Application of structure equation modeling for inferring a serial transcriptional regulation in yeast

Gene Regulation and Systems Biology

Volumn 2011, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 75-88

  Aburatani, Sachiyo ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Expression profle; Gene regulatory network; Structural equation modeling; Transcriptional regulation

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN GA14P; PROTEIN GA180P; PROTEIN MIG1P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENE TARGETING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

EID: 83755188107     PISSN: 11776250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/GRSB.S7569     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brazhnik P, Fuente A, Mende P. Gene networks: how to put the function in genomics. Trends in Biotechnology. 2002;20(11):467-72.
2. Akutsu T, Miyano S, Kuhara S. Algorithms for identifying Boolean networks and related biological networks based on matrix multiplication and fngerprint function. J Comput Biol. 2000;7:331-43.
3. Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Pe'er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol. 2000;7:601-20.
4. Aburatani S, Kuhara S, Toh H, Horimoto K. Deduction of a gene regulatory relationship framework from gene expression data by the application of graphical Gaussian modeling. Signal Processing. 2003;83:777-88.
5. Aburatani S, Horimoto K. Elucidation of the Relationships between LexA-Regulated Genes in the SOS response. Genome Informatics. 2005;16: 95-105.
6. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1989.
7. Haavelmo T. The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica. 1943;11:1-12.
8. Duncan OD. Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
9. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
10. Liu B, Fuente ADL, Hoeshele I. Gene Network Inference via Structural Equation Modeling in Genomics Experiments. Genetics. 2008;178:1763-76.
11. Aten JE, Fuller TF, Lusis AJ, Horvath S. Using genetic markers to orient the edges in quantitative trait networks: The NEO software. BMC Systems Biology. 2008;2(34):1-21.
12. Shieh GS, Chen CM, Yu CY, Huang J, Wang WF, et al. Inferring transcriptional compensation interactions in yeast via stepwise structure equation modeling. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(134):1-10.
13. Xiong M, Li J, Fang X. Identifcation of Genetic Networks. Genetics. 2004; 166:1037-52.
14. Lee S, Jhun M, Lee EK, Park T. Application of structural equation models to construct genetic networks using differentially expressed genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms. BMC proceedings. 2007;I(S76):1-5.
15. Westergaard SL, Oliveira AP, Bro C, Olsson L, Nielsen J. A systems biology approach to study glucose repression in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2007;96(1):134-45.
16. Prasad V, Venkatesh K.V. Stochastic analysis of the GAL genetic switch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Modeling and experiments reveal hierarchy in glucose repression. BMC Systems Biology. 2008;2(97):1-17.
17. Klein CJ, Olsson L, Nielsen J. Glucose control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of Mig1 in metabolic function. Microbiology. 1998;144:13-24.
18. Griggs DW, Johnston M. Regulated expression of the GAL4 activator gene in yeast provides a sensitive genetic switch for glucose repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:8597-601.
19. Nehlin JO, Ronne H. Yeast MIG1 repressor is related to the mammalian early growth response and Wilms' tumour fnger proteins. EMBO J. 1990;9:2891-8.
20. Nehlin JO, Carlberg M, Ronne H. Control of yeast GAL gene by MIG1 repressor: a transcriptional cascade in the glucose response. EMBO J. 1991;3373-7.
21. Peng G, Hopper JE. Gene activation by interaction of an inhibitor with a cytoplasmic signaling protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8548-53.
22. Venkatesh K V, Bhat PJ, Kumar RA, Doshi P. Quantitative model for Gal4p-mediated expression of the galactose/melibiose regulon. Biotechnol Prog. 1999;15:51-7.
23. Verma M, Bhat PJ, Venkatesh K V. Expression of GAL genes in a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking GAL80: quantitative model and experimental verifcation. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2004;39:89-97.
24. Hashimoto H, Kikuchi Y, Nogi Y, Fukasawa T. Regulation of expression of the galactose gene cluster in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Isolation and characterization of the regulatory gene GAL4. Mol. Gen Genet. 1983;191(1): 31-8.
25. Lohr D, Venkov P, Zlatanova J. Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network. FASEB J. 1995;9(9):777-87.
26. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature. 2004; 431(7004):99-104.
27. Zhu C, Byers KJ, McCord RP, Shi Z, Berger MF, et al. High-resolution DNA-binding specifcity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res. 2009;19(4):556-66.
28. Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R. Causation, Prediction, and Search. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2001.
29. Mulaik SA, Millasap RE. Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling. 2000;7(1):36-73.
30. Hochreiter S, Clevert DA, Obermayer K. A new summarization method for affymetrix probe level data. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(8):943-9.
31. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL-VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Redondo Beach: Doss-Haus Books; 1984.
32. Kendall MG, Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Hafner; 1973.
33. Pilauri V, Bewley M, Diep C, Hopper J. Gal80 dimerization and the yeast GAL gene switch. Genetics. 2005;169(4):1903-19.
34. Melcher K. Mutational hypersensitivity of a gene regulatory protein: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal80p. Genetics. 2005:171(2):469-76.
35. Li Y, Chen G, Liu W. Alterations in the interaction between GAL4 and GAL80 effect regulation of the yeast GAL regulon mediated by the F box protein Dsg1. Curr Microbiol. 2010:61(3):210-6.
36. Kumar PR, Yu Y, Sternglanz R, Johnston SA, Joshua-Tor L. NADP regulates the yeast GAL induction system. Science. 2008:319(5866):1090-2.
37. Jiang F, Frey BR, Evans ML, Friel JC, Hopper JE. Gene activation by dissociation of an inhibitor from a transcriptional activation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(20):5604-10.
38. Ahuatzi D, Herrero P, de la Cera T, Moreno F. The glucose-regulated nuclear localization of hexokinase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is Mig1-dependent. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(14):14440-6.
39. Ahuatzi D, Riera A, Pelaez R, Herrero P, Moreno F. Hxk2 regulates the phosphorylation state of Mig1 and therefore its nucleocytoplasmic distribution. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(7):4485-93.
40. Lutfyya LL, Iyer VR, DeRisi J, DeVit MJ, Brown PO, et al. Characterization of three related glucose repressors and genes they regulate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998;150(4):1377-91.
41. Sarma NJ, Haley TM, Barbara KE, Buford TD, Willis KA, et al. Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics. 2007;175(3):1127-35.
42. Moreno F, Ahuatzi D, Riera A, Palomino CA, Herrero P. Glucose sensing through the Hxk2-dependent signalling pathway. Biochem. Soc Trans. 2005; 33(Pt 1):265-8.
43. Westholm JO, Nordberg N, Muren E, Ameur A, Komorowski J, et al. Combinatorial control of gene expression by the three yeast repressors Mig1, Mig2 and Mig3. BMC Genomics. 2008;9(601):1-15.
44. Hertveldt K, Dechassa ML, Robben J, Volckaert G. Identifcation of Gal80p-interacting proteins by Saccharomyces cerevisiae whole genome phage display. Gene. 2003;307:141-9.