Procedures for determination of detection limits: Application to high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of fat-soluble vitamins in human serum

Epidemiology

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2010, Pages

  Browne, Richard W ^a   Whitcomb, Brian W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TOCOPHEROL; BETA CAROTENE; BETA CRYPTOXANTHIN; DELTA TOCOPHEROL; GAMMA TOCOPHEROL; LYCOPENE; RETINOL; TRACE ELEMENT; XANTHOPHYLL; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; VITAMIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; SERUM; VITAMIN BLOOD LEVEL; BLOOD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LIMIT OF DETECTION; PROCEDURES;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; HUMANS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; VITAMINS; BIOMARKERS;

EID: 77953913564     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ce9a61     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Armbruster DA, Tillman MD, Hubbs LM. Limit of detection (LOD)/limit of quantitation (LOQ): comparison of the empirical and the statistical methods exemplified with GC-MS assays of abused drugs. Clin Chem. 1994;40:1233-1238.
2. International Organization for Standardization. Capability of Detection\Part 1: Terms and Definitions (11843-1). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1997.
3. International Organization for Standardization. Capability of Detection\Part 2: Methodology in the Linear Calibration Case (11843-2). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2000.
4. International Organization for Standardization. Capability of Detection\Part 3: Methodology for Determination of the Critical Value for the Response Variable when No Calibration Data are Used (11843-3). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2001.
5. International Organization for Standardization. Capability of Detection\Part 4: Methodology for Comparing the Minimum Detectable Value with a Given Value (11843-4). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2001.
6. Tholen DW. Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline. NCCLS document EP17-A [ISBN 1-56238-551-8]. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2004.
7. Linnet K, Kondratovich M. A partly nonparametric procedure for determination of the limit of detection. Clin Chem. 2004;50:732-740.
8. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biologic variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59: 491-500.
9. Ricos C. Biologic variation database: the 2008 update. Desirable specifications for total error, imprecision, and bias, derived from biologic variation. Available at: http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Accessed November 4, 2009.
10. Linnet K. Estimation of the limit of detection with a bootstrap-derived standard error by a partly non-parametric approach. Application to HPLC drug assays. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43:394-399.
11. Higgins KM, Davidian M, Chew G, Burge H. The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay. Biometrics. 1998;54:19-32.
12. Browne RW, Armstrong D. Simultaneous determination of serum reti-nol, tocopherols and carotenoids by high pressure liquid chromatography. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;108:269-275.
13. Browne RW, Bloom MS, Schisterman EF, et al. Analytical and biological variation of biomarkers of oxidative stress during the menstrual cycle. Biomarkers. 2008;13:160-183.
14. Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF. Assays with lower detection limits: implications for epidemiological investigations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:597-602.
15. Guo Y, Harel O, Little RJ. How well quantified is the limit of quantification? Epidemiology. 2010;20:S10-S16.