Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey

Food and Nutrition Research

Volumn 55, Issue , 2011, Pages

  De Keyzer, Willem ^a,b   Huybrechts, Inge ^b   De Vriendt, Veerle ^c   Vandevijvere, Stefanie ^d   Slimani, Nadia ^e   Van Oyen, Herman ^d   De Henauw, Stefaan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE GHENT   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^e INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Dietary assessment; Estimated dietary record; Relative validity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ASCORBIC ACID; CHOLESTEROL; FAT; FATTY ACID; IRON; RIBOFLAVIN; THIAMINE;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CALORIC INTAKE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; RECALL; STUDENT T TEST;

EQUUS ASINUS;

EID: 83755188084     PISSN: 16546628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7307     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brussaard JH, et al. A European food consumption survey method-conclusions and recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: S89-S94. (Pubitemid 41726645)
2. De Vriese S, et al. The Belgian food consumption survey: aims, design and methods. Arch Pub Health 2005; 63: 1-16.
3. Biro G, Hulshof K, Ovesen L, Cruz JA. Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: S25-S32. (Pubitemid 41726639)
4. Ferrari P, et al. Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 1329-45. (Pubitemid 36313622)
5. Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, Fuller WA. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 1440-9.
6. Guenther PM, Kott PS, Carriquiry AL. Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level. J Nutr 1997; 127: 1106-12. (Pubitemid 27242108)
7. Hoffmann K, et al. Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: S53-S62. (Pubitemid 41726642)
8. Slimani N, Valsta L. Perspectives of using the EPIC-SOFT programme in the context of pan-European nutritional monitoring surveys: methodological and practical implications. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: S63-S74. (Pubitemid 41726643)
9. Van Kappel A, Amoyel J, Slimani N, Vozar B, Riboli E. EPICSOFT picture book for estimation of food portion sizes. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1995.
10. Health Counsil Belgium. Household weights and measures. A manual for a standardised quantification of food items in Belgium. Brussels: Superior Health Counsil; 1997.
11. Nederlandse Unilever Bedrijven B.V. BECEL nutrient calculation program: Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 1995.
12. Willett W. Nature of variation in diet. Willett W, ed. Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998, p. 33-49.
13. NUBEL. Belgian food composition table. 4th ed. Brussels: Ministry of Public Health (in Dutch); 2004.
14. NUBEL. Database of trade names. 2005; Available from: www.internubel.be.
15. NEVO. NEVO-table, Dutch food composition table. Zeist: NEVO foundation (in Dutch); 2001.
16. Food Standards Agency (FSA). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. 6th summary ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2002.
17. Intstitut Paul Lambin (IPL). Table de Composition des Aliments. Bruxelles: Institut Paul Lambin; 2004.
18. Bedard D, Shatenstein B, Nadon S. Underreporting of energy intake from a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire completed by adults in Montreal. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 675-81. (Pubitemid 39049982)
19. Poslusna K, Ruprich J, de Vries JH, Jakubikova M, van't Veer P. Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. Br J Nutr 2009; 101: S73-85.
20. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S450-S6.
21. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 777-81. (Pubitemid 28211005)
22. Ainsworth BE, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S498-S516.
23. Black AE, Cole TJ. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. J Am Diet Assoc 2001; 101: 70-80. (Pubitemid 33712700)
24. Black AE, Cole TJ. Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 386-94. (Pubitemid 30261389)
25. Black AE. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 395-404. (Pubitemid 30261390)
26. Cole T. Sampling, study size and power.Margetts B, Nelson M, eds. Design concepts in nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 64-86.
27. Iowa State University. C-side. Software for intake distribution estimation. 1997; version 1.02. Available from: http://cssm.ias tate.edu/software/cside.html
28. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
29. Bingham SA, et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr 1994; 72: 619-43. (Pubitemid 24317368)
30. Holmes B, Dick K, Nelson MA. comparison of four dietary assessment methods in materially deprived households in England. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11: 444-56. (Pubitemid 351543431)
31. Buzzard M. 24-hour dietary recall and food record methods.- Willett W, ed.Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998, p. 50-73.
32. Bingham SA, et al. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br J Nutr 1995; 73: 531-50.
33. Melanson EL, Jr, Freedson PS. Validity of the computer science and applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 934-40.
34. Sirard JR, Melanson EL, Li L, Freedson PS. Field evaluation of the computer science and applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 695-700. (Pubitemid 30158345)
35. Ainslie P, Reilly T, Westerterp K. Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water. Sports Med 2003; 33: 683-98. (Pubitemid 36936535)
36. Plasqui G, Westerterp KR. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity 2007; 15: 2371-9. (Pubitemid 350034029)
37. Bassett DR, Jr., Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S471-S80.
38. Asbeck I, Mast M, Bierwag A, Westenhofer J, Acheson KJ, Muller MJ. Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 683-90.
39. Hirvonen T, Mannisto S, Roos E, Pietinen P. Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51: 297-301. (Pubitemid 27216396)
40. Price GM, Paul AA, Cole TJ, Wadsworth ME. Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. Br J Nutr 1997; 77: 833-51. (Pubitemid 27285490)
41. Lof M, Hannestad U, Forsum E. Comparison of commonly used procedures, including the doubly-labelled water technique, in the estimation of total energy expenditure of women with special reference to the significance of body fatness. Br J Nutr 2003; 90: 961-8. (Pubitemid 37328070)
42. Dodd KW, et al. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 1640-50. (Pubitemid 44415594)
43. Slimani N, et al. Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 900-17. (Pubitemid 32036945)
44. De Keyzer W, et al. Food photographs in nutritional surveillance: errors in portion size estimation using drawings of bread and photographs of margarine and beverages consumption. Br J Nutr 2011; 105: 1073-83.