The concepts of representation

American Political Science Review

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 631-641

  Rehfeld, Andrew ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555172368     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000190     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackerman, Bruce, and James Fishkin. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Barry, Brian. [1965] 1990. Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction (California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Cannon, David. 2008. "The Representational Consequences of a Random National Constituency." Polity 40 (2): 221-28.
5. Connolly, William E. 1974. The Terms of Political Discourse. Indianapolis, IN: Lexington.
6. Collier, David, and John Gerring, eds. 2008. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovani Sartori. New York: Routledge.
7. Disch, Lisa. 2011. "Toward aMobilization Conception of Democratic Representation." American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100- 14)
8. Eulau, Heinz, John C. Wahlke, William Buchanan, and Leroy C. Ferguson. 1959. "The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke." American Political Science Review 53 (3): 742-56.
9. Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.
10. Gallie, W. B. 1956. "Essentially Contested Concepts." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-98.
11. Gerring, John. 1999. "WhatMakes a Concept Good? An Integrated Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences." Polity 31 (3): 357-93.
12. Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A Users Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Goodman,Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Hart, H. L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hayward, Clarissa. 2010. "Making Interest: On Representation and Democratic Legitimacy." In Political Representation, eds, Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 111-35.
16. Hempel, Carl. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Prentice Hall.
17. Mair, Peter. 2008. "Concepts and Concept Formation." In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, eds. Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mair, Peter. 2009. "Guest Letter: Getting the Concepts Rights." Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 20 (2): 1-4.
19. Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of RepresentativeGovernment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. "Rethinking Representation." American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515-28. (Pubitemid 37537547)
21. Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. "A Selection Model of Political Representation." Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369-98.
22. Mansbridge, Jane. 2011. "Clarifying the Concept ofRepresentation. " American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621-30.
23. Margolis, Eric, and Stephen Laurence, eds. 1999. Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Mayo,Henry Bertram. 1960. An Introduction toDemocratic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Montanaro, Laura. 2011. "The Democratic Legitimacy of Self- AppointedRepresentatives." University of British Columbia. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and InstitutionalDesign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. "Towards a General Theory of PoliticalRepresentation." Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1-21. (Pubitemid 43448393)
30. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2008. "Extremism in the Defense of Moderation: A Response to My Critics." Polity 40 (1): 254-71.
31. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. "Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy." American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214-30.
32. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2010. "On Quotas and Qualifications for Office." In Political Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236-68.
33. Rubenstein, Jennifer. 2007. "Accountability in an Unequal World." Journal of Politics 69 (3): 616-32
34. Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Schwartz, Nancy. 1988. The Blue Guitar: Political Representation and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. "Dynamic Representation." American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543-56.
37. Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. "Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation." Political Theory 28 (6): 758-86.
38. Urbinati,Nadia, and Mark E.Warren. 2008. "The Concept ofRepresentation in Contemporary Democratic Theory." Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387-412.
39. Warren, Mark E. 2008. "Citizen Representatives." In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens Assembly, eds. Mark E. Warren and Hilary Pearse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Politics of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Williams, Melissa. 2008. "Rehfelds Hyper-Madisonianism." Polity 40 (April): 238-45.
42. Young, IrisMarion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 641