Representation rethought: On trustees, delegates, and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy

American Political Science Review

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 214-230

  Rehfeld, Andrew ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651083345     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055409090261     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amy, Douglass. 1993. RealVoicesNewChoices.NewYork: Columbia University Press.
2. Ankersmit, F. R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Applebaum, Arthur Isak. 1999. Ethics for Adversaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Beerbohm, Eric. 2007. Democratic Complicity. Ph.D. diss. Department of Politics, Princeton University.
5. Brunell, Thomas L. 2006. "Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Uncompetitive Districts Eliminates Gerrymanders, Enhances Representation, and Improves Attitudes Toward Congress." PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (January): 77-85.
6. Brunell,Thomas L. 2008. Redistricting and Representation: WhyConpetitive Elections Are Bad for America. New York: Routledge.
7. Burke, Edmund. 1774. "Speech to the Electors of Bristol." In Works, New York: Harpers. 446-8.
8. Cicero,Marcus Tullius. 1999. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (Cambridge Texts in theHistory of Political Thought), ed. James E. G. Zetzel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. TheGood Representative.Malden, MA: Blackwell. Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Elkin, Stephen. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Fasolt, Constantin. 1991. "Quod Omnes Tangit Ab Omnibus Approbari Debet: The Words and the Meaning." In In Iure Veritas: Studies in Canon Law inMemory of SchaferWilliams, eds. Steven Bowman and Blanche Cody. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati College of Law.
14. Fearon, JamesD. 1999. "Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance." In Democracy, Accountability and Representation. eds. Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55-97.
15. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994. "Enhancing Democracy Through LegislativeRedistricting." American Political Science Review 88 (September): 541-59.
16. Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
18. Hart,H. L.A. 1961. The Concept ofLaw. London: Oxford University Press.
19. Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2009. "Who Loses in American Democracy? A Count of Votes Demonstrates the Limited Representation of African Americans." American Political Science Review 103 (1): 37-58.
20. Kenyon, Cecilia ed. 1966. The Anti-Federalists. New York: Bobbs- Merrill.
21. Kurland, Philip B., and Ralph Lerner, eds. 1987. The Founders Constitution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Locke, John. [1690] 1988. "Second Treatise of Government." In Two Treatises of Government. ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lovett, Francis. 2004. "Can Justice Be Based on Consent." Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (March): 79-101.
24. Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Prrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Mair, Peter. 2006. "Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy." New Left Review (Nov/Dec): 25-51.
26. Mansbridge, Jane N.d. "A 'Selection Model' of Political Representation." Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.
27. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. "Rethinking Representation." American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515-28.
28. Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Claredon Press.
29. Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge Studies in theTheory of Democracy. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
32. Putnam, Hillary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Rakove, Jack. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in theMaking of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
34. Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2003. "Review of Ankersmit, F.R., PoliticalRepresentation. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002)." Ethics (July): 865-8.
37. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. "Toward a General Theory of Political Representation." The Journal of Politics 68 (February): 1- 21.
39. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009a. Political Representation: An Explanatory Account. Manuscript. Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis.
40. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009b. "On Quotas and Qualifications for Office." In Political Representation and Democratic Self Rule, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan Stokes, and ElisabethWood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Richie, Robert, and Steven Hill. 1999. Relecting All of Us: The Case for proportional Representation. eds. Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers. Boston: Beacon Press.
42. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1978. On the Social Contract. ed. RogerD. Masters. Trans. Judith R. Masters. New York: St.Mary's.
43. Sabl,Andrew. 2002. RulingPassions:PoliticalOffices andDemocratic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Shapiro, Ian. 2005. "Gross Concepts in Political Argument." In The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 152-77.
45. Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Sunstein, Cass. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Thompson, Dennis. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, andHealth Care.NewYork:Cambridge University Press.
48. Truman, David. 1953. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
49. Urbinati, Nadia. 2008. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
50. Vermeule, Adrian. 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Williams,Melissa. 1999. Voice, Trust,Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press.