Nuclear mechanics in differentiation and development

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 668-675

  Hampoelz, Bernhard ^a   Lecuit, Thomas ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; HISTONE; LAMIN;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CYTOSKELETON; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMERY DREIFUSS MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; EUKARYOTE; FIBROBLAST; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; LIPODYSTROPHY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; OOCYTE; OSTEOBLAST; PLASTICITY; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POLYMERIZATION; PREMATURE AGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGERIA; REVIEW; XENOPUS;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; NUCLEAR LAMINA; VISCOSITY;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 82555176487     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Joffe B., Leonhardt H., Solovei I. Differentiation and large scale spatial organization of the genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010, 20:562-569.
2. Mattout A., Meshorer E. Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010, 22:334-341.
3. Dechat T., Pfleghaar K., Sengupta K., et al. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev 2008, 22:832-853.
4. Dauer W.T., Worman H.J. The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev Cell 2009, 17:626-638.
5. Bank E.M., Ben-Harush K., Wiesel-Motiuk N., et al. A laminopathic mutation disrupting lamin filament assembly causes disease-like phenotypes in C. elegans. Mol Biol Cell 2011, 22:2716-2728.
6. Rusinol A.E., Sinensky M.S. Farnesylated lamins, progeroid syndromes and farnesyl transferase inhibitors. J Cell Sci 2006, 119:3265-3272.
7. Goldberg M.W., Fiserova J., Huttenlauch I., Stick R. A new model for nuclear lamina organization. Biochem Soc Trans 2008, 36:1339-1343.
8. Furukawa K., Ishida K., Tsunoyama T.A., et al. A-type and B-type lamins initiate layer assembly at distinct areas of the nuclear envelope in living cells. Exp Cell Res 2009, 315:1181-1189.
9. Lammerding J., Dahl K.N., Discher D.E., Kamm R.D. Nuclear mechanics and methods. Methods Cell Biol 2007, 83:269-294.
10. Lammerding J., Fong L.G., Ji J.Y., et al. Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:25768-25780.
11. Schape J., Prausse S., Radmacher M., Stick R. Influence of lamin A on the mechanical properties of amphibian oocyte nuclei measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2009, 96:4319-4325.
12. Dahl K.N., Kahn S.M., Wilson K.L., Discher D.E. The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J Cell Sci 2004, 117:4779-4786.
13. Dahl K.N., Scaffidi P., Islam M.F., et al. Distinct structural and mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:10271-10276.
14. Qin Z., Kalinowski A., Dahl K.N., Buehler M.J. Structure and stability of the lamin A tail domain and HGPS mutant. J Struct Biol 2011, 175:425-433.
15. Verstraeten V.L., Ji J.Y., Cummings K.S., et al. Increased mechanosensitivity and nuclear stiffness in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria cells: effects of farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Aging Cell 2008, 7:383-393.
16. Scaffidi P., Misteli T. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 2006, 312:1059-1063.
17. Pajerowski J.D., Dahl K.N., Zhong F.L., et al. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:15619-15624.
18. Hampoelz B., Azou-Gros Y., Fabre R., et al. Microtubule-induced nuclear envelope fluctuations control chromatin dynamics in Drosophila embryos. Development 2011, 138:3377-3386.
19. Rowat A.C., Lammerding J., Ipsen J.H. Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency. Biophys J 2006, 91:4649-4664.
20. Holaska J.M., Kowalski A.K., Wilson K.L. Emerin caps the pointed end of actin filaments: evidence for an actin cortical network at the nuclear inner membrane. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:E231.
21. Simon D.N., Zastrow M.S., Wilson K.L. Direct actin binding to A-type and B-type lamin tails and actin filament bundling by the lamin A tail. Nucleus 2010, 1:264-272.
22. Rowat A.C., Foster L.J., Nielsen M.M., et al. Characterization of the elastic properties of the nuclear envelope. J R Soc Interface 2005, 2:63-69.
23. Naetar N., Korbei B., Kozlov S., et al. Loss of nucleoplasmic LAP2alpha-lamin A complexes causes erythroid and epidermal progenitor hyperproliferation. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:1341-1348.
24. Liu J., Rolef Ben-Shahar T., Riemer D., et al. Essential roles for Caenorhabditis elegans lamin gene in nuclear organization, cell cycle progression, and spatial organization of nuclear pore complexes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:3937-3947.
25. Goldman R.D., Shumaker D.K., Erdos M.R., et al. Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:8963-8968.
26. Haithcock E., Dayani Y., Neufeld E., et al. Age-related changes of nuclear architecture in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:16690-16695.
27. Brandt A., Krohne G., Grosshans J. The farnesylated nuclear proteins Kugelkern and lamin B promote aging-like phenotypes in Drosophila flies. Aging Cell 2008, 7:541-551.
28. Polychronidou M., Hellwig A., Grosshans J. Farnesylated nuclear proteins Kugelkern and lamin Dm0 affect nuclear morphology by directly interacting with the nuclear membrane. Mol Biol Cell 2010, 21:3409-3420.
29. Olins A.L., Herrmann H., Lichter P., et al. Nuclear envelope and chromatin compositional differences comparing undifferentiated and retinoic acid-treated and phorbol ester-treated HL-60 cells. Exp Cell Res 2001, 268:115-127.
30. Hoffmann K., Dreger C.K., Olins A.L., et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the lamin B receptor produce an altered nuclear morphology in granulocytes (Pelger-Huet anomaly). Nat Genet 2002, 31:410-414.
31. Mazumder A., Shivashankar G.V. Emergence of a prestressed eukaryotic nucleus during cellular differentiation and development. J R Soc Interface 2010, 7(Suppl. 3):S321-S330.
32. Khatau S.B., Hale C.M., Stewart-Hutchinson P.J., et al. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:19017-19022.
33. Thomas C.H., Collier J.H., Sfeir C.S., Healy K.E. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:1972-1977.
34. Maniotis A.J., Chen C.S., Ingber D.E. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:849-854.
35. Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:75-82.
36. Haque F., Mazzeo D., Patel J.T., et al. Mammalian SUN protein interaction networks at the inner nuclear membrane and their role in laminopathy disease processes. J Biol Chem 2010, 285:3487-3498.
37. Starr D.A. A nuclear-envelope bridge positions nuclei and moves chromosomes. J Cell Sci 2009, 122:577-586.
38. Lombardi M.L., Jaalouk D.E., Shanahan C.M., et al. The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:26743-26753.
39. Stewart-Hutchinson P.J., Hale C.M., Wirtz D., Hodzic D. Structural requirements for the assembly of LINC complexes and their function in cellular mechanical stiffness. Exp Cell Res 2008, 314:1892-1905.
40. Lee J.S., Hale C.M., Panorchan P., et al. Nuclear lamin A/C deficiency induces defects in cell mechanics, polarization, and migration. Biophys J 2007, 93:2542-2552.
41. Ji J.Y., Lee R.T., Vergnes L., et al. Cell nuclei spin in the absence of lamin b1. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:20015-20026.
42. Chikashige Y., Tsutsumi C., Yamane M., et al. Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell 2006, 125:59-69.
43. Penkner A., Tang L., Novatchkova M., et al. The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 2007, 12:873-885.
44. Sato A., Isaac B., Phillips C.M., et al. Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 2009, 139:907-919.
45. Chikashige Y., Haraguchi T., Hiraoka Y. Another way to move chromosomes. Chromosoma 2007, 116:497-505.
46. Efroni S., Duttagupta R., Cheng J., et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:437-447.
47. Cremer T., Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2:a003889.
48. Schoenfelder S., Sexton T., Chakalova L., et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010, 42:53-61.
49. Bartova E., Kozubek S. Nuclear architecture in the light of gene expression and cell differentiation studies. Biol Cell 2006, 98:323-336.
50. Geyer P.K., Vitalini M.W., Wallrath L.L. Nuclear organization: taking a position on gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011, 23:354-359.
51. Bantignies F., Roure V., Comet I., et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 2011, 144:214-226.
52. Tolhuis B., Blom M., Kerkhoven R.M., et al. Interactions among polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1001343.
53. van Steensel B., Henikoff S. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:424-428.
54. van Bemmel J.G., Pagie L., Braunschweig U., et al. The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome. PLoS One 2010, 5:e15013.
55. Kalverda B., Fornerod M. Characterization of genome-nucleoporin interactions in Drosophila links chromatin insulators to the nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:4812-4817.
56. Pickersgill H., Kalverda B., de Wit E., et al. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat Genet 2006, 38:1005-1014.
57. Guelen L., Pagie L., Brasset E., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.
58. Kalverda B., Pickersgill H., Shloma V.V., Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010, 140:360-371.
59. Capelson M., Liang Y., Schulte R., et al. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010, 140:372-383.
60. Vaquerizas J.M., Suyama R., Kind J., et al. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000846.
61. Kind J., van Steensel B. Genome-nuclear lamina interactions and gene regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010, 22:320-325.
62. Arib G., Akhtar A. Multiple facets of nuclear periphery in gene expression control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011, 23:346-353.
63. Mazumder A., Roopa T., Basu A., et al. Dynamics of chromatin decondensation reveals the structural integrity of a mechanically prestressed nucleus. Biophys J 2008, 95:3028-3035.
64. Mazumder A., Shivashankar G.V. Gold-nanoparticle-assisted laser perturbation of chromatin assembly reveals unusual aspects of nuclear architecture within living cells. Biophys J 2007, 93:2209-2216.
65. King M.C., Drivas T.G., Blobel G. A network of nuclear envelope membrane proteins linking centromeres to microtubules. Cell 2008, 134:427-438.
66. Meshorer E., Yellajoshula D., George E., et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 2006, 10:105-116.
67. Bhattacharya D., Talwar S., Mazumder A., Shivashankar G.V. Spatio-temporal plasticity in chromatin organization in mouse cell differentiation and during Drosophila embryogenesis. Biophys J 2009, 96:3832-3839.
68. Meister P., Towbin B.D., Pike B.L., et al. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev 2010, 24:766-782.
69. Peric-Hupkes D., Meuleman W., Pagie L., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010, 38:603-613.
70. Brandt A., Papagiannouli F., Wagner N., et al. Developmental control of nuclear size and shape by Kugelkern and Kurzkern. Curr Biol 2006, 16:543-552.
71. Daniels B.R., Hale C.M., Khatau S.B., et al. Differences in the microrheology of human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biophys J 2010, 99:3563-3570.
72. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
73. Tse J.R., Engler A.J. Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PLoS One 2011, 6:e15978.