Phylogenetic relationships of Mexican minnows of the genus Notropis (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 323-337

  Schönhuth, Susana ^a   Doadrio, Ignacio ^a  

^a MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Cyprinids; Cytochrome b; Mexico; Mitochondrial DNA; Trans Mexican volcanic belt

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENETICS;

ACTINOPTERYGII; CYPRINIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; HYBOPSIS; NOTROPIS; NOTROPIS BOUCARDI; NOTROPIS CALIENTIS; NOTROPIS IMELDAE; NOTROPIS MORALESI; NOTROPIS SALLAEI; NOTROPIS SHUMARDI; NOTROPIS TEXANUS; NOTROPIS VOLUCELLUS; YURIRIA ALTA;

EID: 19244387386     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00241.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Avise JC, Walker D. 1999. Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: Perspectives from an asexual transmitted genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 992-995.
2. Bailey RM. 1951. A check list of the fishes of Iowa, with keys for identification. In: Harlan JR, Speaker EB, eds. Iowa fish and fishing, 4th edn. Iowa: Iowa Conservation Commission, 1969, 327-377.
3. Barbour CD. 1973. A biogeographical history of Chirostoma (Pisces: Atherinidae): a species flock from the Mexican Plateau. Copeia 3: 533-556.
4. Bermingham E, Martin AP. 1998. Comparative mtDNA phylogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes: testing shared history to infer the evolutionary landscape of lower Central America. Molecular Ecology 7: 499-457.
5. Bielawski JP, Gold JR. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of cyprinid fishes in subgenus Notropis inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome 6 gene. Copeia 3: 656-667.
6. Burr BM, Mayden RL. 1981. Systematic, distribution and life history notes on Notropis chihuahua (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Copeia 2: 255-265.
7. Buth DG. 1979. Biochemical systematic of the cyprinid genus Notropis-I. The subgenus Luxilus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 7: 69-79.
8. Chernoff B, Miller RR. 1981. Systematics and variation of the Aztec shiner, Notropis sallei, a cyprinid fish from Central Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 94: 18-36.
9. Chernoff B, Miller RR. 1986. Fishes of the Notropis calientis complex with a key to the Southern Shiners of Mexico. Copeia 1: 170-183.
10. Coburn MM, Cavender TM. 1992. Interrelationships of North American cyprinid fishes. In: Mayden RL, ed. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 328-373.
11. Cortés MT. 1966. Consideraciones sobre el género Notropis y descripcíon de una especie nueva, procedente del río Atoyac, en Juchatengo, Oaxaca, México. [Considerations of the genus Notropis and description of a new species from the Atoyac river in Juchatengo, Oaxaca, Mexico.] Anales de la Escuela Nacional de cencias Biologicas 15: 185-192. (In Spanish).
12. De Buen F. 1955. El primer representante (Notropis moralesi nov. sp.) de la familia Cyprinidae en la fauna neo-tropical. [First record (Notropis moralesi nov. sp.) of the Cyprinidae family in the neotropical fauna.] Annales del Instituto de Biologia. Mexico XXVI: 527-541. (In Spanish).
13. Dimmick WW. 1987. Phylogenetic relationships of Notropis hubbsi, N. welaka and N. emiliae (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Copeia 2: 316-325.
14. Dowling TE, Naylor GJP. 1997. Evolutionary relationships of minnows in the genus Luxilus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) as determined from cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 1997: 758-765.
15. Espinosa H, Gaspar MT, Fuentes P. 1993. Listados faunísticos de México. III. Los peces dulceacuícolas mexicanos. [Catalogue of fauna from Mexico. III. Mexican freshwater fishes.] Argumedo RL, ed. Mexico: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (In Spanish).
16. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
17. Hendry PA, Vamosi SM, Latham SJ, Heilbuth JC, Day T. 2000. Questioning species realities. Conservation Genetics 1: 67-76.
18. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR. 2001. MR BAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
19. Johns GC, Avise JC. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1481-1490.
20. Machordom A, Doadrio I. 2001. Evidence of a Cenozoic Betic-Kabilian connection based on freshwater fish phylogeography (Luciobarbus, Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 252-263.
21. Martin AP, Bermingham E. 1998. Systematics and evolution of lower Central American cichlids inferred from analysis of cytochrome b gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 192-203.
22. Mateos M, Sanjur OI, Vrijenhoek RC. 2002. Historical biogeography of the livebearing fish genus Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae: Cyprinodontiformes). Evolution 56: 972-984.
23. Mayden RL. 1989. Phylogenetics studies of North American minnows, with emphasis on the genus Cyprinella (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). In: Mengel RM, Johnston RF, eds. Kansas: The University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History. Miscellaneous publication 80: 1-189.
24. Mayden RL. 1991. Cyprinids of the new world. In: Winfield IJ, Nelson JS, eds. Cyprinid fishes: systematics, biology and exploitation. London: Chapman & Hall, 240-263.
25. Miller RS, Smith ML. 1986. Origin and geography of the fishes of central Mexico. In: Hocutt CH, Wiley EO, eds. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publications, 487-519.
26. Miller RR, Williams DJ, Williams JE. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14: 22-37.
27. Nei M. 1987. DNA polymorphism within and between populations. In: Molecular evolutionary genetics. NY: Columbia University Press, 254-286.
28. Nei M, Li W-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 5269-5273.
29. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the models of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
30. Raley ME, Wood RM. 2001. Molecular systematics of members of the Notropis dorsalis species group (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae). Copeia 3: 683-645.
31. Rozas J, Rozas R. 1999. DnaSP, Vers. 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15: 174-175.
32. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
33. Schönhuth S. 2002. Sistemática, filogenia e implicaciones biogeográficas de las poblaciones del género Notropis Rafinesque, 1817 (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) en el centro y sur de México. [Systematics, phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical implications of the Mexican minnow's populations of the genus Notropis Rafinesque, 1817 (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) in central and south Mexico.] PhD Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain. (In Spanish).
34. Schönhuth S, De-Sostoa A, Martínez E, Doadrio I. 2001. Southern Mexican minnows of the genus Notropis (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae): Genetic variation, phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical implications. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 29: 359-377.
35. Shimodaira AM, Hasegawa M. 1999. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246-1247.
36. Simons AM, Mayden RL. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the creek chubs and the spine-fins: an enigmatic group of North American Cyprinid fishes (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae). Cladistics 13: 187-205.
37. Simons AM, Mayden RL. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the western North American Phoxinins (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) as inferred from mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 308-329.
38. Simons AM, Mayden RL. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of North American Cyprinids and assessment of homology of the Open Posterior Myodome. Copeia 1: 13-21.
39. Snelson PP. 1968. Systematics of the cyprinid fish Notropis amoenus with comments on the subgenus Notropis. Ibid 1968: 440-442.
40. Stein DW, Rogers JS, Cashner C. 1985. Biochemical systematics of the Notropis roseinipis Complex (Cyprinidae: subgenus Lythrurus). Copeia 1: 154-163.
41. Suzuki Y, Glazco G, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phytogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 16138-16143.
42. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4 0b8. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
43. Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huesenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO, Rogers JS. 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Systematic Biology 50: 525-539.
44. Vallejo de Aquino P. 1988. Análisis inmuno-taxonómico de N. sallaei y N. lermae (Pisces: Cyprinidae). [Immunotaxonomical analyses of Notropis sallaei and N. lermae (Pisces: Cyprinidae).] Thesis. Institute Politécnico Nacional. México D.F. (In Spanish).
45. Warren ML, Burr BM, Grady JM. 1994. Notropis albizonatus, a new cyprinid fish endemic to the Tennessee and Cluberland river drainages, with a phylogeny of the Notropis procne species group. Copeia 4: 868-886.
46. Weeb SA. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of the Goodeidae (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes). Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
47. Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 361-371.
48. Zardoya R, Doadrio I. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Iberian cyprinids: systematic and biogeographical implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 265: 1365-1372.
49. Zardoya R, Doadrio I. 1999. Molecular evidence on the evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of European cyprinids. Journal of Molecular Evolution 49: 227-237.