The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 849-877

  Johnson, Philip ^a   Tymms, Peter ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chemistry; learning progression; Rasch modeling; substance

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CURRICULUM DESIGNS; ENGLAND; LEARNING PROGRESSION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE SCHOOL; RASCH MODELING; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; SMALL SCALE; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; SUBSTANCE; USE OF VIDEO;

ANIMATION; CHEMISTRY; CURRICULA; STUDENTS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

EID: 82555191093     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20433     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Alonzo, A., &, Steedle, J., (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93, 389-421.
2. Andersson, B., (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
3. Ault, C., Jr., Novak, J. D., &, Gowin, D., (1984). Constructing Vee maps for clinical interviews on molecules concepts. Science Education, 68, 441-442.
4. Ausubel, D., Novak, J., &, Hanesian, H., (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. Bar, V., &, Galili, I., (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education 16 (2), 157-174.
6. Bar, V., &, Travis, A., (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (4), 363-382.
7. Barker, V., (2002). Beyond misconceptions: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
8. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., &, Silberstein, J., (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63 (1), 64-66.
9. Biggs, J., &, Collis, K., (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The solo taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
10. Bond, T., &, Fox, C., (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Briggs, D., Alonzo, A., Schwab, C., &, Wilson, M., (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33-63.
12. Briggs, H., &, Holding, B., (1986). Aspects of secondary students' understanding of elementary ideas in chemistry. Leeds: UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
13. Caldin, E., (2002). The structure of chemistry: In relation to the philosophy of science. International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 8, 103-121.
14. Claesgens, J., Scalise, K., Wilson, M., &, Stacy, A., (2009). Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives of chemists. Science Education, 93, 56-85.
15. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), (1999). The National Curriculum for England. HMSO (available at).
16. De Vos, W., &, Verdonk, A. H., (1985). A new road to reactions: Part 1. Journal of Chemical Education, 62 (3), 238-240.
17. De Vos, W., &, Verdonk, A. H., (1987). A new road to reactions Part 4: The substance and its molecules. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 692-694.
18. Driver, R., (1985). Beyond appearances: The conservation of matter under physical and chemical transformations. In, R. Driver, E. Guesne, &, A. Tiberghien, (Eds.), Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. pp. 145-169.
19. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., &, Scott, P., (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12.
20. Driver, R., Guesne, E., &, Tiberghien, A., (Eds.). (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
21. Duit, R., (2009). Bibliography-STCSE Students' & teachers' conceptions and science education. Retrieved July 2009 from.
22. Duncan, R., &, Hmelo-Silver, C., (2009). Editorial: Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 606-609.
23. Duncan, R., Rogat, A., &, Yarden, A., (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 655-674.
24. Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., &, Shouse, A., (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades k-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Elder, C., McNamara, T., &, Congdon, P., (2004). Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: An example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English. In, E. Smith, &, R. Smith, (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
26. Gabel, D., &, Bunce, D., (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In, D. Gabel, (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301-326). New York: Macmillan.
27. Garnett, P., Garnett, P., &, Hackling, M., (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in Chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
28. Gopal, H., Kleismidt, J., Case, J., &, Musonge, P., (2004). An investigation of tertiary students' understanding of evaporation, condensation and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (13), 1597-1620. (Pubitemid 40008531)
29. Griffiths, A., &, Preston, K., (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
30. He, Q., &, Tymms, P., (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429. (Pubitemid 41806815)
31. Hesse, J. J., &, Anderson, C. W., (1992). Students' conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (3), 277-299.
32. Johnson, P. M., (1995). The development of children's concept of a substance. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Durham, UK.
33. Johnson, P. M., (1996). What is a substance? Education in Chemistry, 33, 41-42. (A4).
34. Johnson, P. M., (1998a). Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (4), 393-412.
35. Johnson, P. M., (1998b). Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state. Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 567-583.
36. Johnson, P. M., (1998c). Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state. Part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (6), 695-709.
37. Johnson, P. M., (2000). Children's understanding of substances, Part 1: Recognising chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 719-737.
38. Johnson, P. M., (2002). Children's understanding of substances, Part 2: Explaining chemical change. International Journal of Science Education 24 (10), 1037-1054.
39. Johnson, P. M., (2005). The development of children's concept of a substance: A longitudinal study of interaction between curriculum and learning. Research in Science Education, 35 (1), 41-61.
40. Johnson, P. M., (2006). Sequences of teaching and learning matter in science curriculum standards: International perspectives: Developing the concept of a substance. Symposium paper, American Education Research Association Annual Conference (AERA), San Francisco.
41. Johnson, P., &, Papageorgiou, G., (2010). Rethinking the introduction of particle theory: A substance-based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (2), 130-150.
42. Johnson, P., &, Roberts, S., (2006). Stuff and Substance (a multimedia CD ROM), Gatsby Technical Education Products ().
43. Johnstone, A., (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83.
44. Johnstone, K., &, Driver, R., (1991). A case study of teaching and learning about particle theory. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
45. Kennedy, C., Brown, N., Draney, K., &, Wilson, M., (2005) Using progress variables and embedded assessment to improve teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
46. Krnel, D., Watson, R., &, Glazar, S., (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of 'matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (3), 257-289. (Pubitemid 128691661)
47. Lake, D., (2005). About being pure and natural: Understandings of pre-service primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (4), 487-506.
48. Lehrer, R., &, Schauble, L., (2009). Invited comment: Images of learning, images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 731-735.
49. Lee, L., Eichinger, O., Anderson, D., Berkheimer, C., &, Blakeslee, T., (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
50. Linacre, J., (2004). Estimation methods for Rasch measures. In, E. Smith, &, R. Smith, (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 25-47). Maple Grove: Minnesota: JAM Press.
51. Linacre, J., (2005). Winsteps Rasch Measurement, Version 3.59.1.
52. Liu, X., (2001). Synthesizing research on conceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (1), 55-81.
53. Liu, X., (2007). Elementary to high school students' growth over an academic year in understanding the concept of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 84 (11), 1853-1856. (Pubitemid 350041830)
54. Liu, X., &, Lesniak, K., (2005). Students' progression of understanding the matter concept from elementary to high school. Science Education, 89, 433-450. (Pubitemid 41360028)
55. Martin, M., &, Kelly, D., (Eds.). (1996). Third international mathematics and science study: Technical report: Vol. I. Boston College, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
56. Martin, M., &, Kelly, D., (Eds.). (1997). Third international mathematics and science study: Technical report: Vol. II. Boston College, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
57. Martin, O., Mullis, I., Gonzales, E, &, Chrostowski, S., (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Boston College, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre.
58. Mas, C., Perez, J., &, Harris, H., (1987). Parallels between adolescents' conceptions of gases and the history of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64 (7), 616-618.
59. Meheut, M., &, Chomat, A., (1990). The bounds of children's atomism: An attempt to make children build up a particulate model of matter. In, P. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. de Vos, &, A. Waarlo, (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles: A central problem in secondary science education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
60. Meheut, M., Saltiel, E., &, Tiberghien, A., (1985). Pupils' (11-12 year olds) conceptions of combustion. European Journal of Science Education, 7 (1), 587-596.
61. MidYIS. (2011). Website accessed 25/3/2011.
62. National Assessment Governing Board. (2007). Science assessment and item specification for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Prepublicatuion Edition). Retrieved July 2009 from.
63. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
64. Novak, J., &, Gowin, D., (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
65. Nussbaum, J., (1985). The particulate nature of matter in the gas phase. In, R. Driver, E. Guesne, &, A. Tiberghien, (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 124-144). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
66. Osborne, R., &, Cosgrove, M., (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20 (9), 825-838.
67. Paik, S., Kim, H., Cho, B., &, Park, J., (2004). K-8th grade Korean students' conceptions of 'changes of state' and 'conditions for changes of state'. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (2), 207-224. (Pubitemid 38237494)
68. Phillips, D., (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24 (7), 5-12.
69. Plumer, J., &, Krajcik, J., (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an Earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (7), 768-787.
70. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2000). Schemes of work: Science at key stage 3 ().
71. Russell, T., Longden, K., &, McGuigan, L., (1991). Materials. Liverpool Kings SPACE Project. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
72. Rodriguez, M., (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24 (2), 3-12.
73. Ryan, C., (1990). Student teachers' concepts of purity and of states of matter. Research in Science & Technological Education, 8 (2), 171-183.
74. Sadler, P. M., (2000). The relevance of multiple choice tests in assessing science understanding. In, J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, &, J. Novak, (Eds.), Assessing science understanding (pp. 249-278.). San Diego: CA: Academic Press.
75. Sere, M., (1985). The gaseous state. In, R. Driver, E. Guesne, &, A. Tiberghien, (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 103-123). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
76. Shayer, M., (2008). Intelligence for education: As described by Piaget and measured by psychometrics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 1-29.
77. Shayer, M., &, Adey, P., (1981). Towards a science of science teaching. London: Heineman.
78. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., &, Davis, H., (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students' preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching students about matter and density. Cognition & Instruction, 15 (3), 317-393. (Pubitemid 127341611)
79. Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C., Krajcik, J., &, Coppola, B., (2004). Implications of research on children's learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement, Center for Education, National Research Council.
80. Stains, M., &, Talanquer, V., (2007). Classification schemes used by chemistry students to identify chemical substances. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (5), 643-661: Erratum, International Journal of Science Education, 29 (7), 935-938.
81. Stavridou, H., &, Solomonidou, C., (1989). Physical phenomena-chemical phenomena: Do pupils make the distinction? International Journal of Science Education, 11 (1), 83-92.
82. Stavridou, H., &, Solomonidou, C., (1998). Conceptual reorganization and the construction of the chemical reaction concept. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (2), 205-221. (Pubitemid 128692312)
83. Stavy, R., (1988). Children's conceptions of gas. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (5), 553-560.
84. Stavy, R., (1990). Children's conceptions of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 247-266.
85. Steedle, J., &, Shavelson, R., (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnosis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 699-715.
86. Stevens, S., Delgado, C., &, Krajcik, J., (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (6), 687-715.
87. Stevens, S., Shin, N., &, Krajcik, J., (2010). Progress toward the development of an empirically tested learning progression for the nature of matter. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
88. Talanquer, V., (2006). Commonsense chemistry: A model for understanding students' alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83 (5), 811.
89. Talenquer, V., (2008). Students' predictions about the sensory properties of chemical compounds: Additive versus emergent frameworks. Science Education, 92, 96-114.
90. Tytler, R., (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students; conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (5), 447-467.
91. Westbrook, S. L., &, Marek, E. A., (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (8), 649-660.
92. Wiser, M., &, Smith, C., (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K-8: When should atomic-molecular theory be introduced? In, S. Vosniadou, (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, London: Routledge.
93. Wright, B. D., &, Mok, M., (2004). An overview of the family of Rasch measurement models. In, E. Smith, &, R. Smith, (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 25-47). Maple Grove: Minnesota: JAM Press.
94. Wright, B. D., &, Stone, M. H., (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
95. Yuan, K., Steedle, J., Shavelson, R., Alonzo, A., &, Oppezzo, M., (2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning. Educational Research Review, 1, 83-98. (Pubitemid 44542635)