All words domain adapted WSD: Finding a middle ground between supervision and unsupervision

ACL 2010 - 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1532-1541

  Khapra, Mitesh M ^a   Kulkarni, Anup ^a   Sohoney, Saurabh ^a   Bhattacharyya, Pushpak ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASELINE ACCURACY; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; GENERAL PURPOSE; MIXED DOMAINS; TRAINING CORPUS; WORD-SENSE DISAMBIGUATION; WORDNET;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 83055186473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Eneko Agirre and Oier Lopez de Lacalle. 2009. Supervised domain adaption for wsd. In EACL '09: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 42-50, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Eneko Agirre and David Martinez. 2004. The effect of bias on an automatically-built word sense corpus. In Proceedings of the 4rd International Conference on Languages Resources and Evaluations (LREC).
3. Eneko Agirre, Oier Lopez de Lacalle, Christiane Fellbaum, Andrea Marchetti, Antonio Toral, and Piek Vossen. 2009a. Semeval-2010 task 17: all-words word sense disambiguation on a specific domain. In DEW '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions, pages 123-128, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Eneko Agirre, Oier Lopez De Lacalle, and Aitor Soroa. 2009b. Knowledge-based wsd on specific domains: Performing better than generic supervised wsd. In In Proceedings of IJCAI.
5. Satanjeev Banerjee and Ted Pedersen. 2002. An adapted lesk algorithm for word sense disambiguation using wordnet. In CICLing '02: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 136-145, London, UK. Springer-Verlag.
6. Yee Seng Chan and Hwee Tou Ng. 2007. Domain adaptation with active learning for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 49-56, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Gerard Escudero, Lluís Màrquez, and German Rigau. 2000. An empirical study of the domain dependence of supervised word sense disambiguation systems. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora, pages 172-180, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. C. Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database.
9. J.J. Jiang and D.W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. of the Int'l. Conf. on Research in Computational Linguistics, pages 19-33.
10. Mitesh Khapra, Sapan Shah, Piyush Kedia, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2010. Domain-specific word sense disambiguation combining corpus based and wordnet based parameters. In 5th International Conference on Global Wordnet (GWC2010).
11. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, pages 423-430.
12. Rob Koeling, Diana McCarthy, and John Carroll. 2005. Domain-specific sense distributions and predominant sense acquisition. In HLT '05: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and EmpiricalMethods in Natural Language Processing, pages 419-426, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics, pages 768-774,Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Diana McCarthy, Rob Koeling, Julie Weeds, and John Carroll. 2004. Finding predominant word senses in untagged text. In ACL '04: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 279, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Diana McCarthy, Rob Koeling, Julie Weeds, and John Carroll. 2007. Unsupervised acquisition of predominant word senses. Comput. Linguist., 33(4):553-590.
16. George A. Miller, Claudia Leacock, Randee Tengi, and Ross T. Bunker. 1993. A semantic concordance. In HLT '93: Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 303-308, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Hwee Tou Ng and Hian Beng Lee. 1996. Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: an exemplar-based approach. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 40-47, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Siddharth Patwardhan and Ted Pedersen. 2003. The cpan wordnet::similarity package. http://search.cpan.org/ sid/wordnet-similarity/.
19. Benjamin Snyder and Martha Palmer. 2004. The english all-words task. In Rada Mihalcea and Phil Edmonds, editors, Senseval-3: Third International Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text, pages 41-43, Barcelona, Spain, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Marc Weeber, James G. Mork, and Alan R. Aronson. 2001. Developing a test collection for biomedical word sense disambiguation. In In Proceedings of the AMAI Symposium, pages 746-750.