What's in a name? coverage of senator Hillary Clinton during the 2008 democratic primary

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 884-896

  Uscinski, Joseph E ^a   Goren, Lilly J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

gender bias; Hillary Clinton; news; primary election

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955228873     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1065912910382302     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aday S.,Devitt J.Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth Dole's presidential bid.Harvard Journal of Press/Politics. 2001;6 (2): 52-73.
2. Akindele Dele Feme.Sesotho address forms.Linguistic Online. 2008;34 (2): 3-15.
3. Anderson Karrin Vasby,Sheeler Kristina HornGoverning codes: Gender, metaphor, political identity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2005:.
4. Bae Hyuhn-Bae.Product differentiation in cable programming: The case in the cable national all-news networks.Journal of Media Economics. 1999;12 (4): 265-77.
5. Banaji M.,Greenwald A. G.The psychology of prejudice 7. Zanna M. P.Olson J. M., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994:55-76.
6. Baum Mathew A.Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (1): 91-109.
7. Baum Matthew A.Circling the wagons: Soft news and isolationism in American public opinion.International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48 (2): 313-38.
8. Baum Matthew A.,Groeling Tim.New media and the polarization of American political discourse.Political Communication. 2008;25 (4): 345-65.
9. Berinsky A.The two faces of public opinion.American Journal of Political Science. 1999;43:1209-30.
10. Blumberg Rae Lesser.A general theory of gender stratification.Sociological Theory. 1984;2:23-101.
11. Braden M.Women politicians and the media. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky; 1996:.
12. Brown Mary Ellen.Feminism and cultural politics: Television audiences and Hilary Rodham Clinton.Political Communication. 1997;14 (2): 255-70.
13. Brown R.Social psychology. New York: Free Press; 1965:.
14. Brown R.,Ford M.Address in American English.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961;62:375-85.
15. Burden Barry C.,Mughan Anthony.Public opinion and Hillary Rodham Clinton.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1999;63 (2): 237-50.
16. Bystrom Dianne G.,Banwart Mary Christine,Kaid Linda Lee,Robertson Terry A.Gender and candidate communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewsStyle. London: Routledge; 2004:.
17. Carlin Diana,Winfrey Kelly.Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage.Communication Studies. 2009;60 (4): 326-43.
18. Carroll S. J.Reflections on gender and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign: The good, the bad, and the misogynic.Politics & Gender. 2009;5 (1): 1-20.
19. Cowan Gloria,Kasen Jill.Form of reference: Sex differences in letters of recommendation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984;46 (3): 636-45.
20. Deutsch Francine M.Undoing gender.Gender & Society. 2007;21 (1): 106-27.
21. Devitt J.Framing gender on the campaign trail: Women's executive leadership and the press. Washington, DC: Women's Leadership Fund; 1999:.
22. Dolan K. A.Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2004:.
23. Eagly A. H.,Karau Steven J.Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological Review. 2002;109 (3): 573-98.
24. Ervin-Tripp S.Directions in sociolinguistics. Gumperz J. J.Hymes D., ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1972:213-50.
25. FalkErika. November 2008a. Gender bias? The press coverage of Senator Hillary Clinton's announcement to seek the White House. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 94th Annual Convention, San Diego. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p243735_index.html.
26. Falk ErikaWomen for president: Media bias in eight campaigns. Chicago: University of Illinois Press; 2008b:.
27. Falk Erika,Kenski Kate.Issue saliency and gender stereotypes: Support for women as presidents in times of war and terrorism.Social Science Quarterly. 2006;87 (1): 1-18.
28. Faludi SusanBacklash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Anchor; 1992:.
29. Flowers Julianne F.,Haynes Audrey A.,Crespin Michael H.The media, the campaign, and the message.American Journal of Political Science. 2003;47 (2): 259-73.
30. Foschi MarthaSociological theories in progress: New formulations. Berger J.Zelditch M.Anderson B., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989:58-72.
31. Foschi Martha,Lai Larissa,Sigerson Kirsten.Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1994;57 (4): 326-39.
32. Foucault MichelThe order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge; 1989:.
33. Foucault MichelThe archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge; 2002:.
34. Fowler C. A.Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts.Language and Speech. 1988;31:307-19.
35. Fox Richard,Oxley Zoe.Gender stereotyping in state executive elections: Candidate selection and success.Journal of Politics. 2003;65 (3): 833-50.
36. Freeman JoWe will be heard: Women's struggles for political power in the United States. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2008:.
37. Freud S.The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library; 1938:.
38. Gardetto Darlaine C.Hillary Rodham Clinton, symbolic gender politics, and The New York Times: January-November 1992.Political Communication. 1997;14 (2): 225-40.
39. Groeling Tim.Who's the fairest of them all? An empirical test for partisan bias on ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox news.Presidential Studies Quarterly. 2008;38 (4): 631-57.
40. Gutold Nichola D.Paving the way for madam president. Oxford, UK: Lexington Books; 2006:.
41. Hagan John.The gender stratification of income inequality among lawyers.Social Forces. 1990;68 (3): 835-55.
42. Hamilton James T.The press. Overholser G.Jamieson K. H., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005:351-70.
43. Rethinking madam president. Han Lori CoxHeldman Caroline, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2007:.
44. Hartman A. A.Name styles in relation to personality.Journal of General Psychology. 1958;59:289-94.
45. Heith D. J.Anticipating madam president. Watson R. P.Gordon A., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2003:123-30.
46. Heldman CarolineRethinking madam president boulder. Han Lori CoxHeldman Caroline, ed. CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2007:.
47. Heldman Caroline,Carroll S. J.,Olson S.She brought only a skirt: Print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole's bid for the Republican presidential nomination.Political Communication. 2005;22:315-35.
48. Howard Judith A.,Hollander JocelynGendered situations, gendered selves. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
49. Huber Joan.Trends in gender stratification, 1970-1985.Sociological Forum. 1986;1 (3): 476-95.
50. Huddy Leonie,Terkildsen Nayda.The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office.Political Research Quarterly. 1993a;46:503-25.
51. Huddy Leonie,Terkildsen Nayda.Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.American Journal of Political Science. 1993b;37 (1): 119-47.
52. John Kenneth E.A report: 1980-1988 New Hampshire presidential primary polls.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1989;53 (4): 590-605.
53. Kahn K. F.Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of U.S. senate candidates.Journal of Politics. 1992;54 (2): 497-517.
54. Kahn K. F.The distorted mirror: Press coverage of women candidates for statewide office.Journal of Politics. 1994a;56 (1): 154-73.
55. Kahn K. F.Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns.American Journal of Political Science. 1994b;38 (1): 162-95.
56. Kahn K. F.The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press; 1996:.
57. Kahn K. F.,Goldenberg E. N.Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in U.S. senate campaign coverage.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1991;55:180-99.
58. Kissling E. A.When being female isn't feminine: Uta Pippig and the menstrual communication taboo in sports journalism.Sociology of Sport Journal. 1999;16 (1): 79-91.
59. Kittilson Miki Caul,Fridkin Kim.Gender, candidate portrayals and election campaigns: A comparative perspective.Politics & Gender. 2008;4:371-92.
60. Lawless Jennifer.Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era.Political Research Quarterly. 2004;57 (3): 479-89.
61. Little Craig,Gelles Richard.The social-psychological implications of form of address.Sociometry. 1975;38 (4): 573-86.
62. Lorber J.Breaking the bowls: Degendering and feminist change. New York: Norton; 2005:.
63. MacCorquodale Patricia,Jensen Gary.Women in the law: Partners or tokens?.Gender & Society. 1993;7 (4): 582-93.
64. McConnell-Ginet S.Women's language and style. Butturff D.Epstien E. L., ed. Akron Press, OH: University of Akron Press; 1978:23-35.
65. Defining women: Social institutions and gender divisions. McDowell L.Pringle R., ed. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press; 1992:.
66. McKay Steven C.Hard drives and glass ceilings: Gender stratification in high-tech production.Gender & Society. 2006;20 (2): 207-35.
67. Miller Melissa K.,Peake Jeffrey S.,Boulton Brittany Anne.Testing the Saturday Night Live hypothesis: Fairness and bias in newspaper coverage of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.Politics & Gender. 2010;6:169-98.
68. Murphy W. F.A note on the significance of names.Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 1957;26:91-106.
69. Paludi Michele,Strayer Lisa.What's in a name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name.Sex Roles. 1985;12:353-61.
70. Rendle-Short Johanna.Catherine, you're wasting your time: Address terms within the Australian political interview.Journal of Pragmatics. 2007;39 (9): 1503-25.
71. Ridgeway C. L.Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social interactions.Gender & Society. 2009;23 (2): 145-60.
72. Ridout Christine F.News coverage and talk shows in the 1992 presidential campaign.PS: Political Science and Politics. 1993;26 (4): 712-16.
73. Rothbart M.,Evans M.,Fulero S.Confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1979;15:343-59.
74. Rubin Rebecca.Ideal traits and terms of address for male and female college professors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981;41 (5): 966-74.
75. Rudman L. A.,Kilianski S. E.Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26:1315-28.
76. Sanbonmatsu K.Gender stereotypes and vote choice.American Journal of Political Science. 2002;46:20-34.
77. Sanbonmatsu K.Political knowledge and gender stereotypes.American Politics Research. 2003;31 (6): 575-94.
78. Sebastian Richard J.,Bristow Dennis.Formal or informal? The impact of style of dress and forms of address on business student's perceptions of professors.Journal of Education for Business. 2008;83 (4): 196-201.
79. Slobin D. I.,Miller S. H.,Porter L. W.Forms of address and social relations in a business organization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968;8:289-93.
80. Smith Jessi,Paul David,Paul Rachael.No place for a woman: Evidence for gender bias in evaluations of presidential candidates.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2007;29 (3): 225-33.
81. Spender D.Language and power. Kramerae C.Schultz M.O'Barr W. M., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1984:194-205.
82. Stewart Tracie L.,Berkvens Mathilde,Engles Werny,Pass Jessica.Status and likability: Can the "mindful" woman have it all?.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2003;33 (10): 2040-59.
83. Stivers CamillaGender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. 2002. Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
84. Takiff Hilary A.,Sanchez Diana T.,Stewart Tracie L.What's in a name? The status implications of students' terms of address for male and female professors.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2001;25:134-44.
85. Anticipating madame president. Watson R. P.Gordon A., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2003:.
86. Winfield Betty Houchin.The making of an image: Hillary Rodham Clinton and American journalists.Political Communication. 1997;14 (2): 241-53.
87. Wood J. T.Telling our stories: Narratives as a basis for theorizing sexual harassment.Journal of Applied Communication Research. 1992;20:349-62.