Heteroglossic representations of scientific uncertainty: A sociolinguistic analysis of expert witness testimony to the bristol inquiry

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 816-841

  Kewell, Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

discourse; medical inquiries; narrative; risk; scientific uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155176283     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243910376157     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Abraham J.Distributing the benefit of the doubt: Scientists, regulators and drug safety.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1994;19:493-522.
2. Adam, B., and J. van Loon. 2000. Introduction: Repositioning risk; The challenge for social theory. In The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory, ed. B. Adam, U. Beck, and J. Van Loon, 1-32. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: SAGE.
3. Adams M.Whatever will be will be: Trust, fate and the reflexive self.Culture and Psychology. 2004;10:387-408.
4. Alaszewski A.The impact of the Bristol Royal Infirmary disaster and inquiry on public services in the UK.Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2002;16:371-78.
5. Atkinson J. M.,Drew P.Order in court: the organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan; 1979:.
6. Atkinson P.Medical talk and medical work: The liturgy of the clinic. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: SAGE; 1995:.
7. Binder R. L.Liability for the psychiatrist expert witness.American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159:1819-25.
8. Bora A.Technoscientific normativity and the iron cage of Law.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010;35:3-28.
9. Bull C.,Yates R.,Sarkar D.,Deansfield J.,de Leval M.Scientific, ethical and logistical considerations in introducing a new operation: A retrospective cohort study from paediatric cardiac surgery.British Medical Journal. 2000;320:1168-73.
10. Butler-Sloss E.,Hall A.Expert witnesses, courts and the law.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2002;95:431-34.
11. Bromley D. B.Reputation, image and impression management. Chichester: John Wiley; 1993:.
12. Cambrusio A.,Keating P.,Mac Kenzie M.Scientific practice in the Courtroom: The construction of sociotechnical identities in a biotechnology patent dispute.Social Problems. 1990;37:275-93.
13. Catchpole K.,Giddings A.,De Leval M.,Peek G.,Godden P. J.,Utley M.,Gallivan S.,Hirst G.,Dale T.Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery.Ergonomics. 2006;49:567-88.
14. Caudill D.Images of expertise: Converging discourses on the use and abuse of science in Massachusetts vs.EPA. Villanova Environmental Law Journal. 2007;18:185-207.
15. Cotterill J.Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003:.
16. Crawford-Brown D.Models of human health risk analysis in legal and policy decisions.Law and Contemporary Problems. 2001;64:63-81.
17. Daemmrich A.The evidence does not speak for itself: Expert witnesses and the organisation of DNA typing companies.Social Studies of Science. 1998;28:741-72.
18. Davis H. T. O.,Valentine-Shields A.Public trust and accountability for clinical performance: Lessons from the national reportage of the Bristol hearing.Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 1999;5:335-42.
19. Edmond G.Science, law and narrative: Helping the facts to speak for themselves.South Illinois University Law Journal. 1999;23:555-83.
20. Edmond G.Legal engineering: Contested representations of law, science (and non-science) and society.Social Studies of Science. 2002;32:371-412.
21. Edmond G.Supersizing Daubert science for litigation and its implications for legal practice and scientific research.Villanova Law Review. 2007;52:857-924.
22. Ewick P.,Silbey S.Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Towards sociology of narrative.Law and Society Review. 1995;29:197-226.
23. Fairclough N.Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge; 2003:.
24. Fox, N. 1999. Post modern reflections on 'risk', 'hazards' and life choices. In Risk and sociocultural theory, ed. D. Lupton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Freedom R. M.,Lock J.,Bricker J. T.Paediatric cardiology and cardiovascular surgery: 1950-2000.Circulation. 2000;102:58-68.
26. Freeman S.Introduction: Verbal communication in medical encounters.Text. 1987;7:3-17.
27. Friston M.New rules for expert witnesses: The last shot for the hired gun.British Medical Journal. 1999;318:1365-66.
28. Gibbons J.Language and the law.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 1999;19:156-73.
29. Giddens A.Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991:.
30. Halliday M.Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English.Foundations in Language. 1970;6:322-61.
31. Heffer C.The language of the jury trial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2005:.
32. Hilgartner, S. 1992. The social construction of risk objects: Or how to pry open networks of risk. In Organizations, uncertainties, and risk, ed. J. F. Short Jr. and L. Clarke. Boulder: Westview.
33. Hoye L."You may think that; I couldn't possibly comment!".Modality studies: Contemporary research and future directions. Part II. Journal of Pragmatics. 2004;37:1481-506.
34. Hurwitz B.Clinical guidelines: Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines.British Medical Journal. 1999;318:661-64.
35. Jasanoff S.Science at the bar: Law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press; 1995:.
36. Kewell B.Language games and tragedy: The Bristol royal infirmary tragedy revisited.Health, Risk and Society. 2006;8:359-78.
37. Kewell B.,Beck M.NHS inquiries: A time series analysis.Public Money and Management. 2008a;28:375-83.
38. Kewell B.,Beck M.The shifting sands of uncertainty: Risk construction and BSE/vCJD.Health, Risk and Society. 2008b;10:133-48.
39. Locke T.Critical discourse analysis. London and New York: Continuum; 2004:.
40. Losty D.Recent advances: Paediatric surgery.British Medical Journal. 1999;318:1668-72.
41. Maley, Y. 1994. The language of the law. In Language and the law, ed. J. Gibbons. New York and London: Longman Publishing.
42. Mellor F.Negotiating uncertainty: Asteroids, risk and the media.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19:16-33.
43. Moore A.,Stilgoe J.Experts and anecdotes: The role of "anecdotal evidence" in public scientific controversies.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2009;34:654-77.
44. Panel of the Bristol Inquiry. 2001. Learning from Bristol: The report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Command Paper: CM5207. London: HMSO Publications.
45. Partman S.,Marler P.The umwelt and its relevance to animal communication: Introduction to special issue.Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2002;116:116-19.
46. Reason J.Human error: Models and management.British Medical Journal. 2000;320:768-70.
47. Saks M.Expert witness, non-expert witness, and non-witness expert.Law and Human Behaviour. 1990;14:291-313.
48. Samanta A.,Samanta J.,Gunn M.Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: Will NICE make a difference?.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003;96:133-38.
49. Schlich T.Objectifying uncertainty: History of risk concepts in medicine.Topoi. 2004;23:211-19.
50. Smithson M.Ignorance and uncertainty: emerging paradigms. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag; 1989:.
51. Spiegelhalter D. J.An investigation into the relationship between mortality and volume of cases in surgery for congenital heart disease from 1984-1995. Cambridge: Institute of Public Health; 2000:.
52. Tannen D.Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:.
53. Tiersma P. M.Legal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1999:.
54. Umphrey M.The dialogics of legal meaning: Spectacular trials, the unwritten law, and narratives of criminal responsibility.Law and Society Review. 1999;33:393-423.
55. Verstraete J. C.Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system.Journal of Pragmatics. 2001;33:1505-28.
56. Wales C.,Mythen G.Risky discourses: The politics of GM foods.Environmental Politics. 2002;11:121-44.
57. Walsh K.Clinical review: ABC of interventional cardiology-Interventional paediatric cardiology.British Medical Journal. 2003;327:385-88.
58. Weick K.,Sutcliffe K.Hospitals as cultures of entrapment: A reanalysis of the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry.California Management Review. 2003;45:73-85.
59. Wooffitt R.Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Routledge; 2005:.
60. Zinn J.Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008:.