Comparison of linear and angular measurements using twodimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 492-500

  Oz, U ^a   Orhan, K ^b   Abe, N ^c  

^a NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Abe Dental and Orthodontic Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Cone Beam computed tomography generated cephalograms; Measurement; Orthodontics; Volumetric rendering

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 82755170427     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15644321     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1931; 1: 45-60.
2. Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, SökücüO. A comparison of twodimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 100-106.
3. Papadopoulos MA, Jannowitz C, Boettcher P, Henke J, Stolla R, Zeilhofer HF, et al. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005; 33: 229-237. (Pubitemid 40903746)
4. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 430-436.
5. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F,Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 262-273.
6. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 873-879.
7. Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, ToygarMemikoglu TU. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 241-246.
8. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 111-127.
9. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 505-517.
10. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 263-269. (Pubitemid 47218404)
11. Sandler PJ. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements. Br J Orthod 1988; 15: 105-110.
12. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3D cephalometry part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17: 314-325. (Pubitemid 44317893)
13. Swennen GRJ, Barth EL, Schutyser F, De Groeve P, Lemaitre A. Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometry, the basics for virtual planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32: 135.
14. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: Spiral multi-slice vs cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 410-416. (Pubitemid 44376705)
15. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 111-116. (Pubitemid 27119981)
16. Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83: 41-48. (Pubitemid 127671832)
17. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 803-811. (Pubitemid 41797623)
18. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 257-265. (Pubitemid 44202655)
19. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80. (Pubitemid 43326970)
20. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived three-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 387-395.
21. Van Vlijmen OJC, Berge SJ, Swennen GRJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 92-97.
22. Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39: 156-160.
23. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 312-313.
24. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 150-157.
25. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Bergamo IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564. (Pubitemid 128662693)
26. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291-294. (Pubitemid 40288455)
27. Connor SE, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, O'Gorman R. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 270-276. (Pubitemid 47218405)
28. Korbmacher H, Kahl-Nieke B, Schöllchen M, Heiland M. Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 278-289. (Pubitemid 47103876)
29. Lou L, Lagravere M, Compton S, Major P, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 402-411.
30. Lagravère MO, Gordon JM, Guedes IH, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Heo G, et al. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 1047-1056.
31. Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 36-42.
32. Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 315-321. (Pubitemid 41219093)
33. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of threedimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 129-134.
34. Chidiac JJ, Shofer FS, Al-Kutoub A, Laster LL, Ghafari J. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5: 104-113.
35. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 170-176.
36. Greiner M, Greiner A, Hirschfelder U. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 290-298. (Pubitemid 47103877)
37. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR. Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 460-470.
38. Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 611-618. (Pubitemid 43648271)
39. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410-416. (Pubitemid 44904797)
40. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 550-560.
41. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 798-802.
42. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19-25.
43. Polat-Ozsoy O, Gokcelik A, ToygarMemikoglu TU. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 254-259.
44. Santoro M, Jarjoura K, Cangialosi TJ. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 345-351. (Pubitemid 43351111)
45. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG. 3D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 224-230.
46. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH, Attarzadeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks - an error study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94: 411-415.
47. Jacquet W, Nyssen E, Bottenberg P, de Groen P, Vande Vannet B. Novel information theory based method for superimposition of lateral head radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 191-198.
48. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 640.e1-640e.5.