Supervised domain adaption for WSD

EACL 2009 - 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 42-50

  Agirre, Eneko ^a   DeLacalle, Oier Lopez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN ADAPTATION; DOMAIN ADAPTIONS; ERROR REDUCTION; GENERAL SOURCE; UNLABELED DATA;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 78649842062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1609067.1609071     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Eneko Agirre and Oier Lopez de Lacalle. 2007. Ubcalm: Combining k-nn with svd for wsd. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 342-345, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Eneko Agirre and Oier Lopez de Lacalle. 2008. On robustness and domain adaptation using SVD for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 17-24, Manchester, UK, August. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.
3. Eneko Agirre and David Martinez. 2004. The effect of bias on an automatically-built word sense corpus. Proceedings of the 4rd International Conference on Languages Resources and Evaluations (LREC).
4. E. Agirre, O. Lopez de Lacalle, and David Martinez. 2005. Exploring feature spaces with svd and unlabeled data for Word Sense Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Advances on Natural Language Processing (RANLP'05), Borovets, Bulgaria.
5. Rie Kubota Ando. 2006. Applying alternating structure optimization to word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 77-84, New York City.
6. John Blitzer, Ryan McDonald, and Fernando Pereira. 2006. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 120-128, Sydney, Australia, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Yee Seng Chan and Hwee Tou Ng. 2007. Domain adaptation with active learning for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 49-56, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Ciprian Chelba and Alex Acero. 2004. Adaptation of maximum entropy classifier: Little data can help a lot. In Proceedings of of th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Barcelona, Spain.
9. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2006. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26: 101-126.
10. Hal Daumé III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256-263, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Scott Deerwester, Susan Dumais, Goerge Furnas, Thomas Landauer, and Richard Harshman. 1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 391-407.
12. Gerard Escudero, Lluiz Marquez, and German Rigau. 2000. An Empirical Study of the Domain Dependence of Supervised Word Sense Didanbiguation Systems. Proceedings of the joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, EMNLP/VLC.
13. C. Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.
14. Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Claudio Giuliano, and Carlo Strapparava. 2005. Domain Kernels for Word Sense Disambiguation. 43nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (ACL-05).
15. R. Koeling, D. McCarthy, and J. Carroll. 2005. Domain-specific sense distributions and predominant sense acquisition. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. HLT/EMNLP, pages 419-426, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
16. G. Leech. 1992. 100 million words of English: the British National Corpus. Language Research, 28(1): 1-13.
17. David Martínez and Eneko Agirre. 2000. One Sense per Collocation and Genre/Topic Variations. Conference on Empirical Method in Natural Language.
18. T. Pedersen. 2001. A Decision Tree of Bigrams is an Accurate Predictor of Word Sense. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-01), Pittsburgh, PA.
19. Sameer Pradhan, Edward Loper, Dmitriy Dligach, and Martha Palmer. 2007. Semeval-2007 task-17: English lexical sample, srl and all words. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 87-92, Prague, Czech Republic.
20. Tony G. Rose, Mark Stevenson, and Miles Whitehead. 2002. The reuters corpus volumen 1 from yesterday's news to tomorrow's language resources. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2002), pages 827-832, Las Palmas, Canary Islands.
21. Sarah Zelikovitz and Haym Hirsh. 2001. Using LSI for text classification in the presence of background text. In Henrique Paques, Ling Liu, and David Grossman, editors, Proceedings of CIKM-01, 10th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 113-118, Atlanta, US. ACM Press, New York, US.
22. Zhi Zhong, Hwee Tou Ng, and Yee Seng Chan. 2008. Word sense disambiguation using OntoNotes: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1002-1010, Honolulu, Hawaii, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.