Importance of metabolic coupling for the dynamics of gene expression following a diauxic shift in Escherichia coli

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 295, Issue , 2012, Pages 100-115

  Baldazzi, Valentina ^a   Ropers, Delphine ^b   Geiselmann, Johannes ^b,c   Kahn, Daniel ^d   de Jong, Hidde ^b  

^a Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^b INRIA RHÔNE ALPES   (France)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Hybrid models; Microbiology; Modeling and identification; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; GLUCOSE;

COLIFORM BACTERIUM; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ENZYME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HYBRID; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; CARBON FIXATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC LINKAGE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

CARBON; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GLUCONEOGENESIS; GLUCOSE; GLYCOLYSIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, GENETIC;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 82955189261     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baldazzi V., Ropers D., Markowicz Y., Kahn D., Geiselmann J., de Jong H. The carbon assimilation network in Escherichia coli is densely connected and largely sign-determined by directions of metabolic fluxes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000812.
2. Batt G., de Jong H., Page M., Geiselmann J. Symbolic reachability analysis of genetic regulatory networks using discrete abstractions. Automatica 2008, 44:982-989.
3. Bettenbrock K., Fischer S., Kremling A., Jahreis K., Sauter T., Gilles E. A quantitative approach to catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 281:2578-2584.
4. Bolouri H. Computational Modeling of Gene Regulatory Networks-A Primer 2008, Imperial College Press, London.
5. Brazhnik P., de la Fuente A., Mendes P. Gene networks: how to put the function in genomics. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20:467-472.
6. Cara B., Giovannoni J. Molecular biology of ethylene during tomato fruit development and maturation. Plant Sci. 2008, 175:106-113.
7. Chassagnole C., Noisommit-Rizzi N., Schmid J., Mauch K., Reuss M. Dynamic modeling of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79:53-73.
8. Chaves M., Sontag E., Albert R. Methods for the robustness analysis for Boolean models. IET Syst. Biol. 2006, 153:154-167.
9. Covert M., Knight E., Reed J., Herrgard M., Palsson B. Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks. Nature 2004, 429:92-100.
10. Covert M., Xiao N., Chen T., Karr J. Integrating metabolic, transcriptional regulatory and signal transduction models in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2044-2050.
11. Davidich M., Bornholdt S. The transition from differential equations to Boolean networks: a case study in simplifying a regulatory network model. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 255:269-277.
12. de Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J. Comput. Biol. 2002, 9:67-103.
13. de Jong H., Ropers D. Strategies for dealing with incomplete information in the modeling of molecular interaction networks. Brief. Bioinform. 2006, 7:354-363.
14. de Jong H., Geiselmann J., Hernandez C., Page M. Genetic Network Analyzer: qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:336-344.
15. de Jong H., Gouzé J.-L., Hernandez C., Page M., Sari T., Geiselmann J. Qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks using piecewise-linear models. Bull. Math. Biol. 2004, 66:301-340.
16. de Jong H., Geiselmann J., Batt G., Hernandez C., Page M. Qualitative simulation of the initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis. Bull. Math. Biol. 2004, 66:261-299.
17. Fauré A., Thieffry D. Logical modelling of cell cycle control in eukaryotes: a comparative study. Mol. Biosyst. 2009, 5:1569-1581.
18. Glass L., Kauffman S. The logical analysis of continuous non-linear biochemical control networks. J. Theor. Biol. 1973, 39:103-129.
19. Gutierrez-Ríos R., Freyre-Gonzalez J., Resendis O., Collado-Vides J., Saier M., Gosset G. Identification of regulatory network topological units coordinating the genome-wide transcriptional response to glucose in Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7:53.
20. Hardiman T., Lemuth K., Reuss M.K.M., Siemann-Herzberg M. Topology of the global regulatory network of carbon limitation in Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 132:359-374.
21. Hecker M., Lambeck S., Toepfer S., vanSomeren E., Guthke R. Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models-a review. Biosystems 2009, 96:86-103.
22. Heinrich R., Schuster S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems 1996, Chapman & Hall, New York.
23. Ironi L., Panzeri L. A computational framework for qualitative simulation of nonlinear dynamical models of gene-regulatory networks. BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10:S14.
24. Ishizuka H., Hanamura A., Kunimura T., Aiba H. A lowered concentration of cAMP receptor protein caused by glucose is an important determinant for catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 10:341350.
25. Kao K.C., Tran L.M., Liao J.C. A global regulatory role of gluconeogenic genes in Escherichia coli revealed by transcriptome network analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:36079-36087.
26. Kappler K., Edwards R., Glass L. Dynamics in high-dimensional model gene networks. Signal Process. 2003, 83:789-798.
27. Karlebach G., Shamir R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:770-780.
28. Keseler I.M., Collado-Vides J., Santos-Zavaleta A., Peralta-Gil M., Gama-Castro S., Muñiz-Rascado L., Bonavides-Martinez C., Paley S., Krummenacker M., Altman T., Kaipa P., Spaulding A., Pacheco J., Latendresse M., Fulcher C., Sarker M., Shearer A.G., Mackie A., Paulsen I., Gunsalus R.P., Karp P.D. EcoCyc: a comprehensive database of Escherichia coli biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D583-D590.
29. Khalil H. Nonlinear Systems 2001, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 3rd ed.
30. Klipp E., Nordlander B., Krüger R., Gennemark P., Hohmann S. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:975-982.
31. Kotte O., Zaugg J., Heinemann M. Bacterial adaptation through distributed sensing of metabolic fluxes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:355.
32. Kremling A. Comment on mathematical models which describe transcription and calculate the relationship between mRNA and protein expression ratio. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 96:815-819.
33. Leigh J.A., Dodsworth J.A. Nitrogen regulation in bacteria and archaea. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61:349-377.
34. Li S., Assmann S., Albert R. Predicting essential components of signal transduction networks: a dynamic model of guard cell abscisic acid signaling. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e312.
35. Liu M., Durfee T., Cabrera J., Zhao K., Jin D., Blattner F. Global transcriptional programs reveal a carbon source foraging strategy by Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:15921-15927.
36. Mandel M., Silhavy T. Starvation for different nutrients in Escherichia coli results in differential modulation of RpoS levels and stability. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187:434-442.
37. Monteiro P., Ropers D., Mateescu R., Freitas A., de Jong H. Temporal logic patterns for querying dynamic models of cellular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:i227-i233.
38. Morris M., Saez-Rodriguez J., Sorger P., Lauffenburger D. Logic-based models for the analysis of cell signaling networks. Biochemistry 2010, 49:3216-3225.
39. Naldi A., Carneiro J., Chaouiya C., Thieffry D. Diversity and plasticity of Th cell types predicted from regulatory network modelling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000912.
40. Nanchen A., Schicker A., Revelles O., Sauer U. Cyclic AMP-dependent catabolite repression is the dominant control mechanism of metabolic fluxes under glucose limitation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190:2323-2330.
41. Oh M.-K., Rohlin L., Kao K.C., Liao J.C. Global expression profiling of acetate-grown Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:13175-13183.
42. Osorio S., Alba R., Damasceno C.M.B., Lopez-Casado G., Lohse M., Zanor M.I., Tohge T., Usadel B., Rose J.K.C., Fei Z., Giovannoni J.J., Fernie A.R. Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:405-425.
43. Oyarzún, D., Chaves, M., 2011. Global gene regulation in metabolic networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress. Milano, Italy. pp. 14838-14843.
44. Peng L., Shimizu K. Global metabolic regulation analysis for Escherichia coli K12 based on protein expression by 2-dimensional electrophoresis and enzyme activity measurement. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 61:163-178.
45. Plahte E., Mestl T., Omholt S. A methodological basis for description and analysis of systems with complex switch-like interactions. J. Math. Biol. 1998, 36:321-348.
46. Polynikis A., Hogan S., di Bernardo M. Comparing different ODE modelling approaches for gene regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 261:511-530.
47. Radulescu O., Lagarrigue S., Siegel A., Veber P., Borgne M.L. Topology and static response of interaction networks in molecular biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 2006, 3:185-196.
48. Reder C. Metabolic control theory: a structural approach. J. Theor. Biol. 1988, 135:175-201.
49. Ropers D., de Jong H., Page M., Schneider D., Geiselmann J. Qualitative simulation of the carbon starvation response in Escherichia coli. Biosystems 2006, 84:124-152.
50. Ropers D., Baldazzi V., de Jong H. Model reduction using piecewise-linear approximations preserves dynamic properties of the carbon starvation response in Escherichia coli. ACM/IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2011, 8:166-181.
51. Saez-Rodriguez J., Alexopoulos L., Epperlein J., Samaga R., Lauffenburger D., Klamt S., Sorger P. Discrete logic modelling as a means to link protein signalling networks with functional analysis of mammalian signal transduction. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:331.
52. Saier M.H., Ramseier T.M., Reizer J. Regulation of carbon utilization. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology 1996, 1325-1343. ASM Press, Washington, DC. F. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss, J. Ingraham, E. Lin, K. Low, B. Magasanik, W. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, H. Umbarger (Eds.).
53. Santner A., Estelle M. Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 2009, 459:1071-1078.
54. Sarkar D., Siddiquee K., Araúzo-Bravo M., Oba T., Shimizu K. Effect of cra gene knockout together with edd and iclR genes knockout on the metabolism in Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 2008, 190:558-571.
55. Sepulchre J.-A., Reverchon S., Nasser W. Modeling the onset of virulence in a pectinolytic bacterium. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 44:239-257.
56. Shlomi T., Eisenberg Y., Sharan R., Ruppin E. A genome-scale computational study of the interplay between transcriptional regulation and metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:101.
57. Silva-Rocha R., Tamames J., Santos V.D., de Lorenzo V. The logicome of environmental bacteria: merging catabolic and regulatory events with Boolean formalisms. Environ. Microbiol 2011, 13:2389-2402.
58. Snoussi E. Qualitative dynamics of piecewise-linear differential equations: a discrete mapping approach. Dyn. Stab. Syst. 1989, 4:189-207.
59. Thouvenot B., Charpentier B., Branlant C. The strong efficiency of the Escherichia coli gapA P1 promoter depends on a complex combination of functional determinants. Biochem. J. 2004, 383:371-382.
60. Usseglio Viretta A., Fussenegger M. Modeling the quorum sensing regulatory network of human-pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20:670-678.
61. Venturi V. Control of rpoS transcription in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas: why so different?. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 49:1-9.
62. Wittmann D., Krumsiek J., Saez-Rodriguez J., Lauffenburger D., Klamt S., Theis F. Transforming Boolean models to continuous models: methodology and application to T-cell receptor signaling. BMC Syst. Biol. 2009, 3:98.
63. s level in starving Escherichia coli cells increases solely as a result of its increased stability despite decreased synthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 24:643-652.