Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation

American Political Science Review

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 100-114

  Disch, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053977659     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055410000602     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 1975. "Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response. " American Political Science Review 69 (4): 1218-31.
2. Althaus, Scott, Jill Edy, Robert Entman, and Patricia Phelen. 1996. "Revising the Indexing Hypothesis: Officials, Media and the Libya Crisis. " Political Communication 13 (4): 407-21. (Pubitemid 126175470)
3. Ankersmit, F. R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Barber, Benjamin, R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Bartels, Larry. 2003. "Democracy with Attitudes. " In Electoral Democracy, eds. MichaelB. McKuen andGeorgeRabinowitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 48-82.
6. Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. "Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations. " Journal of Communication 40 (2): 103-25.
7. Bennett, W. Lance, and Jarol B. Manheim. 1993. "Taking the Public by Storm: Information, Cueing, and the Democratic Process in the Gulf Conflict. " Political Communication 10 (4): 331-52.
8. Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bickford, Susan. 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Bohman, James. 1988. "Emancipation and Rhetoric: The Perlocutions and Illocutions of the Social Critic. " Philosophy and Rhetoric 21 (3): 185-204.
11. Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bourdieu, Pierre. [1981] 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed and intro. John B. Thompson. Trans. Gino Raymond andMatthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Butler, Judith. 1995. "For a Careful Reading. " In Feminist Contentions, eds. Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell, and Nancy Fraser. New York: Routledge, 127-44.
14. Carmines, E., and J. Kuklinski. 1990. "Incentives, Opportunities and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation. " In Information and Democratic Processes, eds. J. A. Ferejohn and J. Kuklinsky. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 240-68.
15. Chong, Dennis. 2000. Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Chong, Dennis, and James Druckman. 2007. "Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. " American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637-55.
17. Cohen, Joshua. 1986. "An Epistemic Conception of Democracy. " Ethics 97: 26-38.
18. Cohen, Joshua. 1989. "Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. " In The Good Polity, eds. A. Hamlin and P. Pettit. New York: Basil Blackwell, 17-34.
19. Condorcet, Marquis de. 1793. "Plan de Constitution, presente à la Convention Nationale, les 15 & 16 fevrier 1793, lan II de la Republique. " http://mjp. univ-perp. fr/france/co1793pr. htm (accessed January 28, 2011).
20. Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Derrida, Jacques. [1967] 1973. "Speech and Phenomena: Introduction to the Problem of Signs in Husserls Phenomenology. " In Speech and Phenomena, trans. David B. Allison. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 17-104.
23. Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. "Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just AnyWoman,Black or Latino Do?" AmericanPolitical Science Review 96 (4): 729-43. (Pubitemid 36086441)
24. Druckman, James N. 2001a. "The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. " Political Behavior 23 (3): 225-56. (Pubitemid 33386017)
25. Druckman, James N. 2001b. "Evaluating Framing Effects. " Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 91-101. (Pubitemid 33376929)
26. Druckman, James N. 2004. "Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. " American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671-86. (Pubitemid 40046045)
27. Druckman, James N. 2010. "Whats ItAll About? Framing in Political Science. " In Perspectives on Framing, ed. Gideon Keren. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis, 279-302
28. Druckman, James N., Cari Lynn Hennessy, Kristi St. Charles, and JonathanWebber. 2010. "Competing Rhetoric over Time: Frames vs. Cues. " Journal of Politics 72 (1): 136-48.
29. Druckman, James N., and Arthur Lupia. 2000. "Preference Formation. " Annual Review of Political Science 3: 1-24. (Pubitemid 33281293)
30. Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps. 1977. "The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness. " Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 241-47.
31. Forst, Rainer. 2001. "The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy. " Ratio Juris 14 (4): 345-78.
32. Forst,Rainer. 2010. "The Justification ofHumanRights and theBasic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach. " Ethics 120: 711-40.
33. Gamson,WilliamA., andAndreModigliani. 1989. "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. " American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1-37.
34. Garsten, Bryan. 2006. Saving Persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Garsten, Bryan. 2009. "Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty. " In Political Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth JeanWood, andAlexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90-110.
36. Gerber, Elizabeth, and John E. Jackson. 1993. "Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions. " American Political Science Review 87 (3): 639-56.
37. Goodin, Robert E., and John S. Dryzek. 2006. "Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-political Uptake of Mini-publics. " Politics and Society 34 (20): 219-44. (Pubitemid 43742315)
38. Grant, Ruth, and Robert O. Keohane. 2005. "Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. " American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29-44.
39. Habermas, Jurgen. 1988. Between Facts and Norms. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Hansen, S. B. 1975. "Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence. " American Political Science Review 69 (4): 1181-99.
42. Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. "Congressional Enactments of Race- Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions. " American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529-50. (Pubitemid 37537548)
43. Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2009. "Making Interest: On Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. " In Political Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth JeanWood, and Alexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111-35.
44. Jacobs, Lawrence, and Robert J. Shapiro. 2000. Politicians Dont Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Jewell, Malcolm. 1983. "Legislator-Constituency Relations and the Representative Process. " Legislative Studies Quarterly 8 (3): 303-37.
46. Kaplan, Michael. 2003. "Iconomics: The Rhetoric of Speculation. " Public Culture 15 (3): 477-93. (Pubitemid 37306735)
47. Kinder, Donald R., and Thomas E. Nelson. 2005. "Democratic Debate andReal Opinions. " In FramingAmericanPolitics, eds. Karen J. Callaghan, Frauke Schnell, and Robert M. Entman. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 103-22.
48. Kinder, Donald R., and Lynn Sanders. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Koselleck, Reinhart. [1979] 2004. "History, Histories, and Formal Time Structures. " In Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans and intro. Keith Tribe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 93-104.
50. Kuklinski, James H., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, and Robert F. Rich. 2001. "The Political Environment and Citizen Competence. " American Journal of Political Science 45 (20): 410-24. (Pubitemid 33391313)
51. Kuklinski, James H., and GaryM. Segura. 1995. "Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation. " Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (1): 3-21.
52. Lavaque-Manty, Mika. 2006. "Bentley, Truman and the Study of Groups. " Annual Review of Political Science 9: 1-18.
53. Lavaque-Manty, Mika. 2009. "Finding Theoretical Concepts in the RealWorld: The Case of the Precariat. " In NewWaves in Political Philosophy, eds. Boudewijn de Bruin and Christopher F. Zurn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 105-24.
54. Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipations. New York: Verso.
55. Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
56. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. New York: Verso.
57. Lupia, Arthur. 1992. "Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information. " American Political Science Review 86 (2): 390-403.
58. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. "Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. " American Political Science Review 88 (1): 63-76.
59. Lupia, Arthur, and Matthew McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of RepresentativeGovernment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes. " Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628-57.
62. Mansbridge, Jane J. 2003. "Rethinking Representation. " American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515-28.
63. Manza, Jeff, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2002. "A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States. " American Politics Research 30 (6): 630-67. (Pubitemid 36668741)
64. McClure, Kirstie. 1992. "On the Subject of Rights: Pluralism, Plurality and Political Identity. " In Dimensions of Radical Democracy, ed. Chantal Mouffe. New York: Verso, 108-27.
65. Miller, James. 1987. Democracy Is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago. New York: Simon and Schuster.
66. Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. "Constituency Influence in Congress. " American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45-56.
67. Montanero, Laura. 2010. "The Democratic Legitimacy of Selfappointed Representatives. " Ph. D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.
68. N asstrom, Sofia. 2006. "Representative Democracy as Tautology. " European Journal of Political Theory 5 (3): 321-42.
69. ONeill, Onora. 2002. "Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. " In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347-67.
70. Page, Benjamin I., and RobertY. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Peterson, Paul. 1970. "Forms of Representation: Participation of the Poor in the Community Action Program. " American Political Science Review 64 (2): 491-507.
73. Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74. Pikin, Hanna. 1989. "Representation. " In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, eds. Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell L. Hanson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132-41.
75. Pitkin, Hanna. 2004. "Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance. " Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335-42. (Pubitemid 39210009)
76. Plotke, David. 1997. "Representation is Democracy. " Constellations 4 (1): 19-34.
77. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Political Campaigns. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
78. Prewitt, Kenneth, and Heinz Eulau. 1969. "Political Matrix and Political Representation: Prolegomenon to a New Departure from an Old Problem. " American Political Science Review 63 (2): 427-41.
79. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. "Towards a General Theory of Representation. " Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1-21.
80. Rogowski, Ronald. 1981. "Representation in Political Theory and in Law. " Ethics 91 (3): 395-430.
81. Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. La LegitimiteDemocratique: Impartialite, Reflexivite, Proximite. Paris: Seuil.
82. Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
84. Runciman, David. 2007. "The Paradox of Political Representation. " Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 93-114.
85. Saward,Michael. 2006. "The Representative Claim. " Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297-318.
86. Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. [1960] 1975. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
88. Schwartz, Nancy L. 1988. The Blue Guitar: Political Representation and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89. Seitz, Brian. 1995. The Trace of Political Representation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
90. Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. "Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning. " In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, eds. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. Mc- Cubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. NewYork: CambridgeUniversity Press, 67-84.
91. Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Sniderman, Paul M., andMatthew S. Levendusky. 2007. "An Institutional Theory of Political Choice. " In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press, 437-56.
93. Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 2004. "The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. " In Studies in Public Opinion, eds. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 133-65.
94. Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1988. "Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. " International Social Movement Research 1: 197-217.
95. Squires, Judith. 2008. "The Constitutive Representation of Gender: Extra-parliamentary Re-presentation of Gender Relations. " Representation 44 (2): 187-204.
96. Sunstein, Cass. 1991. "Preferences and Politics. " Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (10): 3-34.
97. Urbinati,Nadia. 2006. RepresentativeDemocracy: Principles andGenealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Urbinati,Nadia, and Mark E. Warren. 2008. "The Concept ofRepresentation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. " Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387-412.
99. Wahlke, John C. 1971. "Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of theRepresented. " British Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 271-90.
100. Warren, Mark E., and Dario Castiglione. N. d. "Rethinking Democratic Representation: Eight Theoretical Issues. " Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Canada.
101. Williams, Melissa. 1990. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
102. Young, Iris Marion. 1997. "Deferring Group Representation. " In NOMOS XXXIX, Ethnicity and Group Rights, eds. Ian Shapiro andWillKymlicka. NewYork: NewYorkUniversity Press, 349-76.
103. Young, IrisMarion. 2000. Inclusion andDemocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins ofMassOpinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.