The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and interpretability of molecular signatures

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2011, Pages

  Haury, Anne Claire ^a,b,c   Gestraud, Pierre ^a,b,c   Vert, Jean Philippe ^a,b,c  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBEDDED METHOD; FILTER METHOD; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC STABILITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR SIGNATURE; WRAPPER METHOD;

EID: 83755163963     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028210     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sotiriou C, Pusztai L, (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360: 790-800.
2. Ioannidis JPA, (2005) Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery? Lancet 365: 454.
3. Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, Domany E, (2005) Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 21: 171-178.
4. Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C, (2005) Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 365: 488-492.
5. Ein-Dor L, Zuk O, Domany E, (2006) Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 5923-5928.
6. Shen R, Chinnaiyan A, Ghosh D, (2008) Pathway analysis reveals functional convergence of gene expression profiles in breast cancer. BMC Med Genomics 1: 28.
7. Reyal F, Van Vliet M, Armstrong N, Horlings H, De Visser K, et al. (2008) A comprehensive analysis of prognostic signatures reveals the high predictive capacity of the proliferation, immune response and RNA splicing modules in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 10: R93.
8. Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, et al. (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a uni_ed understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10: R65.
9. Guyon I, Elisseeff A, (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3: 1157-1182.
10. Lai C, Reinders M, Van't Veer L, Wessels L, et al. (2006) A comparison of univariate and multivariate gene selection techniques for classification of cancer datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 235.
11. Abeel T, Helleputte T, Van de Peer Y, Dupont P, Saeys Y, (2010) Robust biomarker identification for cancer diagnosis with ensemble feature selection methods. Bioinformatics 26: 392-398.
12. Zou H, Hastie T, (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the Elastic Net. J R Stat Soc Ser B 67: 301-320.
13. Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P, (2010) Stability selection. J R Stat Soc Ser B 72: 417-473.
14. Kohavi R, John G, (1997) Wrappers for feature selection. Artif Intell 97: 273-324.
15. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V, (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46: 389-422.
16. Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J, Sapiro G, (2010) Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding. J Mach Learn Res 11: 19-60.
17. Tibshirani R, (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58: 267-288.
18. Bi J, Bennett K, Embrechts M, Breneman C, Song M, (2003) Dimensionality reduction via sparse support vector machines. J Mach Learn Res 3: 1229-1243.
19. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57: 289-300.
20. Wang J, Du Z, Payattakool R, Yu P, Chen C, (2007) A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms. Bioinformatics 23: 1274.
21. Barrett T, Troup D, Wilhite S, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, et al. (2009) NCBI GEO: archive for highthroughput functional genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D885.
22. Dai M, Wang P, Boyd A, Kostov G, Athey B, et al. (2005) Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucleic Acids Res 33: e175.
23. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, et al. (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level datas. Biostatistics 4: 249-264.
24. Fan C, Oh D, Wessels L, Weigelt B, Nuyten D, et al. (2006) Concordance among gene-expressionbased predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355: 560.
25. Abraham G, Kowalczyk A, Loi S, Haviv I, Zobel J, (2010) Prediction of breast cancer prognosis using gene set statistics provides signature stability and biological context. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 277.
26. Shi W, Bessarabova M, Dosymbekov D, Dezso Z, Nikolskaya T, et al. (2010) Functional analysis of multiple genomic signatures demonstrates that classification algorithms choose phenotype-related genes. Pharmacogenomics J 10: 310-23.
27. Iwamoto T, Pusztai L, (2010) Predicting prognosis of breast cancer with gene signatures: are we lost in a sea of data? Genome Med 2: 81.
28. Ambroise C, McLachlan G, (2002) Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6562-6566.
29. Simon R, Radmacher M, Dobbin K, McShane L, (2003) Pitfalls in the use of dna microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 14.
30. Pawitan Y, Bjoehle J, Amler L, Borg A, Egyhazi S, et al. (2005) Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy: derived and validated in two population-based cohorts. Breast Cancer Res 7: R953-R964.
31. Wang Y, Klijn J, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts A, Look M, et al. (2005) Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancers. Lancet 365: 671-679.
32. Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, et al. (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 262.
33. Ivshina A, George J, Senko O, Mow B, Putti T, et al. (2006) Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 66: 10292.