Characterizing weak protein-protein complexes by NMR residual dipolar couplings

European Biophysics Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1371-1381

  Jensen, Malene Ringkjøbing ^a   Ortega Roldan, Jose Luis ^b   Salmon, Loïc ^a   Van Nuland, Nico ^c   Blackledge, Martin ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE BIOLOGIE STRUCTURALE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complex; Dynamics; Interaction; NMR; Protein; Structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; INSTRUMENTATION; MACROMOLECULE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 82455187977     PISSN: 01757571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-011-0720-5     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Q Bashir, et al. 2010 Visualization of the encounter ensemble of the transient electron transfer complex of cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase J Am Chem Soc 132 241 247 19961227 10.1021/ja9064574 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXhsFWmurrI
2. A Bax 2003 Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics Protein Sci 12 1 16 12493823 10.1110/ps.0233303 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXht1ehuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36020129)
3. A Bax A Grishaev 2005 Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 563 570 16140525 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.08.006 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVKjsLzJ (Pubitemid 41393488)
4. W Bermel, et al. 2009 Simultaneous measurement of residual dipolar couplings for proteins in complex using the isotopically discriminated NMR approach J Am Chem Soc 131 8564 8570 19485366 10.1021/ja901602c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXms1egu7g%3D
5. P Bernadó M Blackledge 2004 Local dynamic amplitudes on the protein backbone from dipolar couplings: toward the elucidation of slower motions in biomolecules J Am Chem Soc 126 7760 7761 15212507 10.1021/ja048785m (Pubitemid 38812751)
6. I Bezsonova, et al. 2008 Interactions between the three CIN85 SH3 domains and ubiquitin: implications for CIN85 ubiquitination Biochemistry 47 8937 8949 18680311 10.1021/bi800439t 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXptlejs7Y%3D
7. M Blackledge 2005 Recent progress in the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in solution from residual dipolar couplings Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 46 23 61 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2004.11.002 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXisFahtrY%3D (Pubitemid 40357061)
8. PJ Bolon HM Al-Hashimi JH Prestegard 1999 Residual dipolar coupling derived orientational constraints on ligand geometry in a 53 kDa protein-ligand complex J Mol Biol 293 107 115 10512719 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3133 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmtlCrsb0%3D (Pubitemid 29494873)
9. G Bouvignies, et al. 2005 Identification of slow correlated motions in proteins using residual dipolar and hydrogen-bond scalar couplings Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 13885 13890 16172390 10.1073/pnas.0505129102 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVOqsbvK (Pubitemid 41377673)
10. G Bouvignies P Markwick R Brüschweiler M Blackledge 2006 Simultaneous determination of protein backbone structure and dynamics from residual dipolar couplings J Am Chem Soc 128 15100 15101 17117856 10.1021/ja066704b 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFKrs7bL (Pubitemid 44853519)
11. GM Clore CD Schwieters 2004 How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J Am Chem Soc 126 2923 2938 14995210 10.1021/ja0386804 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFagtrg%3D (Pubitemid 38314298)
12. GM Clore MR Starich AM Gronenborn 1998 Measurement of residual dipolar couplings of macromolecules aligned in the nematic phase of a colloidal suspension of rod-shaped viruses J Am Chem Soc 120 10571 10572 10.1021/ja982592f 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmtV2ltbs%3D (Pubitemid 28500376)
13. C Dominguez R Boelens AMJJ Bonvin 2003 HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information J Am Chem Soc 125 1731 1737 12580598 10.1021/ja026939x 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvFGquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36232568)
14. Emsley JW, Lindon JC (1975) NMR spectroscopy using liquid crystal solvents. Pergamon Press, Oxford
15. L Fielding 2007 NMR methods for the determination of protein-ligand dissociation constants Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 51 219 242 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2007.04.001 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1ynu77I (Pubitemid 350064300)
16. MR Hansen L Mueller A Pardi 1998 Tunable alignment of macromolecules by filamentous phage yields dipolar coupling interactions Nat Struct Biol 5 1065 1074 9846877 10.1038/4176 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvFOlu7k%3D (Pubitemid 28546270)
17. Y He L Hicke I Radhakrishnan 2007 Structural basis for ubiquitin recognition by SH3 domains J Mol Biol 373 190 196 17765920 10.1016/j.jmb.2007. 07.074 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVCgtbbO (Pubitemid 47390722)
18. J Hus, et al. 2008 16-fold degeneracy of peptide plane orientations from residual dipolar couplings: analytical treatment and implications for protein structure determination J Am Chem Soc 130 15927 15937 18959402 10.1021/ja804274s 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqurjK
19. NU Jain S Noble JH Prestegard 2003 Structural characterization of a mannose-binding protein-trimannoside complex using residual dipolar couplings J Mol Biol 328 451 462 12691753 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00268-7 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXisleht78%3D (Pubitemid 36407587)
20. NU Jain, et al. 2004 Rapid analysis of large protein-protein complexes using NMR-derived orientational constraints: the 95 kDa complex of LpxA with acyl carrier protein J Mol Biol 343 1379 1389 15491619 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.103 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1Kksr4%3D (Pubitemid 39387832)
21. MR Jensen, et al. 2008 Quantitative conformational analysis of partially folded proteins from residual dipolar couplings: application to the molecular recognition element of Sendai virus nucleoprotein J Am Chem Soc 130 8055 8061 18507376 10.1021/ja801332d 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmsVelsbg%3D (Pubitemid 351875082)
22. MR Jensen, et al. 2009 Quantitative determination of the conformational properties of partially folded and intrinsically disordered proteins using NMR dipolar couplings Structure 17 1169 1185 19748338 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.001 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFanu7jN
23. J Kang, et al. 2008 Distinct interactions between ubiquitin and the SH3 domains involved in immune signaling Biochim Biophys Acta 1784 1335 1341 18539162 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVShs73I
24. BW Koenig, et al. 2002 Structure and orientation of a G protein fragment in the receptor bound state from residual dipolar couplings J Mol Biol 322 441 461 12217702 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00745-3 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xms1Wru7o%3D
25. DM Korzhnev, et al. 2009 Alternate binding modes for a ubiquitin-SH3 domain interaction studied by NMR spectroscopy J Mol Biol 386 391 405 19111555 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.11.055 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhs1arsrY%3D
26. OF Lange, et al. 2008 Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution Science 320 1471 1475 18556554 10.1126/science.1157092 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXntVWqs70%3D (Pubitemid 351929422)
27. A Lange, et al. 2010 NMR reveals a different mode of binding of the Stam2 VHS domain to ubiquitin and diubiquitin Biochemistry 50 48 62 10.1021/bi101594a
28. H Lee, et al. 2010 Three-dimensional structure of the weakly associated protein homodimer SeR13 using RDCs and paramagnetic surface mapping Protein Sci 19 1673 1685 20589905 10.1002/pro.447 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtV2gsLrO
29. RS Lipsitz N Tjandra 2004 Residual dipolar couplings in NMR structure analysis Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 33 387 413 15139819 10.1146/annurev. biophys.33.110502.140306 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltlKkt7g%3D (Pubitemid 38829965)
30. PRL Markwick, et al. 2009 Toward a unified representation of protein structural dynamics in solution J Am Chem Soc 131 16968 16975 19919148 10.1021/ja907476w 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtlGjtrzF
31. J Meiler, et al. 2001 Model-free approach to the dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in globular proteins J Am Chem Soc 123 6098 6107 11414844 10.1021/ja010002z 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjvVWhsr0%3D (Pubitemid 32888479)
32. G Nodet L Salmon V Ozenne S Meier MR Jensen M Blackledge 2009 Quantitative description of backbone conformational sampling of unfolded proteins at amino acid resolution from NMR residual dipolar couplings J Am Chem Soc 131 17908 17918 19908838 10.1021/ja9069024 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVSmu7zK
33. MR O'Connell R Gamsjaeger JP Mackay 2009 The structural analysis of protein-protein interactions by NMR spectroscopy Proteomics 9 5224 5232 19834907 10.1002/pmic.200900303
34. JL Ortega Roldan, et al. 2007 The high resolution NMR structure of the third SH3 domain of CD2AP J Biomol NMR 39 331 336 17922258 10.1007/s10858-007- 9201-7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1Grs7zN (Pubitemid 350055755)
35. JL Ortega Roldan, et al. 2009 Accurate characterization of weak macromolecular interactions by titration of NMR residual dipolar couplings: application to the CD2AP SH3-C:ubiquitin complex Nucleic Acids Res 37 e70 19359362 10.1093/nar/gkp211
36. Ortega Roldan JL, Blackledge M, van Nuland NAJ, Azuaga AI (2011) Solution structure, dynamics and thermodynamics of the three SH3 domains of CD2AP. J Biomol NMR 50:103-117
37. JH Prestegard HM al-Hashimi JR Tolman 2000 NMR structures of biomolecules using field oriented media and residual dipolar couplings Q Rev Biophys 33 371 424 11233409 10.1017/S0033583500003656 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntFGmurg%3D (Pubitemid 32151707)
38. M Rückert G Otting 2000 Alignment of biological macromolecules in novel nonionic liquid crystalline media for NMR experiments J Am Chem Soc 122 7793 7797 10.1021/ja001068h
39. L Salmon, et al. 2009 Protein conformational flexibility from structure-free analysis of NMR dipolar couplings: quantitative and absolute determination of backbone motion in ubiquitin Angew Chem 48 4154 4157 10.1002/anie.200900476 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmsVSit74%3D
40. L Salmon, et al. 2010 NMR characterization of long-range order in intrinsically disordered proteins J Am Chem Soc 132 8407 8418 20499903 10.1021/ja101645g 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmsFOks74%3D
41. L Salmon, et al. 2011 Structure, dynamics, and kinetics of weak protein-protein complexes from NMR spin relaxation measurements of titrated solutions Angew Chem 50 3755 3759 10.1002/anie.201100310 1:CAS:528: DC%2BC3MXkt12jur4%3D
42. L Salmon G Bouvignies P Markwick M Blackledge 2011 Nuclear magnetic resonance provides a quantitative description of protein conformational flexibility on physiologically important time scales Biochemistry 50 2735 2747 21388216 10.1021/bi200177v 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjsVygt7g%3D
43. HJ Sass, et al. 2000 Solution NMR of proteins within polyacrylamide gels: diffusional properties and residual alignment by mechanical stress or embedding of oriented purple membranes J Biomol NMR 18 303 309 11200524 10.1023/A:1026703605147 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXns1KisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32065084)
44. G Schreiber AE Keating 2011 Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity Curr Opin Struct Biol 21 50 61 21071205 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.10.002 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhvFKhur0%3D
45. SD Stamenova, et al. 2007 Ubiquitin binds to and regulates a subset of SH3 domains Mol Cell 25 273 284 17244534 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.016 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhslKju7w%3D (Pubitemid 46109609)
46. K Takeuchi G Wagner 2006 NMR studies of protein interactions Curr Opin Struct Biol 16 109 117 16427776 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.006 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD28XhsFOjsrg%3D (Pubitemid 43221879)
47. N Tjandra A Bax 1997 Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium Science 278 1111 1114 9353189 10.1126/science.278.5340.1111 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXnt1aju7c%3D (Pubitemid 27517889)
48. JR Tolman 2002 A novel approach to the retrieval of structural and dynamic information from residual dipolar couplings using several oriented media in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy J Am Chem Soc 124 12020 12030 12358549 10.1021/ja0261123 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvFWlt7k%3D
49. JR Tolman, et al. 1995 Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 9279 9283 7568117 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9279 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXosVWltLg%3D
50. M Tonelli, et al. 2009 One-sample approach to determine the relative orientations of proteins in ternary and binary complexes from residual dipolar coupling measurements J Am Chem Soc 131 14138 14139 19764746 10.1021/ja904766g 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFCqtbrM
51. J Torbet G Maret 1979 Fibres of highly oriented Pf1 bacteriophage produced in a strong magnetic field J Mol Biol 134 843 845 537078 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90489-3 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXlsV2ktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 10133193)
52. R Tycko FJ Blanco Y Ishii 2000 Alignment of biopolymers in strained gels: a new way to create detectable dipole-dipole couplings in high-resolution biomolecular NMR J Am Chem Soc 122 9340 9341 10.1021/ja002133q 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmt1Kisb8%3D
53. J Vaynberg J Qin 2006 Weak protein-protein interactions as probed by NMR spectroscopy Trends Biotech 24 22 27 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.09.006 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XitFCrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43017747)
54. AN Volkov, et al. 2006 Solution structure and dynamics of the complex between cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase determined by paramagnetic NMR Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 18945 18950 17146057 10.1073/pnas.0603551103 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlChu77K (Pubitemid 350002808)
55. AN Volkov Q Bashir, et al. 2010 Shifting the equilibrium between the encounter state and the specific form of a protein complex by interfacial point mutations J Am Chem Soc 132 11487 11495 20672804 10.1021/ja100867c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpsV2lsr0%3D
56. AN Volkov M Ubbink NAJ van Nuland 2010 Mapping the encounter state of a transient protein complex by PRE NMR spectroscopy J Biomol NMR 48 225 236 21049303 10.1007/s10858-010-9452-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVeku7vE
57. ERP Zuiderweg 2002 Mapping protein-protein interactions in solution by NMR spectroscopy Biochemistry 41 1 7 11771996 10.1021/bi011870b 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXoslygsr8%3D (Pubitemid 34049375)