Multiple imputation when records used for imputation are not used or disseminated for analysis

Biometrika

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 933-946

  Reiter, Jerome P ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Combining data; Confidentiality; Measurement error; Missing data; Multiple imputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 57249098827     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asn042     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ABOWD, J. M. & WOODCOCK, S. D. (2004). Multiply-imputing confidential characteristics and file links in longitudinal linked data. In Privacy in Statistical Databases, Ed. J. Domingo-Ferrer and V. Torra, pp. 290-7. New York: Springer.
2. BARNARD, J. & RUBIN, D. B. (1999). Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple-imputation. Biometrika 86, 948-55.
3. BROWNSTONE, D. & VALLETTA, R. G. (1996). Modeling earnings measurement error: a multiple imputation approach. Rev. Econ. Statist. 78, 705-17.
4. CLOGG, C. C., RUBIN, D. B., SCHENKER, N., SCHULTZ, B. & WEIDMAN, L. (1991). Multiple imputation of industry and occupation codes in census public-use samples using Bayesian logistic regression. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 86, 68-78.
5. COLE, S. R., CHU, H. & GREENLAND, S. (2006). Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction. Int. J. Epidemiol. 35, 1074-81.
6. DURRANT, G. B. & SKINNER, C. (2006). Using missing data methods to correct for measurement error in a distribution function. Survey Methodol. 32, 25-36.
7. GHOSH-DASTIDAR, B. & SCHAFER, J. L. (2003). Multiple edit/multiple imputation for multivariate continuous data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 98, 807-17.
8. HAREL, O. & ZHOU, X. H. (2006). Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias. Statist. Med. 25, 3769-86.
9. LI, K. H., MENG, X. L., RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. & RUBIN, D. B. (1991a). Significance levels from repeated p-values with multiply-imputed data. Statist. Sinica 1, 65-92.
10. LI, K. H., RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. & RUBIN, D. B. (1991b). Large-sample significance levels from multiply-imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distribution. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 86, 1065-73.
11. LITTLE, R. J. A. (1993). Statistical analysis of masked data. J. Offic. Statist. 9, 407-26.
12. MENG, X. L. & RUBIN, D. B. (1992). Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets. Biometrika 79, 103-11.
13. RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. (2006). Combining information from multiple surveys for assessing health disparities. Allgemeines Statist. Archiv. 90, 515-26.
14. RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. & SISCOVICK, D. S. (1998). Combining exposure information from multiple sources in the analysis of a case-control study. Statistician 47, 333-47.
15. RASSLER, S. (2003). A non-iterative Bayesian approach to statistical matching. Statist. Neer. 57, 58-74.
16. REITER, J. P. (2003). Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodol. 29, 181-9.
17. REITER, J. P. (2004). Simultaneous use of multiple imputation for missing data and disclosure limitation. Survey Methodol. 30, 235-42.
18. REITER, J. P. (2005a). Significance tests for multi-component estimands from multiply-imputed, synthetic microdata. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 131, 365-77.
19. REITER, J. P. (2005b). Using CART to generate partially synthetic, public use microdata. J. Offic. Statist. 21, 441-62.
20. REITER, J. P. (2007). Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing data. Biometrika 94, 502-8.
21. REITER, J. P. & RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. (2007). The multiple adaptations of multiple imputation. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 102, 1462-71.
22. RUBIN, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley.
23. RUBIN, D. B. (2003). Nested multiple imputation of NMES via partially incompatible MCMC. Statist. Neer. 57, 3-18.
24. RUBIN, D. B. & SCHENKER, N. (1987). Interval estimation from multiply-imputed data: a case study using census agriculture industry codes. J. Offic. Statist. 3, 375-87.
25. SCHAFER., J. & HAREL, O. (2002). Multiple imputation in two stages. In ASA Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, pp. 1359-63. Alexandria: VA, American Statistical Association.
26. SCHENKER, N. (2003). Assessing variability due to race bridging: application to census counts and vital rates for the year 2000. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 98, 818-28.
27. SCHENKER, N. & PARKER, J. D. (2003). From single-race reporting to multiple-race reporting: using imputation methods to bridge the transition. Statist. Med. 22, 1571-87.
28. SCHENKER, N. & RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. (2007). Combining information from multiple surveys to enhance estimation of measures of health. Statist. Med. 26, 1802-11.
29. YUCEL, R. M. & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2005). Imputation of binary treatment variables with measurement error in administrative data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 100, 1123-32.