Clarifying the concept of representation

American Political Science Review

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 621-630

  Mansbridge, Jane ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555168036     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000189     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aristotle. [335-22 B.C.]. 1988. Politics. Trans. Benjamin Jowett, ed. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Arnold, Douglas R. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Beitz, Charles R. 1989. Political Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Besley, Timothy. 2005. "Political Selection." Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (3): 43-60. (Pubitemid 41634737)
5. Besley, Timothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Besley, Timothy, and Maitreesh Ghatak. 2005. "Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents." American Economic Review 95 (3): 616-36. (Pubitemid 43104406)
7. Brennan, Geoffrey. 1996. "Selection and the Currency of Reward." In The Theory of InstitutionalDesign, ed. Robert E. Goodin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Burke, Edmund. [1774] 1889. "Speech to the Electors of Bristol." In The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, Vol. 2. Boston: Little Brown.
10. Cavanaugh, Thomas E. 1982. "The Calculus of Representation: A Congressional Perspective." Western Political Quarterly 35 (1): 120-29.
11. Chabal, Patrick, and Jean-Pascal Daloz. 2006. Culture Troubles: Politics and the Interpretation of Meaning. London: Hurst.
12. Davidson, Roger H. 1969. The Role of the Congressman. NewYork: Pegasus.
13. Eulau, Heinz, John C. Wahlke, William Buchanan, and Leroy C. Ferguson. 1959. "The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke." American Political Science Review 53 (3): 742-56.
14. Fearon, James. 1999. "Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians." In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.
16. Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. "Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees." Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421-47.
17. Gimple, James G., Frances E. Lee, and Shanna Pearson-Merkovitz. 2008. "The Check is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 373-94.
18. Garrett, Elizabeth. 1996. "Term Limitations and the Myth of the Citizen-Legislator." Cornell Law Review 81: 623-97. (Pubitemid 127003140)
19. Herzog,Don. 1998. Poisoning theMinds of theLower Orders. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Kartik, Navin, and R. Preston McAfee. 2007. "Signaling Character in Electoral Competition." American Economic Review 97 (3): 852-70.
21. Kingdon, JohnW. 1981. Congressmens Voting Decisions. NewYork: Harper and Row.
22. Kymlicka,Will. 1993. "Group Representation in Canadian Politics." In Equity and Community, ed. F. L. Siedle.Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
23. Lee, David S., Enrico Moretti, and Matthew J. Butler. 2004. "Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U.S. House." Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 807-60. (Pubitemid 39057308)
24. Manin, Bernard. 1997. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. WhyWe Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes." Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628-57.
28. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. "Rethinking Representation." American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515-28. (Pubitemid 37537547)
29. Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. "A Selection Model of Political Representation." Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369-99.
30. McGregor, Douglas. 1960. TheHuman Side of Enterprise. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
31. McMurray, CarlD., and MalcolmB. Parsons. 1965. "Public Attitudes toward the Representational Roles of Legislators and Judges." Midwest Journal of Political Science 9 (2): 167-85.
32. Montanaro, Laura. 2008. "The Democratic Potential of Selfauthorized Representatives." Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
33. Pettit, Philip. 2008. "Three Conceptions of Democratic Control." Constellations 15 (1): 46-55.
34. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. [1967] 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Prewitt, Kenneth. 1970. "Political Ambitions, Volunteerism, and Electoral Accountability." American Political Science Review 64 (1): 5-17.
36. Pratt, John W., and Richard J. Zeckhauser, eds. 1985. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
37. Putnam, Robert D. 1973. The Beliefs of Politicians: Ideology, Conflict, and Democracy in Britain and Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and InstitutionalDesign.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. "Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy." American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214-30.
40. Rubenstein, Jennifer. 2007. "Accountability in an Unequal World." Journal of Politics 69 (3): 616-32.
41. Rubenstein, Jennifer. 2008. "The Ethics of NGO Advocacy, or Why It Is OK That No One Elected Oxfam." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
42. Saward, Michael. 2006. "The Representative Claim." Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297-318.
43. Saward, Michael. 2009. "Authorisation and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected." Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1): 1-22.
44. Shipman, Tim. 2008. "Sarah Palin: John McCains Secret Weapon to Win Over the Reagan Democrats." Telegraph, September 6. http://www.telegraph. co.uk/ news/newstopics/uselection2008/ johnmccain/2695021/Sarah-Palin-John- McCains-secret-weaponto- win-over-the-Reagan-Democrats.html (accessed June 24, 2010).
45. Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1981. The Complete Anti-Federalist, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. "Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science." Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497-520.
47. Tremblay, Manon. 2006. "The SubstantiveRepresentation ofWomen and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass." Politics and Gender 2 (4): 502-11.
48. Urbinati,Nadia, and Mark E.Warren. 2008. "The Concept ofRepresentation in Contemporary Democratic Theory." Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387-412.
49. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995 Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Weissberg, Robert. 1978. "Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress." American Political Science Review 72 (2): 535-47.
51. Will, George F. 1992. Restoration: Congress, Term Limits, and the Recovery of Deliberative Democracy. New York: Free Press.