Imaging for Transcatheter Valve Procedures

Current Problems in Cardiology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 228-276

  Kapadia, Samir R ^a   Schoenhagen, Paul ^a   Stewart, William ^a   Tuzcu, E Murat ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CORONARY SINUS; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGING; INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77951959337     PISSN: 01462806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Silvestry F.E., Kerber R.E., Brook M.M., et al. Echocardiography-guided interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22:213-231. quiz: 316-7.
2. Ratnayaka K., Faranesh A.Z., Guttman M.A., et al. Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: still tantalizing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008, 10:62.
3. Gutierrez L.F., Silva R., Ozturk C., et al. Technology preview: X-ray fused with magnetic resonance during invasive cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007, 70:773-782.
4. Ratnayaka K., Raman V.K., Faranesh A.Z., et al. Antegrade percutaneous closure of membranous ventricular septal defect using X-ray fused with magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:224-230.
5. Rhode K.S., Sermesant M., Brogan D., et al. A system for real-time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005, 24:1428-1440.
6. Kuehne T., Yilmaz S., Meinus C., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transcatheter implantation of a prosthetic valve in aortic valve position: feasibility study in swine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:2247-2249.
7. Schoenhagen P., Tuzcu E.M., Kapadia S.R., et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J 2009, 30:2079-2086.
8. Piazza N., de Jaegere P., Schultz C., et al. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 1:74-81.
9. Goldstein S.A., Campbell A., Mintz G.S., et al. Feasibility of on-line transesophageal echocardiography during balloon mitral valvulotomy: experience with 93 patients. J Heart Valve Dis 1994, 3:136-148.
10. Roberts W.C., Ko J.M. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005, 111:920-925.
11. Kort S. Intracardiac echocardiography: evolution, recent advances, and current applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006, 19:1192-1201.
12. Kim S.S., Hijazi Z.M., Lang R.M., et al. The use of intracardiac echocardiography and other intracardiac imaging tools to guide noncoronary cardiac interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:2117-2128.
13. Kamdar A.R., Meadows T.A., Roselli E.E., et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 85:1239-1245.
14. Tops L.F., Delgado V., van der Kley F., et al. Percutaneous aortic valve therapy: clinical experience and the role of multi-modality imaging. Heart 2009, 95:1538-1546.
15. Tops L.F., Wood D.A., Delgado V., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:321-330.
16. Akhtar M., Tuzcu E.M., Kapadia S.R., et al. Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement: evidence of aortic root remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:950-956.
17. Kurra V., Schoenhagen P., Roselli E.E., et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: Preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:1258-1264.
18. Tops L.F., Kapadia S.R., Tuzcu E.M., et al. Percutaneous valve procedures: an update. Curr Probl Cardiol 2008, 33:417-457.
19. Hoe J. Coronary angiography of chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries: how to recognize and evaluate and usefulness for planning percutaneous coronary interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 25(suppl 1):43-54.
20. Petersilka M., Bruder H., Krauss B., et al. Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol 2008, 68:362-368.
21. Herzog C., Abolmaali N., Balzer J.O., et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:2670-2678.
22. Herzog B.A., Husmann L., Burkhard N., et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:3037-3042.
23. Zajarias A., Cribier A.G. Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1829-1836.
24. Quill J.L., Hill A.J., Laske T.G., et al. Mitral leaflet anatomy revisited. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:1077-1081.
25. Detaint D., Lepage L., Himbert D., et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and anulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:821-827.
26. Solomon S.B. The future of interventional cardiology lies in the left atrium. Int J Cardiovasc Interv 2004, 6:101-106.
27. Guerios E.E., Bueno R., Nercolini D., et al. Mitral stenosis and percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (part 2). J Invasive Cardiol 2005, 17:440-444.
28. Guerios E.E., Bueno R., Nercolini D., et al. Mitral stenosis and percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (part 1). J Invasive Cardiol 2005, 17:382-386.
29. Sanchez P.L., Harrell L.C., Salas R.E., et al. Learning curve of the Inoue technique of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 2001, 88:662-667.
30. Roberts J.W., Lima J.A. Role of echocardiography in mitral commissurotomy with the Inoue balloon. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1994, (Suppl 2):69-75.
31. Feldman T., Kar S., Rinaldi M., et al. Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system: safety and midterm durability in the initial Everest (endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:686-694.
32. Silvestry F.E., Rodriguez L.L., Herrmann H.C., et al. Echocardiographic guidance and assessment of percutaneous repair for mitral regurgitation with the Evalve MitraClip: lessons learned from Everest I. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007, 20:1131-1140.
33. Choure A.J., Garcia M.J., Hesse B., et al. In vivo analysis of the anatomical relationship of coronary sinus to mitral anulus and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac multidetector computed tomography: implications for percutaneous coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1938-1945.
34. Tops L.F., Van de Veire N.R., Schuijf J.D., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary sinus anatomy and its relation to the mitral valve anulus: implications for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. Circulation 2007, 115:1426-1432.
35. Pedersen W.R., Block P., Leon M., et al. iCoapsys mitral valve repair system: percutaneous implantation in an animal model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 72:125-131.