SemEval-2010 task 17: All-wordsWord sense disambiguation on a specific domain

SEW 2009 - Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions at the 2009 North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2009 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 123-128

  Agirre, Eneko ^a   De Lacalle, Oier Lopez ^a   Fellbaum, Christiane ^b   Marchetti, Andrea ^c   Toral, Antonio ^c   Vossen, Piek ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY   (Spain)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL TESTS;

OVERALL DESIGN; SUPERVISED SYSTEMS; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION SYSTEMS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85120058085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Eneko Agirre and Oier Lopez de Lacalle. 2008. On robustness and domain adaptation using SVD for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 17-24, Manchester, UK, August. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.
2. Eneko Agirre and Oier Lopez de Lacalle. 2009. Supervised domain adaptation for wsd. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-09).
3. E. Agirre, O. Lopez de Lacalle, and A. Soroa. 2009. Knowledge-based WSD and specific domains: Performing over supervised WSD. In Proceedings of IJCAI, Pasadena, USA.
4. John Blitzer, Ryan McDonald, and Fernando Pereira. 2006. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 120-128, Sydney, Australia, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Yee Seng Chan and Hwee Tou Ng. 2007. Domain adaptation with active learning for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 49-56, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Ciprian Chelba and Alex Acero. 2004. Adaptation of maximum entropy classifier: Little data can help a lot. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Barcelona, Spain.
7. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2006. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:101-126.
8. Hal Daumé III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256-263, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Gerard Escudero, Lluiz Márquez, and German Rigau. 2000. An Empirical Study of the Domain Dependence of Supervised Word Sense Disambiguation Systems. Proceedings of the joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, EMNLP/VLC.
10. C. Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.
11. A. Kilgarriff. 2001. English Lexical Sample Task Description. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Systems, Toulouse, France.
12. R. Koeling, D. McCarthy, and J. Carroll. 2005. Domainspecific sense distributions and predominant sense acquisition. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. HLT/EMNLP, pages 419-426, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
13. G. Leech. 1992. 100 million words of English: the British National Corpus. Language Research, 28(1):1-13.
14. David Martínez and Eneko Agirre. 2000. One Sense per Collocation and Genre/Topic Variations. Conference on Empirical Method in Natural Language.
15. R. Mihalcea, T. Chklovski, and Adam Killgariff. 2004. The Senseval-3 English lexical sample task. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACL workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text (SENSEVAL), Barcelona, Spain.
16. G.A. Miller, C. Leacock, R. Tengi, and R.Bunker. 1993. A Semantic Concordance. In Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop. Distributed as Human Language Technology by San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers., pages 303-308, Princeton, NJ.
17. Hwee Tou Ng and Hian Beng Lee. 1996. Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: An exemplar-based approach. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computationla Linguistics (ACL), pages 40-47.
18. Nicoletta Calzolari Christiane Fellbaum Shu-kai Hsieh Chu-Ren Huang Hitoshi Isahara Kyoko Kanzaki Andrea Marchetti Monica Monachini Federico Neri Remo Raffaelli German Rigau Maurizio Tescon Piek Vossen, Eneko Agirre and Joop VanGent. 2008. Kyoto: a system for mining, structuring and distributing knowledge across languages and cultures. In European Language Resources Association (ELRA), editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco, may.
19. Sameer Pradhan, Edward Loper, Dmitriy Dligach, and Martha Palmer. 2007. Semeval-2007 task-17: English lexical sample, srl and all words. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 87-92, Prague, Czech Republic.
20. Tony G. Rose, Mark Stevenson, and Miles Whitehead. 2002. The Reuters Corpus Volumen 1: from Yesterday's News to Tomorrow's Language Resources. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2002), pages 827-832, Las Palmas, Canary Islands.
21. Marc Weeber, James G. Mork, and Alan R. Aronson. 2001. Developing a test collection for biomedical word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the AMAI Symposium, pages 746-750, Washington, DC.
22. Zhi Zhong, Hwee Tou Ng, and Yee Seng Chan. 2008. Word sense disambiguation using OntoNotes: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1002-1010, Honolulu, Hawaii, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.