Endogeneity in probit response models

Political Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 138-150

  Freedman, David A ^a   Sekhon, Jasjeet S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956600654     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpp037     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Angrist, J. D. 2001. Estimation of limited-dependent variable models with binary endogenous regressors: simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19:2-28(with discussion).
2. Bhattacharya, J., D. Goldman, and D. McCaffrey. 2006. Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments. Statistics in Medicine 25:389-413.
3. Briggs, D. C. 2004. Causal inference and the Heckman model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29:397-420.
4. Bushway, S., B. D. Johnson, and L. A. Slocum. 2007. Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23:151-78.
5. Copas, J. B., and H. G. Li. 1997. Inference for non-random samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 59:55-77.
6. Dunning, T., and D. A. Freedman. 2007. Modeling selection effects. In The handbook of social science methodology, eds. Steven Turner and William Outhwaite, 225-31. London: Sage.
7. Freedman, D. A. 2005. Statistical models: theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Freedman, D. A. 2007. How can the score test be inconsistent? The American Statistician 61:291-95.
9. Heckman, J. J. 1978. Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46:931-59.
10. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153-61.
11. Meng, C., and P. Schmidt. 1985. On the cost of partial observability in the bivariate probit model. International Economic Review 26:71-85.
12. Mills, J. P. 1926. Table of the ratio: area to boundary ordinate, for any portion of the normal curve. Biometrika 18:395-400.
13. Muthen, B. 1979. A structural probit model with latent variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:807-11.
14. Ono, H. 2007. Careers in foreign-owned firms in Japan. American Sociological Review 72:267-90.
15. Rao, C. R. 1973. Linear statistical inference. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
16. Rivers, D., and Q. H. Vuong. 1988. Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics 39:347-66.
17. Sekhon, J. S., and W. R. Mebane Jr. 1998. Genetic optimization using derivatives: theory and application to nonlinear models. Political Analysis 7:189-213.
18. Stata. 2005. Stata base reference manual. Stata Statistical Software. Release 9. Vol. 1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
19. Tong, Y. L. 1980. Probability inequalities in multivariate distributions. New York: Academic Press.
20. Van de Ven, W. P. M. M., and B. M. S. Van Praag. 1981. The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics 17:229-52.
21. Winship, C., and R. D. Mare. 1992. Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology 18:327-50.
22. Yee, T. W. 2007. The VGAM package. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/y~ee/VGAM