Domain-specific sense distributions and predominant sense acquisition

HLT/EMNLP 2005 - Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 419-426

  Koeling, Rob ^a   McCarthy, Diana ^a   Carroll, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

AUTOMATIC METHOD; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; ENGLISH WORD; LARGE MARGINS; MIXED DOMAINS; TARGET DOMAIN; WORD-SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34347360806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220575.1220628     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ted Briscoe and John Carroll. 2002. Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. In Proceedings of LREC-2002, pages 1499-1504, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
2. William Gale, Kenneth Church, and David Yarowsky. 1992. One sense per discourse. In Proceedings of the 4th DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 233-237.
3. Jay Jiang and David Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan.
4. Adam Kilgarriff. 2004. How dominant is the commonest sense of a word? In Proceedings of Text, Speech, Dialogue, Brno, Czech Republic.
5. Lillian Lee. 1999. Measures of distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 25-32.
6. Geoffrey Leech. 1992. 100 million words of English: the British National Corpus. Language Research, 28(1):1-13.
7. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL 98, Montreal, Canada.
8. Bernardo Magnini and Gabriela Cavaglià. 2000. Integrating subject field codes into WordNet. In Proceedings of LREC-2000, Athens, Greece.
9. Bernardo Magnini, Carlo Strapparava, Giovanni Pezzulo, and Alfio Gliozzo. 2002. The role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. Natural Language Engineering, 8(4):359-373.
10. Diana McCarthy, Rob Koeling, Julie Weeds, and John Carroll. 2004. Finding predominant senses in untagged text. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 280-287, Barcelona, Spain.
11. Rada Mihalcea, Timothy Chklovski, and Adam Kilgariff. 2004. The SENSEVAL-3 English lexical sample task. In Proceedings of the SENSEVAL-3 workshop, pages 25-28.
12. George A. Miller, Claudia Leacock, Randee Tengi, and Ross T Bunker. 1993. A semantic concordance. In Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 303-308. Morgan Kaufman.
13. Siddharth Patwardhan and Ted Pedersen. 2003. The cpan wordnet::similarity package. http://search.cpan.org/∼sid/WordNet-Similarity/.
14. Tony G. Rose, Mark Stevenson, and Miles Whitehead. 2002. The Reuters Corpus Volume 1 - from yesterday's news to tomorrow's language resources. In Proceedings of LREC-2002, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
15. Benjamin Snyder and Martha Palmer. 2004. The English all-words task. In Proceedings of SENSEVAL-3, pages 41-43, Barcelona, Spain.
16. David Yarowsky and Radu Florian. 2002. Evaluating sense disambiguation performance across diverse parameter spaces. Natural Language Engineering, 8(4):293-310.