Cationic glycopolymers for the delivery of pDNA to human dermal fibroblasts and rat mesenchymal stem cells

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1851-1862

  Kizjakina, Karina ^a   Bryson, Joshua M ^b   Grandinetti, Giovanna ^a   Reineke, Theresa M ^a,c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Techulon Inc   (United States)

^c University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; DNA; Drug Delivery; Nanoparticle; Polyethyleneoxide; Polymerization

Indexed keywords

CELL TYPES; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; END-GROUP FUNCTIONALITY; ENHANCED GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; GLYCOPOLYMERS; HUMAN DERMAL FIBROBLASTS; LIPOFECTAMINE; LUCIFERASE GENES; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PLASMID DNA (PDNA); PLASMID ENCODING; PLURIPOTENT; POLYMER REPEAT UNITS; POLYMER STRUCTURE; POLYPLEXES; PRIMARY CELLS; PROGENITOR CELL; SECONDARY AMINES; THREE PARAMETERS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; DNA; DRUG DELIVERY; FIBROBLASTS; FLUORESCENCE; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; GENE EXPRESSION; LIPOSOMES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOPARTICLES; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; POLYMERIZATION; RATS;

STEM CELLS;

COPOLYMER; ENHANCED GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; LIPOFECTAMINE; LUCIFERASE; PLASMID DNA; TREHALOSE; TREHALOSE OLIGOETHYLENEAMINE COPOLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE TARGETING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; POLYMER PRODUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SKIN FIBROBLAST;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CATIONS; DNA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOPARTICLES; PLASMIDS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; RATS; SKIN; TREHALOSE;

RATTUS;

EID: 83555179052     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126(4):663-676.
2. Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., Sutton G.G., et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001, 291(5507):1304-1351.
3. Schaffer D.V., Koerber J.T. Lim K-i. Molecular engineering of viral gene delivery vehicles. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2008, 10(1):169-194.
4. Alvarez-Breckenridge C., Kaur B., Chiocca E.A. Pharmacologic and chemical adjuvants in tumor virotherapy. Chem Rev 2009, 109(7):3125-3140.
5. Kovtun A., Heumann R., Epple M. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles for the transfection of cells. Biomed Mater Eng 2009, 19(2/3):241-247.
6. Epple M., Ganesan K., Heumann R., Klesing J., Kovtun A., Neumann S., et al. Application of calcium phosphate nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Mater Chem 2010, 20(1):18-23.
7. Bhattacharya S., Bajaj A. Advances in gene delivery through molecular design of cationic lipids. Chem Commun 2009, 31:4632-4656.
8. Rao N., Gopal V. Cell biological and biophysical aspects of lipid-mediated gene delivery. Biosci Rep 2006, 26(4):301-324.
9. Tros de Ilarduya C., Sun Y., Düzgünes N. Gene delivery by lipoplexes and polyplexes. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010, 40(3):159-170.
10. Ortiz Mellet C., Benito J., García Fernández J. Preorganized, macromolecular, gene-delivery systems. Chem Eur J 2010, 16(23):6728-6742.
11. Parekh H.S. The advance of dendrimers - a versatile targeting platform for gene/drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des 2007, 13(27):2837-2850.
12. Pietersz G.A., Choon-Kit T., Apostolopoulos V. Structure and design of polycationic carriers for gene delivery. Mini Rev Med Chem 2006, 6(12):1285-1298.
13. Mok H., Park T.G. Functional polymers for targeted delivery of nucleic acid drugs. Macromol Biosci 2009, 9(8):731-743.
14. Reineke T.M. Poly(glycoamidoamine)s: cationic glycopolymers for DNA delivery. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2006, 44(24):6895-6908.
15. Davis M.E., Pun S.H., Bellocq N.C., Reineke T.M., Popielarski S.R., Mishra S., et al. Self-assembling nucleic acid delivery vehicles via linear, water-soluble, cyclodextrin-containing polymers. Curr Med Chem 2004, 11(2):179-197.
16. Sizovs A., McLendon P.M., Srinivasachari S., Reineke T.M. Carbohydrate polymers for nonviral nucleic acid delivery. Top Curr Chem 2010, 1-60.
17. Davis M.E., Zuckerman J.E., Choi C.H.J., Seligson D., Tolcher A., Alabi C.A., et al. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature 2010, 464(7291):1067-1070.
18. Higano C.S., Schellhammer P.F., Small E.J., Burch P.A., Nemunaitis J., Yuh L., et al. Integrated data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 2009, 115(16):3670-3679.
19. Lipscomb M.F., Masten B.J. Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2002, 82(1):97-130.
20. Syme R., Glück S. Generation of dendritic cells: role of cytokines and potential clinical applications. Transfus Apher Sci 2001, 24(2):117-124.
21. Fong L., Engleman E.G. Dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol 2000, 18(1):245.
22. McNeish J. Embryonic stem cells in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004, 3(1):70-80.
23. Charge S.B.P., Rudnicki M.A. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev 2004, 84(1):209-238.
24. Grewal S.I.S., Moazed D. Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science 2003, 301(5634):798-802.
25. Rafii S., Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med 2003, 9(6):702.
26. Lechler R., Ng W.F., Steinman R.M. Dendritic cells in transplantation - friend or foe?. Immunity 2001, 14(4):357-368.
27. Wernig M., Meissner A., Foreman R., Brambrink T., Manching K., Hochedlinger K., et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007, 448(7151):318-324.
28. Prevette L.E., Lynch M.L., Kizjakina K., Reineke T.M. Correlation of amine number and pDNA binding mechanism for trehalose-based polycations. Langmuir 2008, 24(15):8090-8101.
29. Srinivasachari S., Liu Y., Prevette L.E., Reineke T.M. Effects of trehalose click polymer length on pDNA complex stability and delivery efficacy. Biomaterials 2007, 28(18):2885-2898.
30. Srinivasachari S., Liu Y., Zhang G., Prevette L., Reineke T.M. Trehalose click polymers inhibit nanoparticle aggregation and promote pDNA delivery in serum. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128(25):8176-8184.
31. Kojima H., Mukai Y., Yoshikawa M., Kamei K., Yoshikawa T., Morita M., et al. Simple PEG conjugation of SPIO via an Au-S bond improves its tumor targeting potency as a novel MR tumor imaging agent. Bioconjug Chem 2010, 21(6):1026-1031.
32. Jiang Y.-Y., Liu C., Hong M.-H., Zhu S.-J., Pei Y.-Y. Tumor cell targeting of transferrin-PEG-TNF-α conjugate via a receptor-mediated delivery system: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Bioconjug Chem 2006, 18(1):41-49.
33. Davis M.E. The first targeted delivery of siRNA in humans via a self-assembling, cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticle: from concept to clinic. Mol Pharm 2009, 6(3):659-668.
34. Veale E.B., O'Brien J.E., McCabe T., Gunnlaugsson T. The synthesis, N-alkylation and epimerisation study of a phthaloyl derived thiazolidine. Tetrahedron 2008, 64(28):6794-6800.
35. García Fernández J., Ortiz Mellet C., Jiménez Blanco J., Fuentes Mota J., Gadelle A., Coste-Sarguet A., et al. Isothiocyanates and cyclic thiocarbamates of [alpha], [alpha]'-trehalose, sucrose, and cyclomaltooligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res 1995, 268(1):57-71.
36. Menger F.M., Mbadugha B.N.A. Gemini surfactants with a disaccharide spacer. J Am Chem Soc 2001, 123(5):875-885.
37. Reineke T.M., Davis M.E. Structural effects of carbohydrate-containing polycations on gene delivery. 1. Carbohydrate size and its distance from charge centers. Bioconjug Chem 2002, 14(1):247-254.
38. Abdel-Magid A.F., Carson K.G., Harris B.D., Maryanoff C.A., Shah R.D. Reductive amination of aldehydes and ketones with sodium triacetoxyborohydride. Studies on direct and indirect reductive amination procedures. J Org Chem 1996, 61(11):3849-3862.
39. Qin A., Lam J.W.Y., Tang B.Z. Click polymerization: progresses, challenges, and opportunities. Macromolecules 2010, 43(21):8693-8702.
40. Golas P.L., Matyjaszewski K. Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: expanding the scope of polymeric materials. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39(4):1338-1354.
41. Finn M.G., Fokin V.V. Click chemistry: function follows form. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39(4):1231-1232.
42. Liu Y.M., Reineke T.M. Poly(glycoamidoamine)s for gene delivery. Structural effects on cellular internalization, buffering capacity, and gene expression. Bioconjug Chem 2007, 18(1):19-30.
43. Liu Y.M., Wenning L., Lynch M., Reineke T.M. Gene delivery with novel poly(1-tartaramidoamine)s. ACS Symp Ser 2006, pp. 217-27.
44. Liu Y.M., Reineke T.M. Hydroxyl stereochemistry and amine number within poly(glycoamidoamine)s affect intracellular DNA delivery. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127(9):3004-3015.
45. Liu Y.M., Wenning L., Lynch M., Reineke T.M. New poly(D-glucaramidoamine)s induce DNA nanoparticle formation and efficient gene delivery into mammalian cells. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126(24):7422-7423.
46. Lee C.C., Liu Y., Reineke T.M. General structure-activity relationship for poly(glycoamidoamine)s: the effect of amine density on cytotoxicity and DNA delivery efficiency. Bioconjug Chem 2008, 19(2):428-440.