Folk Psychology, Consciousness, and Context Effects

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 371-393

  Arico, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955202213     PISSN: 18785158     EISSN: 18785166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-010-0029-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arico, A., B. Fiala, R. Goldberg, and S. Nichols. Submitted. The Folk Psychology of Consciousness.
2. Augustine. 1995. Against the Academicians; The Teacher. King, P. (trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
3. Bloom, P., and C. Veres. 1999. The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition 71: B1-B9.
4. DeRose, K. 1999. Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense. in Greco, J. and Sosa, E. ed., The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Blackwell Publishers, pp. 187-205.
5. Gallagher, S. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon.
6. Goldman, A. 1989. Interpretation Psychologized. Mind and Language, 4 pp. 161-185; reprinted in Davies, M. and Stone T. (eds.). 1995. Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Gopnik, A., and A. Meltzoff. 1997. Words, Thoughts and Theories. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
8. Gordon, R. 1986. Folk Psychology as Simulation. Mind and Language, 1 pp. 158-171; reprinted in Davies, M. and Stone T. (eds.). 1995. Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Gray, H., K. Gray, and D. Wegner. 2007. Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science 315(5812): 619.
10. Heal, J. 1986. Replication and Functionalism. in Language, Mind, and Logic. Butterfield, J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Davies, M. and Stone T. (eds.). 1995. Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Heider, F., and M. Simmel. 1944. An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. American Journal of Psychology. 57: 243-259.
12. Huebner, B. 2010. Commonsense Concepts of Phenomenal Consciousness: Does Anyone Care About Functional Zombies? Phenomenology and the Cognitice Sciences 9(1): 133-155.
13. Huebner, B., M. Bruno, and H. Sarkissian. 2009. What Does the Nation of China Think About Phenomenal States? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3).
14. Johnson, S. 2003. Detecting Agents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358(1431): 549-559.
15. Johnson, S., Y. Shimizu, and S.-J. Ok. 2007. Actors and actions: The Role of Agent Behavior in Infants' Attribution of Goals. Cognitive Development 22(3): 310-322.
16. Knobe, J., and J. Prinz. 2008. Intuitions about Consciousness: Experimental Studies. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7(1): 67-83.
17. Mill, J. S. 1865. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, and of the Principal Philosophical Questions Discussed in His Writings. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green.
18. Reid, T. 1785. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: Printed for John Bell and G. G. J. and J. Robinson.
19. Robbins, P., and A. Jack. 2006. The Phenomenal Stance. Philosophical Studies 127: 59-85.
20. Sellars, W. 1956. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 1, ed. H. Feigl and M. Scriven. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press.
21. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. Framing Moral Intuitions. in Moral Psychology, Volume 2. In The Cognitive Science of Morality, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong, 47-76. Cambridge: MIT Pres.
22. Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. New York: OUP.
23. Sytsma, J., and E. Machery. 2009. How to Study Folk Intuitions about Phenomenal Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 22(1): 21-35.
24. Woodward, A. L. 1998. Infants Selectively Encode the Goal object of an Actor's Reach. Cognition 69: 1-34.
25. Zahavi, D. 2005. Subjectivity and Self-hood: Investigating the First-person Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.