Interaction with a moving object affects one's perception of its animacy

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 187-193

  Fukuda, Haruaki ^a   Ueda, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Animacy perception; Human robot interaction; Moving robot

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

1/F NOISE; ANIMACY; GOAL DIRECTED; GOAL-DIRECTEDNESS; MOVING OBJECTS; MOVING ROBOTS; WHETHER DIFFERENCES;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 83755216232     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0045-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, New Yo r k
2. Premack D (1990) The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36:1-16
3. Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness. MIT Press, Cambridge
4. Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243-249
5. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception 68:1047-1058
6. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2006) The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Percept Psychophys 68:1047-1058
7. Dittrich W, Les S (1994) Visual perception of intentional motions. Perception 23:253-268
8. Poulin-Doubois D, Lepage A, Ferland D (1996) Infants concept of animacy. Cogn Dev 11:19-36
9. Legerstee M (2000) Precursors to the development of intention at 6 months: understanding people and their actions. Dev Psychol 36:627-634
10. Arita A, Hiraki K, Kanda K, Ishiguro H (2005) Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. Cognition 95:B49-B57
11. Bartneck C, Kulic D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:71-81
12. Lee KM, Park NH, Song H (2005) Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Hum Commun Res 31:538-563
13. Bartneck C, Kanda T, Mubbin O, Mahmud A (2009) Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int J Soc Robot 1:195-204
14. Okita SY, Schwartz DL (2006) Young children's understanding of animacy and entertainment robots. Int J Hum Robot 3:393-412
15. Kozima H, Michalowski MP, Nakagawa C (2009) Keepon: a playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. Int J Soc Robot 1:3-18
16. Shaw-Garlock G (2009) Looking forward to sociable robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:249-260
17. Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S, Ratcliff R (2005) Human cognition and a pile of sand: a discussion on serial correlations and self-organized criticality. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:108-116
18. Gilden DL (2001) Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise. Psychol Rev 108:33-56
19. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2006) E-puck educational robot. www.e-puck.org
20. Opfer JE (2002) Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change. Cognition 86:97-122
21. Richards DD, Siegler RS (1986) Children's understandings of the attributes of life. J Exp Child Psychol 42:1-22
22. Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge
23. Wheatley T, Milleville SG, Martin A (2007) Understanding animate agent: distinct roles for the social network and mirror system. Psychol Sci 18:469-474
24. Keysers C, Perrett DI (2004) Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 8:501-507
25. Schultz J, Friston KJ, O'Doherty J, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2005) Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron 45:625-635
26. Schultz J, Imamizu H, Kawato M, Frith CD (2004) Activation of the human superior temporal gyrus during observation of goal attribution by intentional objects. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1695-1705
27. Blakemore SJ, Boyer P, Pachot-Clouard M, Meltzoff A, Sege-barth C, Decety J (2003) The detection of contingency and ani-macy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 13: 837-844
28. Adolphs R (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:4165-4178
29. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169-192
30. Carr L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau M-C, Mazziotta JC, Lenzi GL (2003) Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 100:5497-5502
31. Gallese V, Goldman A (1998) Mirror neurons and simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci 2:493-501
32. Johnson S, Booth A, O'Heam K (2001) Inferring the goals of non-human agent. Cogn Dev 16:637-656
33. Miyashita T, Ishiguro H (2004) Human-like natural behavior generation based on involuntary motions for humanoid robots. Robot Auton Syst 48:203-212
34. Moss F, Wiesenfeld K (1995) The benefits of background noise. Sci Am 273:50-53
35. Nozaki D, Mar D, Grigg P, Collins JJ (1999) Effect of colored noise on stochastic resonance in sensory neurons. Phys Rev Lett 82:2402-2405
36. Kiss LB, Gingl Z, Marton Z, Kertesz J, Moss F, Schmera G, Bul-sara A (1993) 1/f noise in systems showing stochastic resonance. J Stat Phys 70:451-462
37. Ishiguro I (2005) Android science: toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. Proc Cogsci2005, workshop, pp 1-6
38. Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani (uncanny valley). Energy 7:33-35