The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 7693-7708

  Melbourne, A ^a   Hipwell, J ^a   Modat, M ^a   Mertzanidou, T ^a   Huisman, H ^b   Ourselin, S ^a   Hawkes, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST AGENT; DATA SETS; DCE-MRI; MISREGISTRATION; MODEL FITTING; MOTION ARTEFACTS; MOTION CORRECTION; NONRIGID IMAGE REGISTRATION; PARAMETER CHANGES; PATIENT MOTIONS; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; TIME SPENT; TWO SECTION;

ALGORITHMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHARMACOKINETICS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREAST; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOVEMENT;

EID: 82555193351     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/24/001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adluru G, DiBella E V R and Schabel M C 2006 Model-based registration for dynamic cardiac perfusion MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24 1062-70 (Pubitemid 44658244)
2. Ahearn T S, Staff R T, Redpath T W and Semple S I K 2004 The effects of renal variation upon measurements of perfusion and leakage volume in breast tumours Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2041-51 (Pubitemid 38735490)
3. Balvay D, Frouin F, Calmon G, Bessoud B, Kahn E, Siauve N, Clément O and Cuenod C A 2005 New criteria for assessing fit quality in dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI for perfusion and permeability imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 54 868-77 (Pubitemid 41457058)
4. Buckley D L 2002 Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 47 601-6 (Pubitemid 34194016)
5. Buonaccorsi G A et al 2007 Tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI time-series data Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1010-9 (Pubitemid 350074369)
6. Buonaccorsi G A, Roberts C, Cheung S, Watson Y, O'Connor J P B, Davies K, Jackson A, Jayson G C and Parker G J M 2006 Comparison of the performance of tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using different models of contrast enhancement Acad. Radiol. 13 1112-23 (Pubitemid 44294869)
7. Carmeliet P and Jain R K 2000 Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases Nature 407 249-57
8. Hayton P, Brady M, Tarassenko L and Moore N 1997 Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement Med. Image Anal. 1 207-24 (Pubitemid 127502899)
9. Hill A, Mehnert A, Crozier S, Leung C, Wilson S, McMahon K and Kennedy D 2006 Dynamic breast MRI: image registration and its impact on enhancement curve estimation Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1 3049-52 (Pubitemid 46520552)
10. Kershaw L E and Buckley D L 2006 Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 56 986-92 (Pubitemid 44691340)
11. Koh T S, Cheong L H, Hou Z and Soh Y C 2003 A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 159-67 (Pubitemid 36330914)
12. Kuhl C, Schrading S, Bieling H B, Wardelmann E, Leutner C C, Koenig R, Kuhn W and Schild H H 2007 MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet 370 485-92 (Pubitemid 47214635)
13. Kuhl C et al 2010 Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial J. Clin. Oncol. 28 1450-7
14. Leach M O et al (Pharmacodynamic/Pharmacokinetic Technologies Advisory Committee (PTAC)) 2005 The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations Br. J. Cancer. 92 1599-610 (Pubitemid 40756468)
15. Martel A L, Froh M S, Brock K K, Plewes D B and Barber D C 2007 Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3803-16 (Pubitemid 46908596)
16. Melbourne A, Atkinson D, White M J, Collins D, Leach M and Hawkes D 2007 Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR) Phys. Med. Biol. 52 5147-56 (Pubitemid 350153380)
17. Milles J, van der Geest R J, Jerosch-Herold M, Reiber J H C and Lelieveldt B P F 2008 Fully automated motion correction in first-pass myocardial perfusion MR image sequences IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27 1611-21
18. Modat M, Ridgway G R, Taylor Z A, Lehmann M, Barnes J, Fox N C, Hawkes D J and Ourselin S 2010 Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 98 278-84
19. Ou Y, Sotiras A, Paragios N and Davatzikos C 2011 DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting Med. Image Anal. 15 622-39
20. Padhani A R, Hayes C, Landau S and Leach M O 2002 Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues NMR Biomed. 15 143-53 (Pubitemid 34213404)
21. Padhani A R and Husband J E 2001 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in oncology with an emphasis on quantification, validation and human studies Clin. Radiol. 56 607-20 (Pubitemid 35023779)
22. Posada D and Buckley T R 2004 Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests Syst. Biol. 53 793-808 (Pubitemid 39568279)
23. Rohlfing T, Maurer C R, Bluemke D A and Jacobs M A 2003 Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22 730-41
24. Rueckert D, Sonoda L I, Hayes C, Hill D L, Leach M O and Hawkes D J 1999 Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 712-21 (Pubitemid 32262025)
25. Sourbron S P and Buckley D L 2011 On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 66 735-45
26. Studholme C, Hill D and Hawkes D 1999 An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment Pattern Recognit. 32 71-86
27. Tanner C, Schnabel J A, Chung D, Clarkson M J, Rueckert D, Hill D L G and Hawkes D J 2000 Volume and shape preservation of enhancing lesions when applying non-rigid registration to a time series of contrast enhancing MR breast images Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2000 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 1935) (Berlin: Springer Verlag) pp 327-37
28. Tofts P S 1997 Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 91-101 (Pubitemid 28365643)
29. Tofts P S et al 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 223-32 (Pubitemid 29463104)
30. Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, Huisman H J, Barentsz J O, Blickman J G and Boetes C 2008 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions Eur. Radiol. 18 1123-33
31. Xiaohua C, Brady M, Lo J L C and Moore N 2005 Simultaneous segmentation and registration of contrast-enhanced breast MRI Information Processing in Medical Imaging (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 3565) (Berlin: Springer) pp 31-59
32. Zheng Y, Yu J, Kambhamettu C, Englander S, Schnall M D and Shen D 2007 De enhancing the dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI for robust registration Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2007 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 4791) (London: Springer) pp 933-941
33. Zollner F G, Sance R, Rogelj P, Ledesma-Carbayo M J, Rørvik J, Santos A and Lundervold A 2009 Assessment of 3D DCE-MRI of the kidneys using non-rigid image registration and segmentation of voxel time courses Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 33 171-81
34. Zuo C S, Jiang A, Buff B L, Mahon T G and Wong T Z 1996 Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging Radiology 198 903-6 (Pubitemid 26066318)