Size assessment of breast lesions by means of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for magnetic resonance mammography;Valutazione della dimensione di lesioni mammarie con un sistema di CAD per risonanza magnetica mammografica

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1039-1049

  Levrini, G ^a   Sghedoni, R ^a   Mori, C ^a   Botti, A ^a   Vacondio, R ^a   Nitrosi, A ^a   Iori, M ^a   Nicoli, F ^a  

^a S MARIA NUOVA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

CAD; Dynamic contrast enhancement; Magnetic resonance mammography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 83655190667     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0664-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C. Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 356 378 17641361 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 (Pubitemid 47080868)
2. C. Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part II. Clinical applications Radiology 244 672 691 17709824 10.1148/radiol.2443051661 (Pubitemid 47292079)
3. A.J. Guidi L. Fischer J.R. Harris, et al. 1994 Microvesseldensity and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Natl Cancer Inst 86 614 619 7511693 10.1093/jnci/86.8.614 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7psVGnsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24143171)
4. K. Oshida T. Nagashima T. Ueda, et al. 2005 Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography Eur Radiol 15 1353 1360 15789211 10.1007/s00330-005-2661-9 (Pubitemid 40983517)
5. R. Gilles B. Zafrani J.-M. Guinebretiere, et al. 1995 Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathological correlation Radiology 196 415 419 7617854 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzktlWjtw%3D%3D
6. C.D. Lehman S. Peacock W.B. DeMartini X. Chen 2006 A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decrease sensitivity AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 51 56 16794155 10.2214/AJR.05.0269 (Pubitemid 46100145)
7. P. Belli M. Costantini C. Malaspina, et al. 2006 MRI accuracy in residual disease evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy Clin Radiol 61 946 953 17018307 10.1016/j.crad.2006.07.004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rovVaqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44464116)
8. S.C. Partridge J.E. Gibbs Y. Lu, et al. 2002 Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 1193 1199 12388497 (Pubitemid 35204372)
9. K. Akazawa Y. Tamaki T. Taguchi, et al. 2006 Preoperative evaluation of residual tumour extent by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy Breast J 12 130 137 16509837 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00220.x
10. S.C. Partridge J.E. Gibbs Y. Lu, et al. 2005 MRI measurements of breast tumour volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrent free survival AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 1174 1781
11. K. James E. Eisenhauer M. Christian, et al. 1999 Measuring response in solid tumours: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurements J Natl Cancer Inst 91 523 528 10088622 10.1093/jnci/91.6.523 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7os1CrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29157060)
12. S.C. Kaste T. Liu C.A. Billups, et al. 2004 Tumour size as a predictor of outcome in pediatric non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity Pediatr Blood Cancer 43 723 728 15390310 10.1002/pbc.20077 (Pubitemid 39557707)
13. W.B. Soutter J. Hanoch T. D'Arcy, et al. 2004 Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer BJOG 111 741 747 15198766 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004. 00172.x (Pubitemid 38869764)
14. V. Nicolet L. Carignan F. Bourdon, et al. 2000 MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach Radiographics 20 1539 1549 11112809 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gt12qtw%3D%3D
15. G. Levrini C.A. Mori R. Vacondio, et al. 2008 MRI patterns of invasive lobular cancers: T1 and T2 features Radiol Med 113 1110 1115 18800196 10.1007/s11547-008-0308-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7nslGktw%3D%3D
16. F. Sardanelli C. Boetes B. Borisch, et al. 2010 Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendation from the EUSOMA working group Eur J Cancer 46 1296 1316 20304629 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
17. F. Sardanelli M. Giuseppetti G. Canavese, et al. 2008 Indications for Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Consensus Document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007 Radiol Med 113 1085 1095 18953635 10.1007/s11547-008-0340-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7nslOjsg%3D%3D
18. T. Arazi-Kleinman P. Causer R. Jong, et al. 2009 Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population? Clin Radiol 64 1166 1174 19913125 10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.003 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1MjmtVyjtw%3D%3D
19. P. Baltzer C. Freiberg S. Beger, et al. 2009 Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach Acad Radiol 16 1070 1076 19523854 10.1016/j.acra.2009.03.017
20. C. Meeuwis van de Ven G. Stapper, et al. 2010 Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T Eur Radiol 20 522 528 19727750 10.1007/s00330-009-1573-5
21. W. Berg L. Gutierrez M. NessAiver 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830 849 15486214 10.1148/radiol.2333031484
22. L.J. Solin S.G. Orel W.-T. Hwang, et al. 2008 Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ J Clin Oncol 26 386 391 18202414 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5448 (Pubitemid 351171689)
23. S.H. Heywang-Kobrunner U. Bick W.G. Bradley Jr, et al. 2001 International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions Eur Radiol 11 531 546 11354744 10.1007/s003300000745 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3lsFeguw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32755488)