Object Permanence in Five-and-a-Half-Month-Old Infants?

Infancy

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 403-428

  Bogartz, Richard S ^a   Shinskey, Jeanne L ^a   Schilling, Thomas H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000252705     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3.5- and 4.5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655-664.
2. Baillargeon, R. (1993). The object concept revisited: New directions in the investigation of infants' physical knowledge. In C. E. Granrud (Ed.), Carnegie-Mellon Symposia on Cognition: Vol. 23. Visual perception and cognition in infancy (pp. 265-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Baillargeon, R., & Graber, M. (1987). Where is the rabbit? 5.5-month-old infants' representation of the height of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 375-392.
4. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in 5-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191-208.
5. Bogartz, R. S. (1965). The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 1-14.
6. Bogartz, R. S., & Shinskey, J. L. (1998). On perception of a partially occluded object in 6-month-olds. Cognitive Development, 13, 141-163.
7. Bogartz, R. S., Shinskey, J. L., & Speaker, C. (1997). Interpreting infant looking: The Event Set x Event Set design. Developmental Psychology, 33, 408-422.
8. Cohen, L. B., & Cashon, C. (1998). Eight-month-old infants' perception of possible and impossible events. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 348.
9. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. (1991). Constraining nativist inferences about cognitive capacities. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 199-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Haith, M. M. (1988). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 167-179.
11. Hunter, M., & Ames, E. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 69-95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Hunter, M., Ross, M., & Ames, E. (1982). Preferences for familiar and novel toys: Effects of familiarization times in one-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 18, 519-529.
13. Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
14. Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Scholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing "what" and "where" systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10-18.
15. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1998). Object representation, identity, and the paradox of early permanence: Steps toward a new framework. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 201-235.
16. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 686-713.
17. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
18. Rivera, S. M., Wakeley, A., & Langer, J. (1999). The drawbridge phenomenon: Representational reasoning or perceptual preference? Developmental Psychology, 35, 427-435.
19. Rose, S., Gottfried, A. W., Melloy-Carminar, P., & Bridger, W. H. (1982). Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology, 18, 704-713.
20. Shinskey, J. L. (1999). Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
21. Simon, T. J. (1998, April). A fully operationalized, demonstrably sufficient, non-numerical account of infant "numerical competence." Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta, GA.
22. Simon, T. J., Hespos, S. J., & Rochat, P. (1995). Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253-269.
23. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.
24. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 6389, 358.
25. Wynn, K. (1998, April). Arguments against non-numerical accounts of infants' numerical competence. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta, GA.