The Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Believability of Exercise-Related Messages and Intentions

Health Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 746-752

  Berry, Tanya R ^a   Jones, Kelvin E ^a   McLeod, Nicole C ^a   Spence, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Believability; Exercise advertising; Implicit measures; Intentions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXPLICIT BELIEVABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT BELIEVABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTIVATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; WALKING;

ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AGED; COGNITION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS;

EID: 82055168884     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: 19307810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025082     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ajzen I. Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations 2006, Retrieved from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
2. Beltramini R.F. Perceived believability of warning label information presented in cigarette advertising. Journal of Advertising 1985, 17:26-32.
3. Berry T.R. Who's even interested in the exercise message? Attentional bias for exercise and sedentary lifestyle related words. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2006, 28:4-17.
4. Berry T.R., Howe B.L. The effects of exercise advertising on self-efficacy and decisional balance. American Journal of Health Behavior 2005, 29:117-126.
5. Berry T.R., McCarville R.E., Rhodes R.E. Getting to know the competition: A content analysis of publicly and corporate funded physical activity advertisements. Journal of Health Communication 2008, 13:169-180. doi: 10.1080/10810730701854086.
6. Blunch N.J. Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS 2008, Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
7. Calitri R., Lowe R., Eves F.F., Bennett P. Associations between visual attention, implicit and explicit attitude, and behavior for physical activity. Psychology and Health 2009, 9:1105-1123. doi: 10.1080/08870440802245306.
8. Fallon E.A., Hausenblas H.A. Media images of the " ideal" female body: Can acute exercise moderate their psychological impact?. Body Image 2005, 2:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.001.
9. Fazio R.H., Olson M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:297-327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.
10. Friese M., Hofmann W., Schmitt M. When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology 2008, 19:284-338.
11. Hagger M.S., Chatzisarantis N.L.D., Biddle S.J.H. A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2002, 24:3-32.
12. Halliwell E., Dittmar H., Orsborn A. The effects of exposure to muscular male models among men: Exploring the moderating role of gym use and exercise motivation. Body Image 2007, 4:278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.006.
13. Huang Y., Hutchinson J.W. Counting every thought: Implicit measures of cognitive responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 35:98-118. doi: 10.1086/527340.
14. Jepson R.G., Harris F.M., Platt S., Tannahill C. The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviors: A review of reviews. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:528. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-538.
15. Laczniak R.N., Muehling D.D., Grossbart S. Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of Advertising 1989, 18(2):28-38.
16. Maibach E. The influence of the media environment on physical activity: Looking for the big picture. American Journal of Health Promotion 2007, 21:353-362.
17. O'Cass A., Griffin D. Antecedents and consequences of social issue advertising believability. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 2006, 15:87-104. doi: 10.1300/J054v15n01_05.
18. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology 1986, 19:123-205. Academic Press, New York, NY. L. Berkowitz (Ed.).
19. Petty R.E., Priester J.R., Brinol P. Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Media effects: Advances in theory and research 2002, 155-189. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Bryant, D. Zillmann (Eds.).
20. Physical activity 2011, Public Health Agency of Canada, Retrieved from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/hp-ps/hl-mvs/pa-ap/index-eng.php.
21. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA.
22. Physical activity guidelines for Americans 2009, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Retrieved from http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/factSheetAdults.aspx.
23. Wilson T.D., Lindsey S., Schooler T.Y. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 2000, 107:101-126. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101.
24. Zaichowsky J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 1985, 12:341-352. doi: 10.1086/208520.