Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: Evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 522-528

  Meeuwis, Carla ^a   Van De Ven, Stephanie M ^b   Stapper, Gerard ^c   Fernandez Gallardo, Arancha M ^c   Van Den Bosch, Maurice A A J ^c   Mali, Willem P Th M ^c   Veldhuis, Wouter B ^c  

^a RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast; Computer assisted detection; Diagnosis; High field; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952305198     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1573-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116-124
2. Lehman CD, Peacock S, Demartini WB, Chen X (2006) A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:51-56
3. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 239:666-676
4. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K et al (2001) Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:889-895
5. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94-103
6. Leong CS, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ et al (2000) Characterization of breast lesion morphology with delayed 3DSSMT: an adjunct to dynamic breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:87-96
7. Deurloo EE, Muller SH, Peterse JL, Besnard AP, Gilhuijs KG (2005) Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions on MR images: potential effect of computerized assessment on clinical reading. Radiology 234:693-701
8. Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Besnard AP, Muller SH, Gilhuijs KG (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393-1401
9. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA (2005) Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. Am J Roentgenol 184:878-886
10. Kurz KD, Steinhaus D, Klar V, Cohnen M, Wittsack HJ, Saleh A, Mödder U, Blondin D (2009) Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 69(2):300-307
11. Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM (2007) Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89-95