Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 111, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 741-747

  Soutter, W Patrick ^a,c   Hanoch, Joseph ^a   D'Arcy, Tom ^a   Dina, Roberto ^a   McIndoe, G Angus ^a   DeSouza, Nandita M ^a,b  

^a HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADULT; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 3042745719     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00172.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Zheng J, et al. Tumor size evaluated by pelvic examination compared with 3-D quantitative analysis in the prediction of outcome for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39:395-404.
2. Lagasse LD, Creasman WT, Shingleton HM, Ford JH, Blessing JA. Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 1980;9:90-98.
3. LaPolla JP, Schlaerth JB, Gaddis O, Morrow CP. The influence of surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1986;24:194-206.
4. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Mangioni C. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997;350:535-540.
5. Burghardt E, Baltzer J, Tulusan AH, Haas J. Results of surgical treatment of 1028 cervical cancers studied with volumetry. Cancer 1992;70:648-655.
6. Trattner M, Graf AH, Lax S, et al. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:11-16.
7. Russell AH, Anderson M, Walter J, Kinney W, Smith L, Scudder S. The integration of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in treatment planning for gynecologic cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35:55-72.
8. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim HD, Lee HP, Han MC. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:633-640.
9. Wagenaar HC, Trimbos JBMZ, Postema S, et al. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:474-482.
10. deSouza NM, Whittle M, Williams AD, Sohail M, Krausz T, Soutter WP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in stage I cervical carcinoma: a comparison of endovaginal coil with external phased array coil techniques at 0.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:1020-1026.
11. deSouza NM, Scoones D, Krausz T, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP. High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia with a dedicated transvaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:553-559.
12. deSouza NM, McIndoe GA, Soutter WP, Krausz T, Chui KM, Mason WP. Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the pre-operative assessment of stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:500-507.
13. Winter R, Haas J, Reich O, et al. Parametrial spread of cervical cancer in patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynaecol Oncol 2002;84:252-257.
14. Baltzer J, Koepcke W. Tumor size and lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Arch Gynecol 1979;227:271-278.
15. Postems S, Pattynama PMT, van Rijswijk CSP, Trimbos JB. Cervical carcinoma: can dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging help predict tumour aggressiveness? Radiology 1999;210:217-220.
16. Hawighorst H. Dynamic MR imaging in cervical carcinoma. Radiology 1999;213:617-618.
17. Van Hoe L, Vanbeckevoort D, Oyen R, Itzlinger U, Vergote I. Cervical carcinoma: optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast-enhanced MR imaging - preliminary results. Radiology 1999;213:608-611.
18. Shepherd JH, Mould T, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:882-885.
19. Peppercorn PD, Jeyarajah AR, Woolas R, Shepherd JH, Oram DH, Reznek RH. Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience. Radiology 1999;212:395-399.
20. Ostor AG, Rome RM. Micro-invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 200 cases with long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1994;4:257-264.
21. Ebeling K, Bilek K, Johannsmeyer D, Rohde E, Wagner F, Rudiger KD. Microinvasive stage Ia cancer of the uterine cervix - results of a multicenter clinic based analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1989;49:776-781.
22. Whitney CW, Stehman FB. The abandoned radical hysterectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:350-356.
23. Delikatny EJ, Russell P, Hunter JC, Hancock R, Atkinson KH, Mountford CE. Proton MR and human cervical neoplasia: ex vivo spectroscopy allows distinction of invasive carcinoma of the cervix from carcinoma in situ and other preinvasive lesions. Radiology 1993;188:791-796.
24. Lee JH, Cho KS, Kim YM, et al. Localized in vivo 1H nuclear MR spectroscopy for evaluation of human uterine cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1279-1282.
25. Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:43-50.