To have or not to have Internet at home: Implications for online shopping

Information Economics and Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 213-226

  Pérez Hernández, Javier ^a   Sánchez Mangas, Rocío ^b  

^a Banco Español de Crédito ^*  (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Binary choice models; Endogeneity; Internet at home; Online shopping; Sample selection

Indexed keywords

CHOICE MODEL; DATA SETS; ENDOGENEITY; HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS; INTERNET CONNECTION; INTERNET USERS; LOCATION FACTORS; ONLINE SHOPPING; RELATED VARIABLES; SAMPLE SELECTION; SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS; STATISTICAL OFFICES; TWO-STEP MODEL;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; PROBABILITY; SURVEYS;

INTERNET;

DATA SET; DECISION ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; INTERNET; NUMERICAL MODEL; SHOPPING ACTIVITY; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS;

EID: 82055166641     PISSN: 01676245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bhatnagar A., Misra S., Rao H.R. On risk, convenience and Internet shopping behavior. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 2000, 43(11):98-105.
2. Brengman M., Geuens M., Weijters B., Smith S.M., Swinyard W.R. Segmenting Internet shoppers based on their Web-usage related lifestyle: a cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Research 2005, 58:79-88.
3. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., 2005. The intended and actual adoption of online purchasing: a brief review of recent literature. Institute of Transportation Studies. University of California, Davis. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-05-07.
4. Cerno, L., Pérez-Amaral, T., 2009. E-commerce Use in Spain. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1401591.
5. Chang M.K., Cheung W., Lai V.S. Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information & Management 2005, 42:543-559.
6. Cheung C.M.K., Chan G.W.W., Limayen M. A critical review of online consumer behavior. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 2005, 3:1-19.
7. Constantinides E. Influencing the online consumer's behavior: the Web experience. Internet Research 2004, 14(2):111-126.
8. European Commission, 2010. A Digital Agenda for Europe, COM, 2010 (245 final).
9. Eurostat, 2009. Information Society Statistics http://eep.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/information_society/data/main_tables.
10. Freedman D.A., Sekhon J.S. Endogeneity in probit response models. Political Analysis 2010, 18:138-150.
11. Goldfarb A., Prince J. Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Informations Economics and Policy 2008, 20:2-15.
12. Greene T. Poor SSL set-up can kill e-commerce. Network World Magazine 2010.
13. Hitt L., Tambe P. Broadband adoption and content consumption. Information Economics and Policy 2007, 19:362-378.
14. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P., Schlosser A.E. The evolution of the digital divide: how gaps in internet access may impact electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2000, 5:3.
15. Lambrecht, A., Seim, K., 2006. Adoption and Usage of Online Services in the Presence of Complementary Offline Services: Retail Banking. NET Institute. Working Paper #06-27.
16. Lynch P.D., Kent R.J., Srinivasan S.S. The global Internet shopper: evidence from shopping tasks in twelve countries. Journal of Advertising Research 2001, 41(3):15-23.
17. Monsuwé T.P., Dellaert B.G.C., Ruyter K. What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2004, 15(1):102-121.
18. Orviska M., Hudson J. Dividing or uniting Europe? Internet usage in the EU. Information Economics and Policy 2009, 21:279-290.
19. Prince J.T., Simon D.H. Has the Internet accelerated the diffusion of new products?. Research Policy 2009, 38:1269-1277.
20. Rivers D., Vuong Q. Limited Information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics 1988, 39:347-366.
21. Sorce P., Perotti V., Widrick S. Attitude and age differences in online buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 2005, 33(2):122-132.
22. Swinyard W.R., Smith S.M. Why people (don't) shop online: a lifestyle study of the Internet consumer. Psychology & Marketing 2003, 20(7):567-597.
23. Van de Ven W.P.M.M., Van Praag B.M.S. The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics 1981, 17:229-252.
24. Vijayasarathy L.R. Product characteristics and Internet shopping intentions. Internet Research 2002, 12(5):411-426.
25. Zhou L., Dai L., Zhang D. Online shopping acceptance model - a critical survey of consumer factors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2007, 8(1):41-62.