Phylogeny, diversity, and species delimitation of the North American Round-Nosed Minnows (Teleostei: Dionda), as inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 427-446

  Schönhuth, Susana ^a   Hillis, David M ^b   Neely, David A ^c   Lozano Vilano, Lourdes ^d   Perdices, Anabel ^e   Mayden, Richard L ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c Tennessee Aquarium Research Institute   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN   (Mexico)

^e MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Arid and semiarid regions; Conservation; Distinct lineages; Genetic diversity; Sequence analyses; Species complex

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPRINIFORMES; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MEXICO; MITOCHONDRIAL GENE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CYPRINIDAE; GENES, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENES, RAG-1; GENETIC VARIATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MEXICO; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; UNITED STATES;

CYPRINIDAE; DIONDA; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 83655201142     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abbott P.L. On the hydrology of the Edwards Limestone, south-central Texas. J. Hydrol. 1975, 24:251-269.
2. Agapow P.-M., Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Crandall K.A., Gittleman J.L., Mace G.M., Marshall J.C., Purvis A. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79:161-179.
3. Bonner T.H., Thomas C., Williams C.S., Karges J.P. Temporal assessment of a west Texas stream fish assemblage. Southwest. Nat. 2005, 50:74-106.
4. Cantu N.E.V., Winemiller K.O. Structure and habitat associations of Devils River fish assemblages. Southwest. Nat. 1997, 42:265-278.
5. Carson E.W., Hanna A.H., Garrett G.P., Gibson J.R., Gold J.R. Conservation genetics of cyprinid fishes (genus Dionda) in southwestern North America. II. Expansion of the known range of the Manantial Roundnose minnow, Dionda argentosa. Southwest. Nat. 2010, 55:576-581.
6. Chen W.-J., Bonillo C., Lecointre G. Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 26:262-288.
7. Chow S., Hazama K. Universal PCR primers for S7 ribosomal protein gene introns in fish. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7:1255-1256.
8. Conner J.V., Suttkus R.D. Zoogeography of freshwater fishes of the western Gulf Slope of North America. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes 1986, 413-456. Wiley, New York. C.H. Hocutt, E.O. Wiley (Eds.).
9. Cope E.D. On the zoological position of Texas. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 1880, 17:1-51.
10. Cowley D.E., Sublette J.E. Distribution of fishes in the Black River drainage, Eddy County, New Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 1987, 32:213-221.
11. Edwards R.J., Garrett G.P., Allan N.L. Aquifer-dependent fishes of the Edwards Plateau region. Aquifers of the Edwards Plateau 2004, 253-268. Texas Water Development Board, (Chapter 13). R.E. Mace, E.S. Angle, W.F. Mullican (Eds.).
12. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
13. Funk V.A., Brooks D.R. Phylogenetic Systematics as the Basis of Comparative Biology 1990, Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC, 45 pp.
14. Funk D.J., Omland F.E. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:397-423.
15. Garrett G.P., Edwards R.J., Price A.H. Distribution and status of the Devils River minnow, Dionda diaboli. Southwest. Nat. 1992, 37:259-267.
16. George A.L., Mayden R.L. Species concepts and the Endangered Species Act: how a valid biological definition of species enhances the legal protection of biodiversity. Nat. Resour. J. 2005, 45:369-407.
17. Gilbert C.R. Type catalog of recent and fossil North American freshwater fishes: families Cyprinidae, Catostomidae, Ictaluridae, Centrarchidae, and Elassomatidae. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 1998, 1:1-284.
18. Girard C. Researches upon the cyprinid fishes inhabiting the fresh waters of the United States of America west of the Mississippi Valley, from specimens in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 1856, 8:165-213.
19. Green D.M. Designatable units for status assessment of endangered species. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:1813-1820.
20. Hubbs C., Brown W.H. Dionda diaboli (Cyprinidae), a new minnow from Texas. Southwest. Nat. 1956, 1:69-77.
21. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F.R. Mr. Bayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
22. Jordan D.S., Evermann B.W. The fishes of North and Middle America: a descriptive catalogue of the species of fish-like vertebrates found in the waters of North America, north of the Isthmus of Panama. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 1896, 47:1-1240.
23. Jordan D.S., Gilbert H.C. Synopsis of the fishes of North America. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 1883, 16:1-1018.
24. Jordan D.S. Identification of the fishes of Cyprinidae and Catostomidae, described by Dr. Charles Girard, in the Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1856. U.S. Natl. Mus. 1885, 8:118-127.
25. Koster W.J. Guide to the fishes of New Mexico 1957, Univ. New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 116pp.
26. López J.A., Chen W.-J., Ortí G. Esociform phylogeny. Copeia 2004, 2004(3):449-464.
27. Lynch J.D. The gauge of speciation: on the frequency of modes of speciation. Speciation and Its Consequences 1989, 527-553. Sinnauer, Sunderland, MA. D.H. Otte, J.A. Endler (Eds.).
28. Mayden R.L., Matson R.H., Hillis D.M. Speciation in the North American Genus Dionda (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes 1992, 710-746. Standford Univ. Press, California. R.L. Mayden (Ed.).
29. Meek S.E. The fresh-water fishes of Mexico north of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Field Columbian Mus. Zool. Ser. 1904, 5:1-252.
30. Miller R.R. Taxonomic status of two nominal species of Mexican freshwater fishes (Cyprinidae). Copeia 1991, 1991(1):225-227.
31. Miller R.R., Minkley W.L., Norris S.M. Freshwater Fishes of Mexico 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 490pp. first ed.
32. Miller, M.A., Holder, M.T., Vos, R., Midford, P.E., Liebowitz, T., Chan, L., Hoover, P., Warnow, T., 2009. The CIPRES Portals. CIPRES. Archived by WebCite(r). (accessed 04.08.09). http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal.
33. Moore W.S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 1995, 49:718-726.
34. Moritz C. Applications of mitochondrial DNA in conservation: a critical review. Mol. Ecol. 1994, 3:403-413.
35. Pope, J., 1854. Reports of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Practicable and Economical Route for A Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean Made Under the Direction of the Secretary of War, in 1854-1855, According to Acts of Congress of March 3, 1853 May 31, 1854, and August 5. 1854, vol. 6, 33rd Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Exe. Doc. No. 78, Washington, DC.
36. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the models of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
37. Rojas M. The species problem and conservation: what are we protecting?. Conserv. Biol. 1992, 6:170-178.
38. Scharpf C. Annotated checklist of North American freshwater fishes including subspecies and undescribed forms, Part 1: Petromyzontidae through Cyprinidae. Am. Curr. Spec. Publ. 2005, 31:1-44.
39. Schönhuth, S., 2002. Sistemática, filogenia e implicaciones biogeográficas del género Notropis Rafinesque, 1817 (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) en el centro y sur de México. Ph. Diss., Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
40. Schönhuth S., Doadrio I. Phylogenetic relationships of Mexican minnows of the genus Notropis (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 80:323-337.
41. Schönhuth S., Mayden R.L. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Cyprinella (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Mol. Phylolgenet. Evol. 2010, 55:77-98.
42. Schönhuth S., Doadrio I., Mayden R.L. A biogeographic perspective on the phylogeny of Mexican cyprinids (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae). Studies of North American Desert Fishes in Honor of E.P. (Phil) Pister, Conservationist 2006, 102-124. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México. M.L. Lozano-Vilano, A.J. Contreras-Balderas (Eds.).
43. Schönhuth S., Doadrio I., Dominguez O., Hillis D.M., Mayden R.L. Molecular evolution of Southern North American Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii), with the description of the new genus Tampichthys from central Mexico. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47:729-756.
44. SEDESOL, 1994. México: Informe de la situación general en material de equilibrio ecológico y protección al ambiente 1993-1994. SEDESOL, México D.F., 376pp.
45. Smith M.L., Miller R.R. The evolution of the Rio Grande Basin as inferred from its fish fauna. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes 1986, 457-485. Wiley-Interscience Publications, New York. C.H. Hocutt, E.O. Wiley (Eds.).
46. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
47. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A fast bootstrapping algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:758-771.
48. Sublette J.E., Hatch M.D., Sublette M. The Fishes of New Mexico 1990, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 393pp.
49. Swofford, D.L., 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods) Version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
50. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The Clustal X windows interface. Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 24:634-640.
51. TWAP, 2008. Texas Wildlife Action Plan. http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/publications/pwdpubs/pwd_pl_w7000_1187a/.
52. Waples R.S. Evolutionarily significant units, distinct populations segments, and the endangered species act: reply to Pennock and Dimmick. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12:718-721.
53. Waples R.S., Adams P.B., Bohnsack J., Taylor B.L. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:964-974.
54. Warren M.L., Burr B.M., Walsh S.J., Bart H.L., Cashner R.C., Etnier D.A., Freeman B.J., Kuhajda B.R., Mayden R.L., Robison H.W., Ross S.T., Starnes W.C. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries, Conservation 2000, 25:7-29.
55. Wiens J.J., Penkrot T. Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:69-91.
56. Wiley E.O. Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics 1981, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 439pp.
57. Wiley E.O., Mayden R.L. Species and speciation in phylogenetic systematics, with examples from the North American fish fauna. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1985, 72:596-635.