Spoilt for choice: The role of counterfactual thinking in the excess choice and reversibility paradoxes

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-36

  Hafner, Rebecca J ^a   White, Mathew P ^a   Handley, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Counterfactual thought; Decision making; Excess choice; Reversibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655181917     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson C.J. The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129:139-167.
2. Arunachalam B., Henneberry S.R., Lusk J.L., Norwood F.B. An empirical investigation into the excessive-choice effect. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 91(3):810-825.
3. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.
4. Beck S.R., Riggs K.J., Gorniak S.L. Relating developments in children's counterfactual thinking and executive functions. Thinking and Reasoning 2009, 15:337-354.
5. Botti S., Iyengar S.S. The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. Journal of the American Marketing Association 2006, 25(1):24-38.
6. Byrne R.M.J. The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality 2005, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.
7. Chua R.Y.J., Iyengar S.S. Creativity as a matter of choice: Prior experience and task instruction as boundary conditions for the positive effect of choice on creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour 2008, 42(3):164-180.
8. De Neys W., Schaeken W. When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology 2007, 54(2):128-133.
9. Dhar R. Consumer preference for an imposed-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research 1997, 24:215-231.
10. Dijksterhuis A., Bos M.W., Nordgren L.F., van Baaren R.B. On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science 2006, 311:1005-1007.
11. Dijksterhuis A., van Olden Z. On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42:627-631.
12. Dolan P., White M.P. How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2007, 2(1):71-85.
13. Epstude K., Roese N.J. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12(2):168-192.
14. Feeney A., Handley S.J. Comparisons between decision makers and the action effect in judgments of regret. Memory and Cognition 2006, 34:1422-1430.
15. Gilbert D.T., Ebert J.E.J. Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82(4):503-514.
16. Gingras I. Dealing with too much choice (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International 2003, 64:2439.
17. Goldinger S.D., Kleider H.M., Azuma T., Beike D.R. Blaming the victim under memory load. Psychological Science 2003, 14(1):81-85.
18. Iyengar S.S., Lepper M.R. When choice is de-motivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79(6):995-1006.
19. Iyengar S.S., Wells R.E., Schwartz B. Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the 'best' job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science 2006, 17(2):143-150.
20. Johnson-Laird P.N., Byrne R.M.J. Deduction 1991, Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ.
21. Kahneman D. Varieties of counterfactual thinking. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 375-396. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
22. Kahneman D., Miller D. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 1986, 93:136-153.
23. Knowles E.S., Condon C.A. Why people say yes: A dual-process theory of acquiescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77(2):379-386.
24. Landman J. Regret: The persistence of the possible 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a new science 2005, Penguin, London, UK.
26. Markman K.D., Gavanski I., Sherman S.J., McMullen M.N. The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1993, 29(87-109).
27. Morsanyi K., Handley S.J. How smart do you need to be to get it wrong? The role of cognitive capacity in the development of heuristic-based judgment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 99:18-36.
28. Müller U., Miller M.R., Michalczyk K., Karapinka A. False belief understanding: The influence of person, grammatical mood, counterfactual reasoning and working memory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2007, 25(4):615-632.
29. Niedenthal P.M., Tangney J.P., Gavanski I. If only I weren't versus if only I hadn't: Distinguishing shame from guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67(4):585-595.
30. Propper C., Wilson D., Burgess S. Extending choice in health care: The implications of the economic evidence. CMPO working paper series no. 05/133 2005.
31. Reutskaja E., Hogarth R.M. Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When goods satiate. Psychology and Marketing 2009, 26(3):197-203.
32. Roese N.J. Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121(1):133-148.
33. Roese N.J., Olson J.M. Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 1-55. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
34. Roese N.J., Summerville A. What we regret most ... and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31(9):1273-1285.
35. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:141-166.
36. Sagi A., Friedland N. The cost of richness: The effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93(4):515-524.
37. Scheibehenne B., Greifeneder R., Todd P.M. What moderates the too-much-choice effect?. Psychology and Marketing 2009, 26(3):229-253.
38. Scheibehenne B., Greifeneder R., Todd P.M. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research 2010, 37:409-425.
39. Schwartz B. Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist 2000, 55(1):79-88.
40. Schwartz B. The paradox of choice: Why more is less 2004, HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York.
41. Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., Lehman D.R. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(5):1178-1197.
42. Shar A.M., Wolford G. Buying behaviour as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science 2007, 18(5):369-370.
43. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63:129-138.
44. Thaler R.H., Benartzi S. Save more tomorrow: Using behavioural economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy 2004, 112(1):S164-S187.
45. Tsiros M., Mittal V. Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 2000, 26:401-417.
46. Walchi S.B., Landman J. Effects of counterfactual thought on postpurchase consumer affect. Psychology and Marketing 2003, 20(1):23-46.
47. Ward A., Mann T. Don't mind if I do: Disinhibited eating under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78(4):753-763.
48. Wolfe A. Moral freedom: The search for virtue in a world of choice 2001, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.