Vertebral fracture risk and alendronate effects on osteoporosis assessed by a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 645-651

  Imai, Kazuhiro ^a,b  

^a Mishuku Hospital   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alendronate; Bone mechanics; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

ALENDRONIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRABECULAR BONE; TREATMENT DURATION; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; VOLUMETRY;

ALENDRONATE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; SPINAL FRACTURES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 83055194707     PISSN: 09148779     EISSN: 14355604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-011-0281-9     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785-795
2. JA Kanis P Delmas P Burckhardt C Cooper D Torgerson 1997 Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease Osteoporos Int 7 390 406 9373575 10.1007/BF01623782 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FktV2jtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27346422)
3. World Health Organization 1994 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843 1 129
4. SJ Edmondston KP Singer RE Day PD Breidahl RI Price 1994 In vitro relationships between vertebral body density, size and compressive strength in the elderly thoracolumbar spine Clin Biomech 9 180 186 10.1016/0268-0033(94) 90019-1
5. XG Cheng PH Nicholson S Boonen G Lowet P Brys J Aerssens G Van der Perre J Dequeker 1997 Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound J Bone Miner Res 12 1721 1728 9333134 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1721 1:STN:280:DyaK2svnt1altg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27422374)
6. BS Myers KB Arbogast B Lobaugh KD Harper WJ Richardson MK Drezner 1994 Improved assessment of lumbar vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 9 687 693 8053398 10.1002/jbmr.5650090514 1:STN:280:DyaK2czjtVCjsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24130470)
7. K Bjarnason C Hassager OL Svendsen H Stang C Christiansen 1996 Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: comparison with hip and forearm measurement Osteoporos Int 6 37 42 8845598 10.1007/BF01626536 1:STN:280:DyaK28vgt1Sitw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26046290)
8. D Marshall O Johnell H Wedel 1996 Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures BMJ 312 1254 1259 8634613 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254 1:STN:280:DyaK283isFejtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26147662)
9. WA Brekelmans HW Poort TJ Slooff 1972 A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts Acta Orthop Scand 43 301 317 4651051 10.3109/17453677208998949 1:STN:280:DyaE3s%2FptlGhtg%3D%3D
10. R Huiskes EY Chao 1983 A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade J Biomech 16 385 409 6352706 10.1016/0021- 9290(83)90072-6 1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2FgvVagsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 13014399)
11. KG Faulkner CE Cann BH Hasegawa 1991 Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis Radiology 179 669 674 2027972 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3islCktA%3D%3D
12. DD Cody GJ Gross FJ Hou HJ Spencer SA Goldstein DP Fyhrie 1999 Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA J Biomech 32 1013 1020 10476839 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00099-8 1:STN:280: DyaK1MvgsVCruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29356040)
13. JH Keyak SA Rossi KA Jones HB Skinner 1998 Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling J Biomech 31 125 133 9593205 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3lsVSgtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28195808)
14. JH Keyak SA Rossi KA Jones CM Les HB Skinner 2001 Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models Med Eng Phys 23 657 664 11755810 10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00094-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FksFygtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34072903)
15. JH Keyak 2001 Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models Med Eng Phys 23 165 173 11410381 10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00045-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzkslOnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32532058)
16. M Bessho I Ohnishi J Matsuyama T Matsumoto K Imai K Nakamura 2007 Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method J Biomech 40 1745 1753 17034798 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.08.003 (Pubitemid 46702134)
17. MJ Silva TM Keaveny WC Hayes 1998 Computed tomography-based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections J Orthop Res 16 300 308 9671924 10.1002/jor.1100160305 1:STN:280:DyaK1czjsFKntw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28337625)
18. H Martin J Werner R Andresen HC Schober KP Schmitz 1998 Noninvasive assessment of stiffness and failure load of human vertebrae from CT-data Biomed Tech 43 82 88 10.1515/bmte.1998.43.4.82 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nsVehtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28210866)
19. JM Buckley K Loo J Motherway 2007 Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral strength Bone 40 767 774 17174619 10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.025 (Pubitemid 46187225)
20. RP Crawford CE Cann TM Keaveny 2003 Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography Bone 33 744 750 14555280 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2 (Pubitemid 37222401)
21. MA Liebschner DL Kopperdahl WS Rosenberg TM Keaveny 2003 Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine Spine 28 559 565 12642762 (Pubitemid 36343744)
22. K Imai I Ohnishi M Bessho K Nakamura 2006 Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site Spine 31 1789 1794 16845352 10.1097/01.brs.0000225993.57349.df (Pubitemid 44079505)
23. K Imai I Ohnishi S Yamamoto K Nakamura 2008 In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model Spine 33 27 32 18165745 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3993
24. H Orimo Y Hayashi M Fukunaga T Sone S Fujiwara M Shiraki K Kushida S Miyamoto S Soen J Nishimura Y Oh-Hashi T Hosoi I Gorai H Tanaka T Igai H Kishimoto 2001 Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision J Bone Miner Metab 19 331 337 11685647 10.1007/s007740170001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvFGntw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33041725)
25. K Imai I Ohnishi T Matsumoto S Yamamoto K Nakamura 2009 Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method Osteoporosis Int 20 801 810 10.1007/s00198-008-0750-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3ltVeltA%3D%3D
26. LJ Melton III BL Riggs TM Keaveny SJ Achenbach PF Hoffmann JJ Camp PA Rouleau ML Bouxsein S Amin EJ Atkinson RA Robb S Khosla 2007 Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk J Bone Miner Res 22 1885 1892 17680721 10.1359/jbmr.070728 (Pubitemid 351229305)
27. TM Keaveny DW Donley PF Hoffmann BH Mitlak EV Glass JA San Martin 2007 Effects of teriparatide and alendronate on vertebral strength as assessed by finite element modeling of QCT scans in women with osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 22 149 157 17042738 10.1359/jbmr.061011 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVWnurk%3D (Pubitemid 46032608)
28. MR McClung J San Martin PD Miller R Civitelli F Bandeira M Omizo DW Donley GP Dalsky EF Eriksen 2005 Opposite bone remodeling effects of teriparatide and alendronate in increasing bone mass Arch Intern Med 165 1762 1768 16087825 10.1001/archinte.165.15.1762 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpslGgs7c%3D (Pubitemid 41138965)
29. DM Black SL Greenspan KE Ensrud L Palermo JA McGowan TF Lang P Garnero ML Bouxsein JP Bilezikian CJ Rosen 2003 The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis N Engl J Med 349 1207 1215 14500804 10.1056/NEJMoa031975 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXns1Kmsrw%3D (Pubitemid 37152030)
30. G Dougherty D Newman 1999 Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: a simulation study Med Phys 26 1341 1348 10435536 10.1118/1.598629 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzmtFyruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29334802)
31. S Prevrhal K Engelke WA Kalender 1999 Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters Phys Med Biol 44 751 764 10211808 10.1088/0031-9155/44/3/017 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3is1Oqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29133067)
32. SR Cummings DB Karpf F Harris HK Genant K Ensrud AZ LaCroix DM Black 2002 Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs Am J Med 112 281 289 11893367 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)01124-X 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhvVWkurk%3D (Pubitemid 34219441)
33. T Matsumoto I Ohnishi M Bessho K Imai S Ohashi K Nakamura 2009 Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method Spine 34 1464 1469 19525837 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a55636