On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error

Epidemiology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 165-174

  Guo, Ying ^a   Little, Roderick J ^b   McConnell, Daniel S ^b  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEX HORMONE; SEX HORMONE BINDING GLOBULIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; COVARIANCE; EXTERNAL CALIBRATION SAMPLE; FEMALE; HORMONE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLE; SIMULATION; STATISTICS; SUMMARY STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEX HORMONE-BINDING GLOBULIN;

EID: 83655198171     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823a4386     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Morgan TM, Elashoff RM. Effect of covariate measurement error in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 1987;6:31-41. (Pubitemid 17017357)
2. Richardson S, Gilks WR. Conditional independence models for epidemiological studies with covariate measurement error. Stat Med. 1993; 12:1703-1722. (Pubitemid 23272636)
3. Zidek JV, Wong H, Le ND, Burnett R. Causality, measurement error and multicollinearity in epidemiology. Environmetrics. 1996;7:441-451.
4. Fung KY, Krewski D. On measurement error adjustment methods in Poisson regression. Environmetrics. 1999;10:213-224. (Pubitemid 29170692)
5. Sarkar S, Qu Y. Quantifying the treatment effect explained by markers in the presence of measurement error. Stat Med. 2007;26:1955-1963. (Pubitemid 46534086)
6. Jurek AM, Maldonado G, Greenland S, Church TR. Exposuremeasurement error is frequently ignored when interpreting epidemiologic study results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:871-876. (Pubitemid 46197153)
7. Higgins KM, Davidian M, Chew G, Burge H. The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay. Biometrics. 1998;54:19-32. (Pubitemid 28158780)
8. Browne RW, Whitcomb BW. Procedures for determination of detection limits: application to high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of fat-soluble vitamins in human serum. Epidemiology. 2010;21:S4-S9.
9. Guo Y, Little RJ. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error. Stat Med. 2011;30:2278-2294.
10. Carroll RJ, Stefanski LA. Approximate quasi-likelihood estimation in models with surrogate predictors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85:652-663.
11. Spiegelman D, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V. Efficient regression calibration for logistic regression in main study/internal validation study designs with an imperfect reference instrument. Stat Med. 2001;20:139-160.
12. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.
13. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1987.
14. Cole SR, Chu H, Greenland S. Multiple-imputation for measurementerror correction. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1074-1081.
15. Raghunathan TE. Combining information from multiple surveys for assessing health disparities. Allgemeines Stat Arch. 2006;90:515-526. (Pubitemid 44885435)
16. He Y, Zaslavsky AM. Combining information from cancer registry and medical records data to improve analyses of adjuvant cancer therapies. Biometrics. 2009;65:946-952.
17. Freedman LS, Midthune D, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V. A comparison of regression calibration, moment reconstruction and imputation for adjusting for covariate measurement error in regression. Stat Med. 2008;27: 5195-5216.
18. Sowers MR, Jannausch M, McConnell D, et al. Hormone predictors of bone mineral density changes during the menopausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:1261-1267.
19. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman Hall/CRC; 2006.
20. Reiter JP. Multiple imputation when records used for imputation are not used or disseminated for analysis. Biometrika. 2008;95:933-946.
21. Guolo A, Brazzale AR. A simulation-based comparison of techniques to correct for measurement error in matched case-control studies. Stat Med. 2008;27:3755-3775.