Regional development in South Korea: Accounting for research area in centrality and networks

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 271-287

  Shapiro, Matthew A ^a   Park, Han Woo ^b  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Centrality; Density; Fragmentation; Korean NIS; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655173863     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0498-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bernard, A. B., & Durlauf, S. N. (1996). Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics, 71(1-2), 161-173. doi: 10. 1016/0304-4076(94)01699-2.
2. Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation, 25(2), 155-169.
3. Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5-15.
4. Dreher, A., & Krieger, T. (2005). Do gasoline prices converge in a unified Europe with non-harmonized tax rates? KOF Working Paper No. 114. doi: 10. 2139/ssrn. 617346.
5. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix innovation: Industry, university, and government in action. London: Routledge.
6. Evans, P., & Karras, G. (1996). Convergence revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(2), 249-265. doi: 10. 1016/s0304-3932(96)90036-7.
7. Hirshman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Have: Yale University Press.
8. Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2011, forthcoming). Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
9. Kim, M.-J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321-339.
10. Kim, I. K. (2010). Socioeconomic concentration in the Seoul metropolitan area and its implications in the urbanization process of Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 111-128. (written in Korean).
11. Kim, L., & Dahlman, C. J. (1992). Technology policy and industrialization: An integrative framework and Korea's experience. Research Policy, 21(5), 437-452.
12. Kwon, K.-S. (2009). The co-evolution of academic research and knowledge-transfer activities of universities in catch-up countries: In the case of Korea. A paper presented to the Triple Helix 2008 conference. http://www.triple-helix-7.org.
13. Kwon, K.-S. (2011). Are scientific capacities and industrial funding critical for universities' knowledge-transfer activities? A case study of South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 10(1), 15-23. http://www. eastasia.at/documents/Kwon.pdf.
14. Kwon, K.-S., Park, H. W., So, M. H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics. A special issue on Triple Helix and WSI (Webometrics Scientometrics Informetics) in Asia. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0512-9.
15. Lee, W.-Y. (2000). The role of science and technology policy in Korea's industrial development. In L. Kim & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Technology learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lee, K., Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1997). Growth and convergence in a multi-country empirical stochastic Solow model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(4), 357-392. doi: 10. 1002/(sici)1099-1255(199707)12: 4< 357:: aid-jae441> 3. 0. co; 2-t.
17. Levin, A. T., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
18. Liu, S.-G., & Chen, C. (2003). Regional innovation system: Theoretical approach and empirical study of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(3), 193-198.
19. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and The Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
20. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S& T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439-462.
21. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
22. Shapiro, M. A., So, M., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 845-857.
23. Sohn, D.-W., & Kenney, M. (2007). Universities, clusters, and innovation systems: The case of Seoul, Korea. World Development, 35(6), 991-1004.
24. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Little Brown.
25. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Yang, C. H., Park, H. W., & Heo, J. (2010). A network analysis of interdisciplinary research relationships: The Korean government's R&D grant program. Scientometrics, 83(1), 77-92.
27. Young, A. T., Higgins, M. J., & Levy, D. (2008). Sigma convergence versus beta convergence: Evidence from U. S. county-level data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(5), 1083-1093. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1538-4616. 2008. 00148. x.