School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity

Educational Management Administration and Leadership

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 676-694

  McCharen, Belinda ^a   Song, Ji Hoon ^a   Martens, Jon ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

administration; innovation; organizational learning culture; schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 82355181280     PISSN: 17411432     EISSN: 17411440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1741143211416387     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Abernathy WJ,Utterback JM.Patterns of industrial innovation.Technology Review. 1978;80 (7): 40-47.
2. Abernathy WJ,Utterback JMReadings in the Management of Innovation. 1982) Patterns of industrial innovation. In: TushmanMLMooreWL (eds) Readings in the Management of Innovation. Boston, MA: Pitman, 97-108Tushman MLMoore WL, ed. Boston, MA: Pitman; 1982:97-108.
3. Argyris C,Schön DTheory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1974:.
4. Argyris C,Schön DOrganizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1996:.
5. Banbury CM,Mitchell W.The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival.Strategic Management Journal. 1995;16:161-182.
6. Bentler PM.Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107 (2): 238-246.
7. Bentler PM,Bonett DG.Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88 (3): 588-606.
8. Bonner M,Koch T,Langmeyer D.Organizational theory applied to school reform.School Psychology International. 2004;25 (4): 455-471.
9. Breaugh JA.The measurement of work autonomy.Human Relations. 1985;38 (6): 551-570.
10. Byrne B.Burnout: testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers.American Educational Research Journal. 1994;31 (3): 645-673.
11. Byrne BMStructural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998:.
12. Calantone RJ,Cavusgil ST,Zhao Y.Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance.Industrial Marketing Management. 2002;31 (6): 515-524.
13. Carl D Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §2301 et seq. (2006) Retrieved 23 January 2010 from Lexis/Nexis Congressional database.
14. Cohen WM,Levinthal DA.Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35 (1): 128-152.
15. Collinson V,Cook TF.'I don't have enough time': teachers' interpretations of time as a key to learning and school change.Journal of Educational Administration. 2001;39 (3): 266-281.
16. Conner M,Clawson JGCreating a Learning Culture: Strategy, Technology, and Practice. 2004) Creating a Learning Culture: Strategy, Technology, and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
17. Connolly M,James C.Collaboration for school improvement.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2006;34 (1): 69-87.
18. Crossman A,Harris P.Job satisfaction of secondary school teachers.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2006;34 (1): 29-46.
19. CrowtherFMcMasterJHannL (2001) School Innovation: Pathway to the Knowledge Society. Chapter 6-Leadership. Available at:http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/school_innovation/chapter_6.htm(accessed 24 January 2010).
20. Organization Development and Change. 2008) Organization Development and Change, 9th edn. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning Cummings TGWorley CG, ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2008:.
21. Deal TE,Bolman LGReframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. 2003) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership, 3rd edn. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003:.
22. Deal TE,Peterson KDShaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999:.
23. Evers CWSchool-based Decision-making and Management. 1990) Schooling, organizational learning and efficiency in the growth of knowledge. In: ChapmanJ (ed) School-based Decision-making and Management. London: Falmer, 132-149London: Falmer; 1990:132-149.
24. Frese M,Fay DResearch in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23. 2001) Personal initiative (PI): a concept for work in the 21st century. In: StawBMSuttonRM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 133-188Staw BMSutton RM, ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2001:133-188.
25. Fried Y,Ferris GR.The validity of the job characteristics model: a review and meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology. 1987;40 (2): 287-322.
26. Fried Y,Hollenbeck JR,Slowik LH,Tiegs RB,Ben-David HA.Changes in job decision latitude: the influence of personality and interpersonal satisfaction.Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1999;54 (2): 233-243.
27. Garvin DA.Building a learning organization.Harvard Business Review. 1993;71 (4): 78-91.
28. Garvin DALearning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2000:.
29. Gilley JW,Maycunich ABeyond the Learning Organization: Creating a Culture of Continuous Growth and Development Through State-of-the-Art Human Resource Practices. Cambridge, MA: Perseus; 2000:.
30. Gilley JW,Maycunich AOrganizational Learning, Performance and Change: An Introduction to Strategic Human Resource Development. Cambridge, MA: Perseus; 2000a:.
31. Goh S,Cousins JB,Elliott C.Organizational learning capacity, evaluative inquiry and readiness for change in schools: views and perceptions of educators.Journal of Educational Change. 2006;7 (4): 289-318.
32. Hackman J,Oldham G.Development of the job diagnostic survey.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1975;60 (2): 159-170.
33. Hair JF,Black WC,Babin BJ,Anderson RE,Tatham RLMultivariate Data Analysis. 2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006:.
34. Hallinger P,Heck R.Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research.Education Administration Quarterly, 1980-1995. 1996;32(1): 5-45.
35. Hargreaves DH.The knowledge-creating school.British Journal of Educational Studies. 1999;47 (2): 122-144.
36. Harris A.Leading innovation and change: knowledge creation by schools for schools.European Journal of Education. 2008;43 (2): 219-228.
37. Hart PM,Wearing AJ,Conn M.Conventional wisdom is a poor predictor of the relationship between discipline policy, student misbehaviour and teacher stress.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1995;65 (1): 27-48.
38. Horne S.Organisation and change within educational systems: some implications of a loose-coupling model.Educational Management & Administration. 1992;20 (2): 88-98.
39. Hurley R,Hult GTM.Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination.Journal of Marketing. 1998;62 (3): 42-54.
40. Ichijo KKnowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. 2007) Enabling knowledge-based competence of a corporation. In: IchijoKNonakaI (eds) Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. New York: Oxford University Press, 83-96Ichijo KNonaka I, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007:83-96.
41. Ichijo K,Nonaka IKnowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. 2007) Knowledge as competitive advantage in the age of increasing globalization. In: IchijoKNonakaI (eds) Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-31Ichijo KNonaka I, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007:3-31.
42. Ingersoll RMWho Controls Teachers' Work? Power and Accountability in America's Schools. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003:.
43. Jöreskog K,Sörbom DLISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. 2001) LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, 2nd edn. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software InternationalLincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 2001:.
44. Kline RBPrinciples and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. New York: The Guilford PressNew York: The Guilford Press; 2005:.
45. Kutner MH,Nachtsheim CJ,Neter JApplied Linear Regression Models. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2004:.
46. Kotter JP,Cohen DSThe Heart of Change: Real Life Stories of How People Change their Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2002:.
47. Kruse SDCommunity as foundation for professionalism: Case studies of middle school teachers. Unpublished PhD dissertation: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 1995:.
48. Leech NL,Barrett KC,Morgan GASPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005:.
49. Leithwood K,Leonard L,Sharratt L.Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools.Educational Administration Quarterly. 1998;34 (2): 243-276.
50. Leithwood K,Louis KSOrganizational Learning in Schools. 1998) Organizational Learning in Schools. Lisse: Swets and ZeitlingerLisse: Swets and Zeitlinger; 1998:.
51. Leonard DWellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1998:.
52. Locke EA,Latham GPA Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990:.
53. Marks HM,Louis KS,Printy SMUnderstanding Schools as Intelligent Systems. 2000) The capacity for organizational learning: implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In: LeithwoodKLouisKS (eds) Understanding Schools as Intelligent Systems. Greenwood, CT: JAILeithwood KLouis KS, ed. Greenwood, CT: JAI; 2000:.
54. Marks HM,Louis KS.Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for teachers' instructional practice and student academic performance.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1997;19 (3): 245-275.
55. Marks HM,Louis KS.Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning.Educational Administration Quarterly. 1999;35 (5): 707-750.
56. McRoy I,Gibbs P.Leading change in higher education.Educational Management and Administration. 2009;37 (5): 687-704.
57. Morgeson FP,Campion MAHandbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2003:423-452.
58. Morgeson FP,Johnson MD,Campion MA,Medsker GJ,Mumford TV.Understanding reactions to job redesign: a quasi-experimental investigation of the moderating effects of organizational context on perceptions of performance behavior.Personnel Psychology. 2006;59 (2): 333-363.
59. Mulford WRInternational Handbook of International Change. 1998) Organizational learning and educational change. In: HargreavesALiebermannAFullanMHopkinsD (eds) International Handbook of International Change. London: Kluwer Academic, 616-636Hargreaves ALiebermann AFullan MHopkins D, ed. London: Kluwer Academic; 1998:616-636.
60. Newmann F,Wehlage TAuthentic Achievement: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1996:.
61. Nonaka I,Takeuchi HThe Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995:.
62. Nonaka I,Toyama R.The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creating as a synthesizing process.Knowledge Management Research and Practice. 2003;1 (1): 2-10.
63. Oldham GR,Cummings A.Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work.Academy of Management Journal. 1996;36 (3): 607-634.
64. Parker SK,Williams HM,Turner N.Modeling the antecedents of proactive work behavior at work.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91 (3): 636-652.
65. Paulus PB,Nakui T,Putman VLCreativity and Innovation in Organizational Team. 2006) Group brainstorming and teamwork: some rules for the road to innovation. In: ThompsonLChoiHS (eds) Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Team. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 69-86New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006:69-86.
66. Rosenholtz SJ,Simpson C.Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers' commitment.Sociology of Education. 1990;63 (4): 241-257.
67. Sagie A,Zaidman N,Hamburger YA,Te' eni D,Schwartz DG.An empirical assessment of the loose-tight leadership model: quantitative and qualitative analyses.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2002;23 (3): 303-320.
68. Schwab R,Iwanicki E.Perceived role conflict, role ambiguity, and teacher burnout.Educational Administration Quarterly. 1982;18 (1): 60-74.
69. Senge PMThe Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday; 1990:.
70. Sergiovanni TJLeadership: What's in it for Schools?. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2001:.
71. Silins H,Mulford WSecond International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. 2002) Leadership and school results. In: LeithwoodKHallingerP (eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 561-612Leithwood KHallinger P, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 2002:561-612.
72. Silins HC,Mulford WR,Zarins S.Organizational learning and school change.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2002;38 (5): 613-642.
73. Smyth LF,van der Vegt R.Innovation in schools: some dilemmas of implementation.Educational Management & Administration. 1993;21 (2): 115-122.
74. Somech A,Bogler R.Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2002;38 (4): 555-577.
75. Song JHThe determinants of organizational performance: the mutual impacts of dimensions of learning organization and dynamic knowledge creation practices. Unpublished PhD dissertation: The Pennsylvania State University; 2008:.
76. Song JH.The effect of learning organization culture on the practices of human knowledge-creation: an empirical study in Korea.International Journal of Training and Development. 2008a;12 (4): 265-281.
77. Song JH.The key to organizational performance improvement: a perspective of organizational knowledge creation.Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2008b;21 (2): 87-102.
78. Song JH,Chermack TJ.A theoretical approach to the organizational knowledge formation process: integrating the concepts of individual learning and learning organization culture.Human Resource Development Review. 2008;7 (4): 424-442.
79. Southern Regional Education Board,. (High Schools that Work: An Enhanced Design to Get All Students to Standards. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board; 2007:.
80. Starnaman SM,Miller KI.A test of a causal model of communication and burnout in the teaching profession.Communication Education. 1992;41 (1): 40-53.
81. Sutton RI.Job stress among primary and secondary schoolteachers: its relationship to ill-being.Work and Occupations. 1984;11 (1): 7-28.
82. Taylor JE.The struggle to survive: examining the sustainability of schools' comprehensive school reform efforts.Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 2006;11 (3&4): 331-352.
83. Thompson BExploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004:.
84. Thompson B,Daniel LG.Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of score: a historical overview and some guidelines.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1996;56 (2): 197-208.
85. Torraco RJ.Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples.Human Resource Development Review. 2005;4 (3): 356-367.
86. Troyer L,Mueller CW,Osinsky PI.Who's the boss? A role-theoretic analysis of customer work.Work and Occupations. 2000;27 (3): 406-427.
87. Tubin D.Planning an innovative school: how to reduce the likelihood of regression toward the mean.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2009;37 (3): 404-421.
88. No Child Left Behind: A Desktop Reference. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; 2002:.
89. Van Dick R,Wagner U.Stress and strain in teaching: a structural equation approach.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;71 (2): 243-259.
90. Watkins KE,Marsick VJSculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1993:.
91. Watkins KE,Marsick VJIn Action: Creating the Learning Organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development; 1996:.
92. Watkins KE,Yang B,Marsick VJ. Measuring dimensions of the learning organization., Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference; 1997Atlanta, GA; 1997.
93. West MA,Sacramento CA,Fay DCreativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. 2006) Creativity and innovation implementation in work group: the paradoxical role of demands. In: ThompsonLChoiHS (eds) Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 137-159New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006:137-159.
94. Yang B,Watkins K,Marsick V.The construct of the learning organization: dimensions, measurement, and validation.Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2004;15 (1): 31-55.
95. Yoon SW,Song JH,Lim DH,Joo BK,. Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge., Human Resource Development International. in press:.
96. Zhou J,George JM.When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44 (4): 682-696.