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1995, July) Falling Through the Net: A Survey of ‘Have Nots’ in Rural and Urban America. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce. URL (consulted April 13, 2005): http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html.
49. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1998, July) Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce. URL (consulted April 13, 2005): http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html.
50. Norris, P. (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Poster, M. (1990) The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Rafaeli, S. (1988) ‘Interactivity: From new media to communication’, in R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann and S. Pingree (eds), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 110-34.
53. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. Stanford, CA: CSLI, and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Rice, R.E. and Associates (eds) (1984) The New Media: Communication, Research and Technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Rogers, E.M. (1986) Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York: Free Press.
56. Rogers, E.M. and Kincaid, D.L. (1981) Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: Free Press.
57. Sawhney, H. and Barnett, G.A. (eds) (1999) Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. XV: Advances in Telecommunications. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
58. Schement, J.R. and Lievrouw, L.A. (1987) ‘The fundamental assumptions of information society research’, in J.R. Schement and L.A. Lievrouw (eds), Competing Visions, Complex Realities: Social Aspects of the Information Society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 1-10.
59. Schiller, H.I. (1981) Who Knows: Information in the Age of the Fortune 500. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60. Selwyn, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide’, New Media and Society, 6 (3): 341-62. doi:10.1177/1461444804042519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
61. Silverstone, R. (2005) ‘Mediation and communication’, in Craig Calhoun, Chris Rojek and Bryan S. Turner (eds), International Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage.
62. Smythe, D. (1981) ‘On the audience commodity and its work’, in Dependency Road: Communications, Capitalism, Consciousness, and Canada. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 22-51.
63. Stone, A.R. (1995) The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Turow, J. (1990) ‘The critical importance of mass communication as a concept’, in B. Rubin and L.A. Lievrouw (eds), Mediation, Information, and Communication: Information and Behavior, volume 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 9-19.
65. Verhulst, S. (2005) Analysis into the Social Implication of Mediation by Emerging Technologies. Draft position paper for the MIT-OII Joint Workshop, New Approaches to Research on the Social Implications of Emerging Technologies. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, April 15-16, 2005. http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk
66. Warschauer, M. (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Wellman, B. (2004) ‘The three ages of Internet studies: Ten, five and zero years ago’, New Media and Society, 6(1): 123-9. doi:10.1177/1461444804040633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804040633
68. Wellman, B., and Haythornwaite, C. (2002) The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470774298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298
69. Williams, R. (1974) Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana. doi:10.4324/9780203426647 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203426647
70. Woolgar, S. (2002) ‘Five rules of virtuality’, in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: OUP, pp. 1-22.